Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you don't understand the difference between "special treatment" and "special needs" that's on you. And blanket claim "she's bad with students who are not NT period" just shows how some critics try to unfairly project their individual feelings onto the masses. I think Dr. B is a hardworking, caring educator. She cares about ALL the kids - every single one, regardless of ability or who their parents are. And yes, it is unfortunate so much money meant for education ends up getting spent on litigation. But that's not Dr. B's fault - she upholds DC policy and law; she doesn't make it. And how have those lawsuits gone? Honest question.
She absolutely did not care about my autistic child. And the hearing officer in our due process case agreed.
Unlikely that a hearing officer found the principal "did not care." But great that you were able to get a successful outcome for your child! Dr. B has faults like everyone else, but no need to vilify her. She is a mom too. Of course she cares about children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you don't understand the difference between "special treatment" and "special needs" that's on you. And blanket claim "she's bad with students who are not NT period" just shows how some critics try to unfairly project their individual feelings onto the masses. I think Dr. B is a hardworking, caring educator. She cares about ALL the kids - every single one, regardless of ability or who their parents are. And yes, it is unfortunate so much money meant for education ends up getting spent on litigation. But that's not Dr. B's fault - she upholds DC policy and law; she doesn't make it. And how have those lawsuits gone? Honest question.
She absolutely did not care about my autistic child. And the hearing officer in our due process case agreed.
Unlikely that a hearing officer found the principal "did not care." But great that you were able to get a successful outcome for your child! Dr. B has faults like everyone else, but no need to vilify her. She is a mom too. Of course she cares about children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you don't understand the difference between "special treatment" and "special needs" that's on you. And blanket claim "she's bad with students who are not NT period" just shows how some critics try to unfairly project their individual feelings onto the masses. I think Dr. B is a hardworking, caring educator. She cares about ALL the kids - every single one, regardless of ability or who their parents are. And yes, it is unfortunate so much money meant for education ends up getting spent on litigation. But that's not Dr. B's fault - she upholds DC policy and law; she doesn't make it. And how have those lawsuits gone? Honest question.
She absolutely did not care about my autistic child. And the hearing officer in our due process case agreed.
Anonymous wrote:Dr. B cares and does what is best for ALL the kids. Many detractors wanted special treatment for their individual child and were told no. That upsets parents and many hold grudges. But that doesn't make her a bad principal. As for teacher turnover, c'mon. Pick up a newspaper or google teacher shortage. Or maybe look in the mirror and think 'maybe it wasn't just the principal that drove teachers away from Lafayette?'
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you don't understand the difference between "special treatment" and "special needs" that's on you. And blanket claim "she's bad with students who are not NT period" just shows how some critics try to unfairly project their individual feelings onto the masses. I think Dr. B is a hardworking, caring educator. She cares about ALL the kids - every single one, regardless of ability or who their parents are. And yes, it is unfortunate so much money meant for education ends up getting spent on litigation. But that's not Dr. B's fault - she upholds DC policy and law; she doesn't make it. And how have those lawsuits gone? Honest question.
Honest answer: private placement due to failure to provide FAPE.
Anonymous wrote:If you don't understand the difference between "special treatment" and "special needs" that's on you. And blanket claim "she's bad with students who are not NT period" just shows how some critics try to unfairly project their individual feelings onto the masses. I think Dr. B is a hardworking, caring educator. She cares about ALL the kids - every single one, regardless of ability or who their parents are. And yes, it is unfortunate so much money meant for education ends up getting spent on litigation. But that's not Dr. B's fault - she upholds DC policy and law; she doesn't make it. And how have those lawsuits gone? Honest question.
Anonymous wrote:If you don't understand the difference between "special treatment" and "special needs" that's on you. And blanket claim "she's bad with students who are not NT period" just shows how some critics try to unfairly project their individual feelings onto the masses. I think Dr. B is a hardworking, caring educator. She cares about ALL the kids - every single one, regardless of ability or who their parents are. And yes, it is unfortunate so much money meant for education ends up getting spent on litigation. But that's not Dr. B's fault - she upholds DC policy and law; she doesn't make it. And how have those lawsuits gone? Honest question.
Anonymous wrote:Dr. B cares and does what is best for ALL the kids. Many detractors wanted special treatment for their individual child and were told no. That upsets parents and many hold grudges. But that doesn't make her a bad principal. As for teacher turnover, c'mon. Pick up a newspaper or google teacher shortage. Or maybe look in the mirror and think 'maybe it wasn't just the principal that drove teachers away from Lafayette?'
Anonymous wrote:Dr. B cares and does what is best for ALL the kids. Many detractors wanted special treatment for their individual child and were told no. That upsets parents and many hold grudges. But that doesn't make her a bad principal. As for teacher turnover, c'mon. Pick up a newspaper or google teacher shortage. Or maybe look in the mirror and think 'maybe it wasn't just the principal that drove teachers away from Lafayette?'
Anonymous wrote:
She is very good with logistics, organization, and dealing with Central Office. But she also has a lot of faults and we are not sorry to see her go.
Anonymous wrote:Taking a job like this if asked by DCPS is the fastest path to an IS job if you can hack it for a few years & leave things better than you found them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Lafayette parent community has a loud, obnoxious minority of parents that are just plain toxic. They are smug, upper middle class professionals who want a sweet, elementary school experience like they had in the 1970s and are so oblivious that they don't have any understanding of how education has advanced since then.
I distinctly remember the strong pushback when Dr. Broquard instituted a system of assessing reading levels in the early grades and parents insisted that this was too much testing - they believed that their privileged kids could read why should anyone be tested to identify kids who are falling behind? It was so unbelievably self-absorbed and selfish - and stupid because I'm sure some of those kids had undiagnosed gaps in their skills. As a parent whose child was moving from another school which had already modernized its approach to education, it was shocking how behind the times the place was when Dr. B started.
You can make the case for a small group of loud parents protesting change - but it's been a decade. None of those parents have kids there anymore. And yet, she is still reviled and teacher turnover remains high.
Maybe the chaos at Miner is such that she will be a breath of fresh air. She has upsides: good with logistics and large-scale plans, good communicator (she knows how to write and spell), generally organized, and seemingly liked by DCPS admin. In which case, this could be a net benefit. But I don't think there are too many teachers or parents at Lafayette who aren't happy to be welcoming in someone new.