Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all are still bickering and I’m not sure OP
has even come back.
🤣 OP here. I've been reading but this thread is...a lot
I'm not sure what else to ask other than: why do people keep mentioning the inability to do IB and take extra curriculars. I'm big on the idea that kids should have well rounded school experiences. Is the extra coursework in IB problems so great that kids can't have outside activities. That doesn't sound like a great trade off but I could be misunderstanding.
It’s a prescriptive program that wasn’t designed with American HS kids with their own extra-curricular interests in mind. So some of the requirements take up a lot of time.
I’ll admit I’m biased. We were at an IB school where a lot of kids doing the full IB program were miserable and then resentful when other kids they knew got into the same or better schools. I think you really need to do full IB for its intrinsic value, such as it is, and not expecting some big payoff in terms of college admissions.
+1
IB is not going to help in college admissions, because of its rigidity and a lot of busy work. For academics AP kids can easily take 6-8 core APs outshining the 3 HL classes in the diploma program and as a results they are better prepared for college with a broader knowledge base.
IB kids sink a lot of time in their ToK, CAS, EE, etc, when the other kids load up on rigorous academic classes.
All of your reasoning is completely inconsequential. Universities look at admissions in the context of available courses at each school, so a comparison between a kid at an IB school versus an AP school is never drawn in the first place. Neither program helps nor hurts more than another as far as admissions goes.
Context matters but only marginally, it’s not the determining factor. You’ll be compared against the entire applicant pool, still need to take the challenging course load. You’re at a disadvantage in IB because it’s so restrictive and you waste so much effort on on the fluff. When did Theory of knowledge ever moved the needle on an applicant? But I’m certain taking AP Physics C matters. With AP, you have the flexibility to choose you schedule based on how capable you are, you can focus more in an area you’re interested in, and you have more rigorous courses to begin with.
Compare 6-8 APs with 3HL, there’s no contest and no surprise, IB kids don’t do as well in admissions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all are still bickering and I’m not sure OP
has even come back.
🤣 OP here. I've been reading but this thread is...a lot
I'm not sure what else to ask other than: why do people keep mentioning the inability to do IB and take extra curriculars. I'm big on the idea that kids should have well rounded school experiences. Is the extra coursework in IB problems so great that kids can't have outside activities. That doesn't sound like a great trade off but I could be misunderstanding.
It’s a prescriptive program that wasn’t designed with American HS kids with their own extra-curricular interests in mind. So some of the requirements take up a lot of time.
I’ll admit I’m biased. We were at an IB school where a lot of kids doing the full IB program were miserable and then resentful when other kids they knew got into the same or better schools. I think you really need to do full IB for its intrinsic value, such as it is, and not expecting some big payoff in terms of college admissions.
+1
IB is not going to help in college admissions, because of its rigidity and a lot of busy work. For academics AP kids can easily take 6-8 core APs outshining the 3 HL classes in the diploma program and as a results they are better prepared for college with a broader knowledge base.
IB kids sink a lot of time in their ToK, CAS, EE, etc, when the other kids load up on rigorous academic classes.
All of your reasoning is completely inconsequential. Universities look at admissions in the context of available courses at each school, so a comparison between a kid at an IB school versus an AP school is never drawn in the first place. Neither program helps nor hurts more than another as far as admissions goes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all are still bickering and I’m not sure OP
has even come back.
🤣 OP here. I've been reading but this thread is...a lot
I'm not sure what else to ask other than: why do people keep mentioning the inability to do IB and take extra curriculars. I'm big on the idea that kids should have well rounded school experiences. Is the extra coursework in IB problems so great that kids can't have outside activities. That doesn't sound like a great trade off but I could be misunderstanding.
It’s a prescriptive program that wasn’t designed with American HS kids with their own extra-curricular interests in mind. So some of the requirements take up a lot of time.
I’ll admit I’m biased. We were at an IB school where a lot of kids doing the full IB program were miserable and then resentful when other kids they knew got into the same or better schools. I think you really need to do full IB for its intrinsic value, such as it is, and not expecting some big payoff in terms of college admissions.
+1
IB is not going to help in college admissions, because of its rigidity and a lot of busy work. For academics AP kids can easily take 6-8 core APs outshining the 3 HL classes in the diploma program and as a results they are better prepared for college with a broader knowledge base.
IB kids sink a lot of time in their ToK, CAS, EE, etc, when the other kids load up on rigorous academic classes.
