Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Columbia is for tools that didn’t get into Princeton.
Nah.
https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Columbia+University+in+the+City+of+New+York&with=Princeton+University
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you apply to Barnard and Columbia.
Rejected by Columbia but got in Barnard.
You still claim Columbia.
That's a fraud.
But not if you say Barnard College of Columbia University. That is truth. Or Barnard College, Columbia University. That is how they are instructed to list it (I recently saw a resume) and asked about the relationship.
Anonymous wrote:So you apply to Barnard and Columbia.
Rejected by Columbia but got in Barnard.
You still claim Columbia.
That's a fraud.
Anonymous wrote:It is interesting that in the 1980s Columbia had a 65% admit rate while Barnard had a 50% admit rate. NO ONE wanted to go to college in Harlem (really Morningside Heights).
Anyway, Barnard was/is still the easier admit. Sister went there back then, she never could have swung an Ivy acceptance but my whole family referred to it as Ivy/Columbia just to make her feel better and bc I was at an Ivy.
It’s a good school that is just outside Ivy caliber. Diploma says BC of CU.
The actual school is across Broadway so not inside the Columbia quad fyi.
Anonymous wrote:Barnard College students attend Columbia University, just like Harvard College students attend Harvard University.
Students should say they attend "Barnard", "Barnard, Columbia", or "Columbia-Barnard".
Nobody worth talking to looks down on Barnard. Only envious losers do, especially people afraid of women.
https://barnard.edu/boldly-barnard/columbia-university
in your mind, not at Barnard College “ Barnard accepts applications from those who consistently live and identify as women. To be considered for admission, application materials should support this self-identification.” In other words, if your transcript says you are female you can apply. Do you think they need to do physical exams, too?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It has the same number of lunatic, pro-Hamas rabble-rousers.
Might even have a higher percentage? Women's colleges are pretty radical these days.
So radical that you don’t even need to be female to get admitted anymore. Because “women’s colleges” are now inclusive….of males!
Sooooooo freaking progressive, ladies! Sooooo liberated…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Columbia is for tools that didn’t get into Princeton.
Nah.
https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Columbia+University+in+the+City+of+New+York&with=Princeton+University
By parchment’s own admission their confidence level is not statistically significant
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Columbia is for tools that didn’t get into Princeton.
Nah.
https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Columbia+University+in+the+City+of+New+York&with=Princeton+University
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It has the same number of lunatic, pro-Hamas rabble-rousers.
Might even have a higher percentage? Women's colleges are pretty radical these days.