Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sadly, I spoke to someone in the city. They said she was really good and the media hasn't told the full story. Unfortunately, you can't really respond to the media requests so they've let the story sit.

So what’s the full story??

There's no full story. DC Dept of Buildings has a terrible reputation. Even if she was "good," or in this case I will take it to mean, better than the average DC Dept of Buildings employee, there's no way someone working another full-time job that required her to be physically pleasant for 3/5 of her working hours at another place during core work hours was performing at their full capacity. Employees may differ in abilities, but that doesn't justify wage theft.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sadly, I spoke to someone in the city. They said she was really good and the media hasn't told the full story. Unfortunately, you can't really respond to the media requests so they've let the story sit.

She was a really good liar and fraudster. There’s no way around it. She has no integrity and hereinafter will always be perceived as untrustworthty. Stop trying to defend her. If she were Black you wouldn’t care about how allegedly hard working she was. The hardworking Asian trope doesn’t overcome duplicitous behavior or crimes. 🙄

Wow. I am black. I actually forgot that she was Asian. I said that because I know someone who worked with her. They told me that she was really good. Not denying that it's fraud. Sensitive much?

BS

What part is BS?

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn’t she have lived in DC, DC proper with a high salary, I believe $150k which I’m guessing she should have been making.

Lol. There is no enforcement on this.

Anonymous wrote:Sadly, I spoke to someone in the city. They said she was really good and the media hasn't told the full story. Unfortunately, you can't really respond to the media requests so they've let the story sit.

So what’s the full story??

Anonymous wrote:So the dc government is basically like a version of the mafia?

Maybe we need a Netflix series on this.

Shouldn’t she have lived in DC, DC proper with a high salary, I believe $150k which I’m guessing she should have been making.

How she get away for so long??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sadly, I spoke to someone in the city. They said she was really good and the media hasn't told the full story. Unfortunately, you can't really respond to the media requests so they've let the story sit.

She was a really good liar and fraudster. There’s no way around it. She has no integrity and hereinafter will always be perceived as untrustworthty. Stop trying to defend her. If she were Black you wouldn’t care about how allegedly hard working she was. The hardworking Asian trope doesn’t overcome duplicitous behavior or crimes. 🙄

Wow. I am black. I actually forgot that she was Asian. I said that because I know someone who worked with her. They told me that she was really good. Not denying that it's fraud. Sensitive much?

BS

Anonymous wrote:Honestly, she is probably a better than the average employee and contributes more than most DC government employees. People that can effectively manage multiple jobs like this usually are high performing at all of them. DC has a weird hiring system that limits most jobs to DC residents which limits the talent pool and reduce the average quality of employees.

Oh really, how many do you know?

It isnt a weird hiring system. Every muni's city employees are required to live in the city, havent seen an exception.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can they claw back the monies for fraud?

Fraud requires proving damages. If she was excellent at both of her jobs, there are no damages.

Her being “excellent” is irrelevant. It’s fraud. You cannot collect checks for two full time jobs. And there is a DC statute that applies to this scenario and others have been prosecuted under it. She is not the first or the last. You are delusional and contorting yourself to defend criminal behavior.

Clearly, you're not a lawyer. If there's a statute addressing it, then she can be prosecuted under that statute. But if they want to collect money from her for fraud, they will need to prove damages.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sadly, I spoke to someone in the city. They said she was really good and the media hasn't told the full story. Unfortunately, you can't really respond to the media requests so they've let the story sit.

She was a really good liar and fraudster. There’s no way around it. She has no integrity and hereinafter will always be perceived as untrustworthty. Stop trying to defend her. If she were Black you wouldn’t care about how allegedly hard working she was. The hardworking Asian trope doesn’t overcome duplicitous behavior or crimes. 🙄

Wow. I am black. I actually forgot that she was Asian. I said that because I know someone who worked with her. They told me that she was really good. Not denying that it's fraud. Sensitive much?

Anonymous wrote:Sadly, I spoke to someone in the city. They said she was really good and the media hasn't told the full story. Unfortunately, you can't really respond to the media requests so they've let the story sit.

What “full story” could justify her having multiple jobs fraudulently?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can they claw back the monies for fraud?

Fraud requires proving damages. If she was excellent at both of her jobs, there are no damages.

Her being “excellent” is irrelevant. It’s fraud. You cannot collect checks for two full time jobs. And there is a DC statute that applies to this scenario and others have been prosecuted under it. She is not the first or the last. You are delusional and contorting yourself to defend criminal behavior.

Anonymous wrote:Sadly, I spoke to someone in the city. They said she was really good and the media hasn't told the full story. Unfortunately, you can't really respond to the media requests so they've let the story sit.

She was a really good liar and fraudster. There’s no way around it. She has no integrity and hereinafter will always be perceived as untrustworthty. Stop trying to defend her. If she were Black you wouldn’t care about how allegedly hard working she was. The hardworking Asian trope doesn’t overcome duplicitous behavior or crimes. 🙄

Anonymous wrote:Can they claw back the monies for fraud?

Fraud requires proving damages. If she was excellent at both of her jobs, there are no damages.