Anonymous wrote:Looks like the person is simply asking for MLS's reasoning behind it since it does stand out as the only league that does it. Doesn't seem to be much of a ask
Anonymous wrote:Maybe, but why does MLSN do that? Would be nice to hear their reasoning instead of wiping those age groups out a few months into the season. It all feels like a slow death of those age groups in MLS and eventually they will be dropped from the league.
Anonymous wrote:Looks like the person is simply asking for MLS's reasoning behind it since it does stand out as the only league that does it. Doesn't seem to be much of a ask
Anonymous wrote:Maybe, but why does MLSN do that? Would be nice to hear their reasoning instead of wiping those age groups out a few months into the season. It all feels like a slow death of those age groups in MLS and eventually they will be dropped from the league.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: At those ages, the only relevant questions are whether your kid is learning, are having the opportunity to implement what they are learning, and are they getting better?
Especially for bench warmers on top winning teams, ask yourself, are your practices and training sufficient to keep up and get better? Are you allowed to maximize the minutes you do get of play?
Some folks are so busy focused on the scoreboard, they don't realize for 2 years their kid isn't developing while the team has winning record.
Then kid is number 25 on a 22 player roster depth chart
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe, but why does MLSN do that? Would be nice to hear their reasoning instead of wiping those age groups out a few months into the season. It all feels like a slow death of those age groups in MLS and eventually they will be dropped from the league.
Can you be any sillier and more dramatic while showing you're a suburban soccer mom who doesn't understand the context of early ages development
Showing standings of U13 and U14 has zero value to the public
If your kid won a U13 game this past weekend and you want the world to know, post on TikTok or IG
Anonymous wrote:Maybe, but why does MLSN do that? Would be nice to hear their reasoning instead of wiping those age groups out a few months into the season. It all feels like a slow death of those age groups in MLS and eventually they will be dropped from the league.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone have any idea why MLS Next is doing this? They take them away without any explanation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many MLS Next clubs are manipulating the truth about game results to promote their programs and attract new players. They push a narrative that emphasizes their success at this level, often at the expense of transparency. By controlling the flow of information and hiding less favorable results, they perpetuate a misleading image of their development programs. This strategy is more about maintaining a façade than genuinely focusing on player growth, creating a cycle of misinformation that benefits the club’s reputation rather than the players’ development.
100% correct.
Eh, if you believe that winning equates development, than I guess not being able to see standings would bother you.
The quote above was not talking about winning; quite the contrary. I agree with you, winning is not development. But when a club mostly loses and, on top of that, develops nothing at all, then you have a recipe for disaster.
Your previous is cryptic though. What about hiding a (presumably) losing record says about development at this club? Do teams not know they have a losing record? Is losing a reflection of ineffective training?
What is bad about development at this club? What do they do that is not player focused?
I’m genuinely curious. There must be something they’re doing that attracts players still despite a loosing record. Are you saying that that “something” no longer exists?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many MLS Next clubs are manipulating the truth about game results to promote their programs and attract new players. They push a narrative that emphasizes their success at this level, often at the expense of transparency. By controlling the flow of information and hiding less favorable results, they perpetuate a misleading image of their development programs. This strategy is more about maintaining a façade than genuinely focusing on player growth, creating a cycle of misinformation that benefits the club’s reputation rather than the players’ development.
100% correct.
Eh, if you believe that winning equates development, than I guess not being able to see standings would bother you.
The quote above was not talking about winning; quite the contrary. I agree with you, winning is not development. But when a club mostly loses and, on top of that, develops nothing at all, then you have a recipe for disaster.