Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ANY sort of conspicuous consumption. Lulu, stanley, LV, Tesla, fancy kitchens.
Teslas are actually practical.
Also odd that Lulu is on this list. I mean I guess I could do a bunch of research to find athleticwear that performs as well but costs less, but why? How much time spent to save $30?
And as for “fancy” kitchens….most people do not spend lots of money on kitchens for them to be impractical. The better appliances perform better, and yes, tend to look nicer. This is for the space that is the beating heart of my private residence that the public does not see. How is that “conspicuous consumption”?
Right, so in those categories you would fall into the "others think are desirable" part of the OP. Its literally the point of the thread.
Anonymous wrote:I get frustrated with the bells and whistles I have to buy when all I really want is something solid and reliable. Like I wouldn't mind a great luxury car if I could get it without the stupid wood paneling, etc. I bought a NordicTrack treadmill because I wanted a treadmill that would last, and have automatic speed and incline controls. I didn't want the stupid fancy screen with iFit. I love to spend money on solid Amish furniture but I don't want some fancy Chairish dining room table. I want to be able to excise the snooty and fancy but keep the quality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with many of these - kids, expensive or luxury bags/shoes/cars/etc.
I honestly don't care for luxury anything in terms of "stuff" or material things. I'd rather have a nice experience or trip.
Sorry but kids are nothing like these other items. They are actually the opposite.
Sorry but I don't think you understand the question. Kids are something many people want/desire, but are not something I desire/want any more than I desire a porche.
Yes. And the fact that you think of “Porsche” and “child” in equivalent terms reveals that you have no idea what having a kid is. It’s fine not to want kids but know it’s bypassing a whole category of human experience, not akin to skipping a splurge purchase.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ANY sort of conspicuous consumption. Lulu, stanley, LV, Tesla, fancy kitchens.
Teslas are actually practical.
Also odd that Lulu is on this list. I mean I guess I could do a bunch of research to find athleticwear that performs as well but costs less, but why? How much time spent to save $30?
And as for “fancy” kitchens….most people do not spend lots of money on kitchens for them to be impractical. The better appliances perform better, and yes, tend to look nicer. This is for the space that is the beating heart of my private residence that the public does not see. How is that “conspicuous consumption”?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ANY sort of conspicuous consumption. Lulu, stanley, LV, Tesla, fancy kitchens.
Teslas are actually practical.
Tesla aren't practical. Maybe when you can drive them 1000 miles without stopping for a charge. And when they get the battery fires under control. Hard pass.
They are actually practical if you have the free lifetime supercharging. We don't usually drive them 1000 miles but if we did, we'd just stop for a meal. Don't know anyone who has had a fire. We've owned 3 and haven't had any issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ANY sort of conspicuous consumption. Lulu, stanley, LV, Tesla, fancy kitchens.
Teslas are actually practical.
Anonymous wrote:Large houses. I truly do not understand the appeal. We are looking to move in the next few years and our budget is such that in our preferred neighborhoods, we could either buy something smaller for cash or mostly cash, or we could get a large house and pay about what we currently pay. The realtor and my mom and several friends keep telling me "just get the bigger house, you won't regret it" but I really don't want to. We have plenty of space now at less than 1500 sq ft. I don't think I want something more than 2000 sq ft. What is it for? I also don't want to furnish and design and decorate all that extra space. We only have one kid and she'll be in MS by the time we move. The idea of some 3000-4000 sq ft house sounds like way too much for a small family, much less empty nesters. I value good layout (or getting a great price and then being able to spend money to renovate it to make the absolute most of it) over extra square footage, but the market really seems geared toward the idea that larger houses are always better. They definitely seem to appreciate better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with many of these - kids, expensive or luxury bags/shoes/cars/etc.
I honestly don't care for luxury anything in terms of "stuff" or material things. I'd rather have a nice experience or trip.
Sorry but kids are nothing like these other items. They are actually the opposite.
Sorry but I don't think you understand the question. Kids are something many people want/desire, but are not something I desire/want any more than I desire a porche.
Kids are the ultimate experience, not a “luxury item”. Strange that the pp lumped them together.
+1. People without kids just will never get it.
-1 I have kids and disagree that they re the “ultimate experience “.
Your poor kids. I pity them.
Anonymous wrote:Stanley cup
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most of mine have been taken, but I'll say additional responsibility at work or higher titles. I've reached a stage where I'm content with my work life balance and compensation and I just want to carry on with regular cost of living raises. Unfortunately, that's frowned upon and I'm supposed to keep striving for more
Ugh same here. I don’t want to get promoted, I just want to keep on keeping on. I don’t more money, just to keep making roughly the same accounting for inflation. But you’re not allowed to say that at performance reviews.
I'm one of these people too. Just let me coast. I'm very happy that way.
Anonymous wrote:Designer bags that cost 5 figures and require the buyer to jump through hoops to buy.