All of your reasoning is completely inconsequential. Universities look at admissions in the context of available courses at each school, so a comparison between a kid at an IB school versus an AP school is never drawn in the first place. Neither program helps nor hurts more than another as far as admissions goes.
I’d be more concerned with having a non-IB diploma kid at an IB school. Some IB schools put their diploma kids on a pedestal and everyone else gets treated like crap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all are still bickering and I’m not sure OP
has even come back.
🤣 OP here. I've been reading but this thread is...a lot
I'm not sure what else to ask other than: why do people keep mentioning the inability to do IB and take extra curriculars. I'm big on the idea that kids should have well rounded school experiences. Is the extra coursework in IB problems so great that kids can't have outside activities. That doesn't sound like a great trade off but I could be misunderstanding.
It’s a prescriptive program that wasn’t designed with American HS kids with their own extra-curricular interests in mind. So some of the requirements take up a lot of time.
I’ll admit I’m biased. We were at an IB school where a lot of kids doing the full IB program were miserable and then resentful when other kids they knew got into the same or better schools. I think you really need to do full IB for its intrinsic value, such as it is, and not expecting some big payoff in terms of college admissions.
+1
IB is not going to help in college admissions, because of its rigidity and a lot of busy work. For academics AP kids can easily take 6-8 core APs outshining the 3 HL classes in the diploma program and as a results they are better prepared for college with a broader knowledge base.
IB kids sink a lot of time in their ToK, CAS, EE, etc, when the other kids load up on rigorous academic classes.
All of your reasoning is completely inconsequential. Universities look at admissions in the context of available courses at each school, so a comparison between a kid at an IB school versus an AP school is never drawn in the first place. Neither program helps nor hurts more than another as far as admissions goes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all are still bickering and I’m not sure OP
has even come back.
🤣 OP here. I've been reading but this thread is...a lot
I'm not sure what else to ask other than: why do people keep mentioning the inability to do IB and take extra curriculars. I'm big on the idea that kids should have well rounded school experiences. Is the extra coursework in IB problems so great that kids can't have outside activities. That doesn't sound like a great trade off but I could be misunderstanding.
It’s a prescriptive program that wasn’t designed with American HS kids with their own extra-curricular interests in mind. So some of the requirements take up a lot of time.
I’ll admit I’m biased. We were at an IB school where a lot of kids doing the full IB program were miserable and then resentful when other kids they knew got into the same or better schools. I think you really need to do full IB for its intrinsic value, such as it is, and not expecting some big payoff in terms of college admissions.
+1
IB is not going to help in college admissions, because of its rigidity and a lot of busy work. For academics AP kids can easily take 6-8 core APs outshining the 3 HL classes in the diploma program and as a results they are better prepared for college with a broader knowledge base.
IB kids sink a lot of time in their ToK, CAS, EE, etc, when the other kids load up on rigorous academic classes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all are still bickering and I’m not sure OP
has even come back.
🤣 OP here. I've been reading but this thread is...a lot
I'm not sure what else to ask other than: why do people keep mentioning the inability to do IB and take extra curriculars. I'm big on the idea that kids should have well rounded school experiences. Is the extra coursework in IB problems so great that kids can't have outside activities. That doesn't sound like a great trade off but I could be misunderstanding.
It’s a prescriptive program that wasn’t designed with American HS kids with their own extra-curricular interests in mind. So some of the requirements take up a lot of time.
I’ll admit I’m biased. We were at an IB school where a lot of kids doing the full IB program were miserable and then resentful when other kids they knew got into the same or better schools. I think you really need to do full IB for its intrinsic value, such as it is, and not expecting some big payoff in terms of college admissions.
+1
IB is not going to help in college admissions, because of its rigidity and a lot of busy work. For academics AP kids can easily take 6-8 core APs outshining the 3 HL classes in the diploma program and as a results they are better prepared for college with a broader knowledge base.
IB kids sink a lot of time in their ToK, CAS, EE, etc, when the other kids load up on rigorous academic classes.
Anonymous wrote:Why does FCPS limit IB offering to just these schools?
https://www.fcps.edu/academics/high-school-grades-9-12/advanced-academics/international-baccalaureate-ib/schools
That’s where they could get away with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all are still bickering and I’m not sure OP
has even come back.
🤣 OP here. I've been reading but this thread is...a lot
I'm not sure what else to ask other than: why do people keep mentioning the inability to do IB and take extra curriculars. I'm big on the idea that kids should have well rounded school experiences. Is the extra coursework in IB problems so great that kids can't have outside activities. That doesn't sound like a great trade off but I could be misunderstanding.
