As a parent and community member, I value the public school system. And I don’t want the voucher-pushing RWNJs to trash them.
You're the jerk for believing non-white kids are the only ones who misbehave in school and that's why we can't have real discipline in schools.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay teachers more. Better pay = better teachers.
I think the funds would be better spent by reducing the credentials needed for teaching to a 2-year vocational program, reducing teacher compensation by 35%-50%, but then hiring twice to three times as many teachers to reduce class sizes to no more than 15 kids per class.
Which is to say that academic outcomes will improve more with a greater number of less-qualified teachers, than with fewer but higher-qualified teachers.
Peer reviewed research does not support this approach. I'm not interested in having my kid taught by someone making 30k per year, who can't afford to either live near school or have decent transportation.
The correlation between class size and results is also low.
Peer-reviewed research is how we got in this mess. We are up to our neck in peer-reviewed research, almost all of which is going to recommend Leftist solutions whether the data points that way or not.
What we lack are consequences for parents and kids who cause problems & don’t take opportunities seriously. And I don’t need a mountain of data to tell me that.
That’s racist.
Right. Because only non-white kids misbehave in school. Jerk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay teachers more. Better pay = better teachers.
I think the funds would be better spent by reducing the credentials needed for teaching to a 2-year vocational program, reducing teacher compensation by 35%-50%, but then hiring twice to three times as many teachers to reduce class sizes to no more than 15 kids per class.
Which is to say that academic outcomes will improve more with a greater number of less-qualified teachers, than with fewer but higher-qualified teachers.
Peer reviewed research does not support this approach. I'm not interested in having my kid taught by someone making 30k per year, who can't afford to either live near school or have decent transportation.
The correlation between class size and results is also low.
Peer-reviewed research is how we got in this mess. We are up to our neck in peer-reviewed research, almost all of which is going to recommend Leftist solutions whether the data points that way or not.
What we lack are consequences for parents and kids who cause problems & don’t take opportunities seriously. And I don’t need a mountain of data to tell me that.
That’s racist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay teachers more. Better pay = better teachers.
+1 million
No vouchers. They will only hurt our public schools.
Afraid of a little competition?
As a parent and community member, I value the public school system. And I don’t want the voucher-pushing RWNJs to trash them.
We need a return to true liberalism. Wokeism is racing us to the bottom.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get that rich people and corporations don't want to pay taxes and that is a big republican goal, but, isn't worth America looking like a third world idiocracy all the time. Atleast we dun got electrolytes.
PISA and other OECD data say that the US spends more $ per student on public education than many other countries which have much better educational outcomes.
As another example, DCPS spends more per student than many other cities and even most of the 50 states, yet DC ranks near the bottom of the US in educational outcomes.
We need more effective approaches to education. Increasing the spend blindly - without also fixing the educational approach at the same time - cannot succeed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get that rich people and corporations don't want to pay taxes and that is a big republican goal, but, isn't worth America looking like a third world idiocracy all the time. Atleast we dun got electrolytes.
PISA and other OECD data say that the US spends more $ per student on public education than many other countries which have much better educational outcomes.
As another example, DCPS spends more per student than many other cities and even most of the 50 states, yet DC ranks near the bottom of the US in educational outcomes.
We need more effective approaches to education. Increasing the spend blindly - without also fixing the educational approach at the same time - cannot succeed.
Anonymous wrote:I get that rich people and corporations don't want to pay taxes and that is a big republican goal, but, isn't worth America looking like a third world idiocracy all the time. Atleast we dun got electrolytes.
Anonymous wrote:The future of education depends on whether we install King Trump or any other Republican.
God help us if they win.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay teachers more. Better pay = better teachers.
And give them a 401k instead of those fat pensions.
The fat pensions are gone
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Give up and be okay with the idea that you can’t treat everyone equitably. If kids can’t behave in a classroom setting, they need to removed from said classroom. Screw their fair and adequate education. Mainly focus on those who want to learn.
This is the main thing that would improve schools dramatically. Get disruptive kids out. If they don’t want to be there they shouldn’t be there. If their parents want them in school, they can teach them to behave.
They could learn at an on the job program to do useful things like fix roads.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay teachers more. Better pay = better teachers.
And give them a 401k instead of those fat pensions.