Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why women need to wear revealing clothing in public but men survive fine without it? Would we be as open to men wearing revealing clothing in public? If they want to flaunt what they got, shouldn't we be more accepting to see male genitalia in public?
Because we have historically been trained to please/entertain them. They get to be comfortable and functional (see flat shoes shoes), without painting their face and nails, curling their hair etc.
It is a waste of women’s time, and we should stop wearing costumes to entertain them.
And historically we as women needed to do that to secure our financial well-being. But that hasn't been the case for a long time now. So surely you do understand that a vast majority of us dress any way we like because WE LIKE IT. I like to have long hair that is not gray. I like to have nicely manicured nails, I like to wear dresses.
If you are courting sexual attention from strangers, don’t complain that they treat you like a sex object.
Existing in public isn’t “courting sexual attention from strangers”. People have foot fetishes— is everyone in sandals “courting sexual attention” from them?
If you wear yoga pants that reveals your cameltoe, go braless or something low cut, you have to be aware that you are attracting sexual attention. Maybe it’s what you want - and that’s fine! personally I think all attractive women should dress like that… weirdly, not all do - it’s like some of them don’t want men to leer at them and objectify them.
What you seem to not understand is that one attracts sexual attention simply by existing in public. Like I said— foot fetishes are well documented. My sandals are probably turning someone on. That person is probably leering and objectifying me. So should I never go out in sandals because some dude likes feet? Why are my clothing choices supposed to be constrained by the poor behavior (leering) of men?
Our planet is going though severe climate crisis, men are still finding excuses to have wars, underdeveloped nations are facing extreme poverty, healthcare systems are collapsing, mental illness, obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases on all time high, interest rates are crazy, big corporations are ruining small economies, racism is rampant while we are focused on Kardashian wannabes? Let people wear what they want as long as they aren't breaking any laws of public decency.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why women need to wear revealing clothing in public but men survive fine without it? Would we be as open to men wearing revealing clothing in public? If they want to flaunt what they got, shouldn't we be more accepting to see male genitalia in public?
Because we have historically been trained to please/entertain them. They get to be comfortable and functional (see flat shoes shoes), without painting their face and nails, curling their hair etc.
It is a waste of women’s time, and we should stop wearing costumes to entertain them.
And historically we as women needed to do that to secure our financial well-being. But that hasn't been the case for a long time now. So surely you do understand that a vast majority of us dress any way we like because WE LIKE IT. I like to have long hair that is not gray. I like to have nicely manicured nails, I like to wear dresses.
If you are courting sexual attention from strangers, don’t complain that they treat you like a sex object.
Existing in public isn’t “courting sexual attention from strangers”. People have foot fetishes— is everyone in sandals “courting sexual attention” from them?
If you wear yoga pants that reveals your cameltoe, go braless or something low cut, you have to be aware that you are attracting sexual attention. Maybe it’s what you want - and that’s fine! personally I think all attractive women should dress like that… weirdly, not all do - it’s like some of them don’t want men to leer at them and objectify them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why women need to wear revealing clothing in public but men survive fine without it? Would we be as open to men wearing revealing clothing in public? If they want to flaunt what they got, shouldn't we be more accepting to see male genitalia in public?
Because we have historically been trained to please/entertain them. They get to be comfortable and functional (see flat shoes shoes), without painting their face and nails, curling their hair etc.
It is a waste of women’s time, and we should stop wearing costumes to entertain them.
And historically we as women needed to do that to secure our financial well-being. But that hasn't been the case for a long time now. So surely you do understand that a vast majority of us dress any way we like because WE LIKE IT. I like to have long hair that is not gray. I like to have nicely manicured nails, I like to wear dresses.
If you are courting sexual attention from strangers, don’t complain that they treat you like a sex object.
Existing in public isn’t “courting sexual attention from strangers”. People have foot fetishes— is everyone in sandals “courting sexual attention” from them?
If you wear yoga pants that reveals your cameltoe, go braless or something low cut, you have to be aware that you are attracting sexual attention. Maybe it’s what you want - and that’s fine! personally I think all attractive women should dress like that… weirdly, not all do - it’s like some of them don’t want men to leer at them and objectify them.