It’s a prescriptive program that wasn’t designed with American HS kids with their own extra-curricular interests in mind. So some of the requirements take up a lot of time.
I’ll admit I’m biased. We were at an IB school where a lot of kids doing the full IB program were miserable and then resentful when other kids they knew got into the same or better schools. I think you really need to do full IB for its intrinsic value, such as it is, and not expecting some big payoff in terms of college admissions.
+1
IB is not going to help in college admissions, because of its rigidity and a lot of busy work. For academics AP kids can easily take 6-8 core APs outshining the 3 HL classes in the diploma program and as a results they are better prepared for college with a broader knowledge base.
IB kids sink a lot of time in their ToK, CAS, EE, etc, when the other kids load up on rigorous academic classes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all are still bickering and I’m not sure OP
has even come back.
🤣 OP here. I've been reading but this thread is...a lot
I'm not sure what else to ask other than: why do people keep mentioning the inability to do IB and take extra curriculars. I'm big on the idea that kids should have well rounded school experiences. Is the extra coursework in IB problems so great that kids can't have outside activities. That doesn't sound like a great trade off but I could be misunderstanding.
It’s a prescriptive program that wasn’t designed with American HS kids with their own extra-curricular interests in mind. So some of the requirements take up a lot of time.
I’ll admit I’m biased. We were at an IB school where a lot of kids doing the full IB program were miserable and then resentful when other kids they knew got into the same or better schools. I think you really need to do full IB for its intrinsic value, such as it is, and not expecting some big payoff in terms of college admissions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all are still bickering and I’m not sure OP
has even come back.
🤣 OP here. I've been reading but this thread is...a lot
I'm not sure what else to ask other than: why do people keep mentioning the inability to do IB and take extra curriculars. I'm big on the idea that kids should have well rounded school experiences. Is the extra coursework in IB problems so great that kids can't have outside activities. That doesn't sound like a great trade off but I could be misunderstanding.
Most AP parents know very little about IB and resort to criticizing it. I haven't read every single comment here but from quickly skimming the thread I didn't see any mention of the IB Program's built-in CAS (Creativity, Activity, Service) project.
The CAS project is a requirement for the IB Diploma existing precisely for kids to explore extracurriculars of interest at a broad level. They create a documented portfolio of experiences during junior and senior years as they engage in activities across three categories. As you can see CAS is quite flexible to meet the needs of any type of kid - Creative/artistic, Activity/athletic, or Service/community involvement. Culminating in a long-term, open-ended project of their choosing.
Of course, as with anything, kids get out of it what they put in. Some anti-IB folks will call this kind of thing fluff and a waste of time. I've seen some excellent projects and some low-effort ones. But if taken seriously, it's a great opportunity for kids to accomplish something meaningful to them and goes beyond grades and academics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all are still bickering and I’m not sure OP
has even come back.
🤣 OP here. I've been reading but this thread is...a lot
I'm not sure what else to ask other than: why do people keep mentioning the inability to do IB and take extra curriculars. I'm big on the idea that kids should have well rounded school experiences. Is the extra coursework in IB problems so great that kids can't have outside activities. That doesn't sound like a great trade off but I could be misunderstanding.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are looking for the best education/college prep:
Full slate of AP courses or IB diploma > cherry-picked AP courses > cherry picked IB courses.
The whole of IB is greater than the sum of its parts. The benefit of IB is the holistic approach, and the peer group provided by school-within-a school environment. It’s really not unlike the AAP Centers that everyone strives to get their kids into.
If you are looking for college credits:
DE > AP > IB
I think most college-bound kids in FCPS should be targeting DE.
What’s a full slate of AP courses?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all are still bickering and I’m not sure OP
has even come back.
🤣 OP here. I've been reading but this thread is...a lot
I'm not sure what else to ask other than: why do people keep mentioning the inability to do IB and take extra curriculars. I'm big on the idea that kids should have well rounded school experiences. Is the extra coursework in IB problems so great that kids can't have outside activities. That doesn't sound like a great trade off but I could be misunderstanding.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all are still bickering and I’m not sure OP
has even come back.
🤣 OP here. I've been reading but this thread is...a lot
I'm not sure what else to ask other than: why do people keep mentioning the inability to do IB and take extra curriculars. I'm big on the idea that kids should have well rounded school experiences. Is the extra coursework in IB problems so great that kids can't have outside activities. That doesn't sound like a great trade off but I could be misunderstanding.
Anonymous wrote:You all are still bickering and I’m not sure OP
has even come back.