Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:College basketball superstar Caitlin Clark is set to soar to new heights in the WNBA — but her rookie contract will see her pocket a fraction of the millions her male counterparts have made on the court.
The University of Iowa legend, who has already made history as the NCAA Division I basketball’s overall top scorer, sealed a contract with the Indiana Fever after she was selected as the No. 1 overall pick in the WNBA draft Monday.
The contract will see Clark earn $338,056 over the course of four years, according to the WNBA’s collective bargaining agreement…
… For comparison, San Antonio Spurs rookie star Victor Wembanyama — the No. 1 pick in last year’s NBA draft — secured a $55 million four-year contract that saw him pocket $12.1 million in his first season, according to athlete contract tracker Spotrac.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/sports/gap-caitlin-clarks-wnba-salary-male-counterparts-draws-outrage-rcna148024
So what should happen? The men do have double the number of games but the per game price is not close.
Unpopular opinion: The problem isn't her salary. It's the ridiculous salaries we pay the men. To play a game.
Anonymous wrote:College basketball superstar Caitlin Clark is set to soar to new heights in the WNBA — but her rookie contract will see her pocket a fraction of the millions her male counterparts have made on the court.
The University of Iowa legend, who has already made history as the NCAA Division I basketball’s overall top scorer, sealed a contract with the Indiana Fever after she was selected as the No. 1 overall pick in the WNBA draft Monday.
The contract will see Clark earn $338,056 over the course of four years, according to the WNBA’s collective bargaining agreement…
… For comparison, San Antonio Spurs rookie star Victor Wembanyama — the No. 1 pick in last year’s NBA draft — secured a $55 million four-year contract that saw him pocket $12.1 million in his first season, according to athlete contract tracker Spotrac.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/sports/gap-caitlin-clarks-wnba-salary-male-counterparts-draws-outrage-rcna148024
So what should happen? The men do have double the number of games but the per game price is not close.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one wants to watch women play basketball. No one wants to watch women play football. I think the women are getting paid just fine considering it’s like a hobby for them. I expect everyone that is complaining actually go to the games to support them and buy their merch. If not, sit down.
Remind me again, what was the highest rated basketball game this year?
The reality is there are a group of people that prefer college basketball over the NBA because There’s both offense and defense.
Women’s WNBA is more like men’s college basketball then NBA which is boring AF
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one wants to watch women play basketball. No one wants to watch women play football. I think the women are getting paid just fine considering it’s like a hobby for them. I expect everyone that is complaining actually go to the games to support them and buy their merch. If not, sit down.
Remind me again, what was the highest rated basketball game this year?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one wants to watch women play basketball. No one wants to watch women play football. I think the women are getting paid just fine considering it’s like a hobby for them. I expect everyone that is complaining actually go to the games to support them and buy their merch. If not, sit down.
Remind me again, what was the highest rated basketball game this year?
Anonymous wrote:No one wants to watch women play basketball. No one wants to watch women play football. I think the women are getting paid just fine considering it’s like a hobby for them. I expect everyone that is complaining actually go to the games to support them and buy their merch. If not, sit down.
Anonymous wrote:Lost in all of this discussion is that the folks in charge of promoting the WNBA seem to go out of their way to do the opposite.
There was a story recently of players live-streaming a game on X that was not available on TV anywhere through any platform because the folks running WNBA TV assumed no one would watch (this in an era when I can livestream lower tier 14U AAU games played in rural PA). The players’ streams both got up to like 1M views. The next day, the league announced that preseason games would be on TV going forward.
The truth is that people will watch sports that are promoted and taken seriously by networks. See college softball - to me, not that compelling to watch, but it’s on TV constantly.
So far, with both NCAAW and WNBA, networks seem to go out of their way to devalue, hide, and denigrate the product. I’m a middle aged dude and hardly a crusader for equity, but the business stupidity here makes my head explode. WNBA salaries would be much higher if the league were marketed halfway intelligently.