What you seem to not understand is that one attracts sexual attention simply by existing in public. Like I said— foot fetishes are well documented. My sandals are probably turning someone on. That person is probably leering and objectifying me. So should I never go out in sandals because some dude likes feet? Why are my clothing choices supposed to be constrained by the poor behavior (leering) of men?
Anonymous wrote:Clothing should be sustainably produced, comfortable to wear and offer protection from weather and hygiene elements.
Sexy clothing is all good but people shouldn't complain if obese, old and unattractive men and women start flaunting it in public places, you can't limit it to hot and young females.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends what are we talking about here.
A low-cut V-neck, perhaps a backless classy dress.... or more like Diasy Dukes on a mother of 3?
If the former, I'll wear something like that to a wedding or party.
But if revealing is trashy, nope. That's low class to me
I always feel bad for boys whose mothers dress too trashy. And know those girls will be dressing the same way by 14 😟
Reminds me of the mom whose bumper sticker on her car said “If you’re going to ride my a$$, at least pull my hair!”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why women need to wear revealing clothing in public but men survive fine without it? Would we be as open to men wearing revealing clothing in public? If they want to flaunt what they got, shouldn't we be more accepting to see male genitalia in public?
Because we have historically been trained to please/entertain them. They get to be comfortable and functional (see flat shoes shoes), without painting their face and nails, curling their hair etc.
It is a waste of women’s time, and we should stop wearing costumes to entertain them.
And historically we as women needed to do that to secure our financial well-being. But that hasn't been the case for a long time now. So surely you do understand that a vast majority of us dress any way we like because WE LIKE IT. I like to have long hair that is not gray. I like to have nicely manicured nails, I like to wear dresses.
If you are courting sexual attention from strangers, don’t complain that they treat you like a sex object.
Existing in public isn’t “courting sexual attention from strangers”. People have foot fetishes— is everyone in sandals “courting sexual attention” from them?
If you wear yoga pants that reveals your cameltoe, go braless or something low cut, you have to be aware that you are attracting sexual attention. Maybe it’s what you want - and that’s fine! personally I think all attractive women should dress like that… weirdly, not all do - it’s like some of them don’t want men to leer at them and objectify them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why women need to wear revealing clothing in public but men survive fine without it? Would we be as open to men wearing revealing clothing in public? If they want to flaunt what they got, shouldn't we be more accepting to see male genitalia in public?
Because we have historically been trained to please/entertain them. They get to be comfortable and functional (see flat shoes shoes), without painting their face and nails, curling their hair etc.
It is a waste of women’s time, and we should stop wearing costumes to entertain them.
And historically we as women needed to do that to secure our financial well-being. But that hasn't been the case for a long time now. So surely you do understand that a vast majority of us dress any way we like because WE LIKE IT. I like to have long hair that is not gray. I like to have nicely manicured nails, I like to wear dresses.
If you are courting sexual attention from strangers, don’t complain that they treat you like a sex object.
Existing in public isn’t “courting sexual attention from strangers”. People have foot fetishes— is everyone in sandals “courting sexual attention” from them?
If you wear yoga pants that reveals your cameltoe, go braless or something low cut, you have to be aware that you are attracting sexual attention. Maybe it’s what you want - and that’s fine! personally I think all attractive women should dress like that… weirdly, not all do - it’s like some of them don’t want men to leer at them and objectify them.
Anonymous wrote:Only when we are on vacation in the Caribbean without our kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why women need to wear revealing clothing in public but men survive fine without it? Would we be as open to men wearing revealing clothing in public? If they want to flaunt what they got, shouldn't we be more accepting to see male genitalia in public?
Because we have historically been trained to please/entertain them. They get to be comfortable and functional (see flat shoes shoes), without painting their face and nails, curling their hair etc.
It is a waste of women’s time, and we should stop wearing costumes to entertain them.
And historically we as women needed to do that to secure our financial well-being. But that hasn't been the case for a long time now. So surely you do understand that a vast majority of us dress any way we like because WE LIKE IT. I like to have long hair that is not gray. I like to have nicely manicured nails, I like to wear dresses.
If you are courting sexual attention from strangers, don’t complain that they treat you like a sex object.
Existing in public isn’t “courting sexual attention from strangers”. People have foot fetishes— is everyone in sandals “courting sexual attention” from them?