Anonymous wrote:Good debate on home field Kamala. Time to go on Fox. Be presidential... Or be a coward.

She’s offered to debate again. Trump doesn’t want to.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).

But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?

Actually, she WAS at the Capitol on January 6. She was ALSO other places on that day.

According to Politico.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/04/doj-kamala-harris-jan-6-519505

Ah—but you had to look it up, didn’t you?
I bet this is the first time you knew that she wasn’t there. And is t it odd that she wasn’t there? Why not? Wasn’t she meant to be present at the Capitol? What was she doing at the DNC headquarters and why doesn’t anyone ever ask her about it?
Is no one curious?

“THEY’RE EATING THE DOGS. THEY’RE EATING THE CATS. THEY’RE EATING THE PETS IN SPRINGFIELD.”

You all do love your conspiracies.

Appears likely a few migrants were collecting and eating geese from a pond in the park.

OTOH, geese are federally-protected waterfowl and still federal penalties are imposed on those who hunt them unlawfully. Probably worse than eating someone pet.

So there's one isolated instance of some migrants taking geese from a pond. And another isolated instance of some mentally ill lady who is NOT a migrant who apparently stomped a cat, killed it and allegedly started eating it. And from there we basically have as Trump's immigration platform: "We HAvE To SeAL ThE BorDEr AnD RoUND Up MiLLiOnS BeCAuSE tHErE ArE RovINg HOrDEs Of MiLLioNS oF MiGRANtS RAmPAgInG ThROuGH ThE StrEEtS SteaLInG CaTs AnD DoGS aND EaTiNG TheM!!!!!1!!!!"

Trump land is truly bizarro world.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I don’t think the moderators were at all fair to trump, it is also a fact Kamala Harris exceeded
most people's expectations last night.

That said, when it comes to getting things done, not just saying nice-sounding words, I strongly believe that Trump will do a far better job. After all, if Kamala can do great things, why hasn't she?

Biden rarely shows up for work, so she's basically in charge already. The question comes down to this:

- do you want current trends to continue for 4 more years or do you want change?

Harris is not the current president. Harris, as VP, supports Biden and carries out Biden’s agenda at his behest. Your personal view that “she’s basically in charge already” doesn’t change that and isn’t provably accurate beyond your opinion. So with Trump, he has a track record as President, and it’s fair to ask why, if he’s committed to a goal, he did not accomplish it when he had the chance. That’s not a fair question for Harris. She gets: “How would you accomplish the goal — given the opportunity “. With Harris, we don’t exactly know how she would do “great things” as President— because she hasn’t been President yet. While you might believe that Trump would “do a far better job” — that his”job” includes cozying up to dictators, rolling back civil rights of many kinds, and overcharging the SS while he plays golf is something that most of us adamantly reject.

I’m more than fine with 4 more years of current trends.

This.
Trump had four years to “make America great again” and he just blew up the debt and dropped the ball on a pandemic. So much winning we were promised.
Hard pass on Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).

But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?

Actually, she WAS at the Capitol on January 6. She was ALSO other places on that day.

According to Politico.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/04/doj-kamala-harris-jan-6-519505

Ah—but you had to look it up, didn’t you?
I bet this is the first time you knew that she wasn’t there. And is t it odd that she wasn’t there? Why not? Wasn’t she meant to be present at the Capitol? What was she doing at the DNC headquarters and why doesn’t anyone ever ask her about it?
Is no one curious?

“THEY’RE EATING THE DOGS. THEY’RE EATING THE CATS. THEY’RE EATING THE PETS IN SPRINGFIELD.”

You all do love your conspiracies.

Appears likely a few migrants were collecting and eating geese from a pond in the park.

OTOH, geese are federally-protected waterfowl and still federal penalties are imposed on those who hunt them unlawfully. Probably worse than eating someone pet.

Trump knows that he is a global laughing stock meme today because of his unhinged lie about people eating pets. So we will all be treated now to days of justifications as to how he was actually correct.

Anonymous wrote:Good debate on home field Kamala. Time to go on Fox. Be presidential... Or be a coward.

Trump doesn't even want to debate her on Fox. He's that much of a coward.

Anonymous wrote:While I don’t think the moderators were at all fair to trump, it is also a fact Kamala Harris exceeded
most people's expectations last night.

That said, when it comes to getting things done, not just saying nice-sounding words, I strongly believe that Trump will do a far better job. After all, if Kamala can do great things, why hasn't she?

Biden rarely shows up for work, so she's basically in charge already. The question comes down to this:

- do you want current trends to continue for 4 more years or do you want change?

Harris is not the current president. Harris, as VP, supports Biden and carries out Biden’s agenda at his behest. Your personal view that “she’s basically in charge already” doesn’t change that and isn’t provably accurate beyond your opinion. So with Trump, he has a track record as President, and it’s fair to ask why, if he’s committed to a goal, he did not accomplish it when he had the chance. That’s not a fair question for Harris. She gets: “How would you accomplish the goal — given the opportunity “. With Harris, we don’t exactly know how she would do “great things” as President— because she hasn’t been President yet. While you might believe that Trump would “do a far better job” — that his”job” includes cozying up to dictators, rolling back civil rights of many kinds, and overcharging the SS while he plays golf is something that most of us adamantly reject.

I’m more than fine with 4 more years of current trends.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).

But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?

Actually, she WAS at the Capitol on January 6. She was ALSO other places on that day.

According to Politico.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/04/doj-kamala-harris-jan-6-519505

Ah—but you had to look it up, didn’t you?
I bet this is the first time you knew that she wasn’t there. And is t it odd that she wasn’t there? Why not? Wasn’t she meant to be present at the Capitol? What was she doing at the DNC headquarters and why doesn’t anyone ever ask her about it?
Is no one curious?

“THEY’RE EATING THE DOGS. THEY’RE EATING THE CATS. THEY’RE EATING THE PETS IN SPRINGFIELD.”

You all do love your conspiracies.

Appears likely a few migrants were collecting and eating geese from a pond in the park.

OTOH, geese are federally-protected waterfowl and still federal penalties are imposed on those who hunt them unlawfully. Probably worse than eating someone pet.

Anonymous wrote:Moderators let a good 90% of Trump's lies go unchecked. If anything, they went easy on him.

The role of a debate moderator is to ask questions to initiate discussion, keep the participants on topic as best they can, maintain order by cutting off participants when their allotted speaking time has expired, and most importantly, to remain neutral. Suggesting moderators should play a role in fact checking opens the door to moderator bias creating an uneven playing field. Fact checking is to be done by the intended audience which in this case is the American people. There are neutral media sources we can turn to for accurate fact checking if we can step out of our political bubbles long enough to seek out sources of unbiased information.

I don't have a problem with the moderators fact checking some of Trump's obvious untruths as we saw last night. Most statements by both candidates were based on half truths and question dodging and the moderators correctly refrained from adding their two cents in response to the half truths and question dodging. Overall, it was a cleaner and less embarrassing for the country debate. Harris had a better showing in this debate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good debate on home field Kamala. Time to go on Fox. Be presidential... Or be a coward.

Fox does not deserve to have a debate and the advertising dollars. They had to spend millions because they were supporting the election fraud lie. And in addition, part of their defense was, they are not a news network. They are an entertainment network.

The debate should not be on an entertainment network, nor should it be on a network that spreads lies.

Agreed. The democrats should do everything in their power to undermine Fox News. This includes appearances and campaign spending.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good debate on home field Kamala. Time to go on Fox. Be presidential... Or be a coward.

Trump has said no to this. He is refusing to debate her again— **even if Fox hosts it**.


https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/11/trump-debate-winner-fox-00178611

Small handed coward. THIS is how you know that Harris ran over him, then backed up and sped over him several more times. He’s too chicken to have a second debate on his own home turf.

Missed that one, did you?

thats nice and all but did anyone really not have an opinion voting or not voting for the trump

Anonymous wrote:Good debate on home field Kamala. Time to go on Fox. Be presidential... Or be a coward.

Fox does not deserve to have a debate and the advertising dollars. They had to spend millions because they were supporting the election fraud lie. And in addition, part of their defense was, they are not a news network. They are an entertainment network.

The debate should not be on an entertainment network, nor should it be on a network that spreads lies.

Anonymous wrote:Good debate on home field Kamala. Time to go on Fox. Be presidential... Or be a coward.

Trump has said no to this. He is refusing to debate her again— **even if Fox hosts it**.


https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/11/trump-debate-winner-fox-00178611

Small handed coward. THIS is how you know that Harris ran over him, then backed up and sped over him several more times. He’s too chicken to have a second debate on his own home turf.

Missed that one, did you?

Moderators let a good 90% of Trump's lies go unchecked. If anything, they went easy on him.

Good debate on home field Kamala. Time to go on Fox. Be presidential... Or be a coward.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I don’t think the moderators were at all fair to trump, it is also a fact Kamala Harris exceeded
most people's expectations last night.

That said, when it comes to getting things done, not just saying nice-sounding words, I strongly believe that Trump will do a far better job. After all, if Kamala can do great things, why hasn't she?

Biden rarely shows up for work, so she's basically in charge already. The question comes down to this:

- do you want current trends to continue for 4 more years or do you want change?

Agree with this too. I can’t stand Trump, but it is true that he will get the unpopular things done. I think that’s one of his true skills, actually. He doesn’t GAF what others think of him and he will do (most of) what he says he will.

Harris definitely never answered the question about why the Biden/Harris administration hasn’t done the things she says need to be changed. And VERY tellingly, she completely avoided answering why Biden waited 3 1/2 years to act on securing the border, after saying “there was nothing” he could do - and six months before the election. I’d love to hear that answer.

Like never having an election again? Like using to Russia to spy on political opponents? Like gutting the US government? Like denying women abortions and IVF? Like building luxury condos in Gaza?

Those are all very unpopular things. Do we want a president to do things that are so unpopular a vast majority of Americans are opposed to them?