Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Small point, but they do, in fact, teach Latin at Banneker.
This thread suddenly turned into misinformation zone. Don't rely on it for real information about Banneker, folks.
Also, I’m fairly certain they teach AP physics and chemistry, at least on a rotating basis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Small point, but they do, in fact, teach Latin at Banneker.
This thread suddenly turned into misinformation zone. Don't rely on it for real information about Banneker, folks.
Anonymous wrote:Small point, but they do, in fact, teach Latin at Banneker.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why Banneker bothers with IB Diploma. Sheesh.
As long as enough kids want to do it, why would they shut it down? The top IB kids have great college outcomes (and for middle class and poorer kids that often means a full ride, too). Plus many people believe the IB curriculum is inherently valuable. And if you don’t feel that way, just do the AP track.
But if it is only 20 kids per class doing IB, how many are the top kids? Maybe 5 or 6. So if you mean there are 5 or 6 kids each year who do very well on the IB track and have excellent college outcomes , that’s good but wouldn’t it make more sense to just make it an AP school and offer more AP classes so overall more kids benefit and have excellent college outcomes. In other words, is a tiny IB program the best way to allocate scarce resources in a public school system? Perhaps the answer is yes but it is a question worth asking and knowing DCPS, it is unlikely they reflect on optimization
+1. AP offerings are lacking. IB offerings are lacking. Just focus on AP and offer more classes for the majority. Only 40% of AP offerings is pretty low and the AP STEM offerings subpar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why Banneker bothers with IB Diploma. Sheesh.
As long as enough kids want to do it, why would they shut it down? The top IB kids have great college outcomes (and for middle class and poorer kids that often means a full ride, too). Plus many people believe the IB curriculum is inherently valuable. And if you don’t feel that way, just do the AP track.
Um, because IBD is a very expensive program. Do it right or don't bother with the window dressing. The enrollment and exam fees to Geneva alone run public schools tens of thousands of dollars a year. Why not funnel the money into a more robust AP program, with more than one AP science, BC Calc, more than two languages taught.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why Banneker bothers with IB Diploma. Sheesh.
As long as enough kids want to do it, why would they shut it down? The top IB kids have great college outcomes (and for middle class and poorer kids that often means a full ride, too). Plus many people believe the IB curriculum is inherently valuable. And if you don’t feel that way, just do the AP track.
But if it is only 20 kids per class doing IB, how many are the top kids? Maybe 5 or 6. So if you mean there are 5 or 6 kids each year who do very well on the IB track and have excellent college outcomes , that’s good but wouldn’t it make more sense to just make it an AP school and offer more AP classes so overall more kids benefit and have excellent college outcomes. In other words, is a tiny IB program the best way to allocate scarce resources in a public school system? Perhaps the answer is yes but it is a question worth asking and knowing DCPS, it is unlikely they reflect on optimization
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why Banneker bothers with IB Diploma. Sheesh.
As long as enough kids want to do it, why would they shut it down? The top IB kids have great college outcomes (and for middle class and poorer kids that often means a full ride, too). Plus many people believe the IB curriculum is inherently valuable. And if you don’t feel that way, just do the AP track.
But if it is only 20 kids per class doing IB, how many are the top kids? Maybe 5 or 6. So if you mean there are 5 or 6 kids each year who do very well on the IB track and have excellent college outcomes , that’s good but wouldn’t it make more sense to just make it an AP school and offer more AP classes so overall more kids benefit and have excellent college outcomes. In other words, is a tiny IB program the best way to allocate scarce resources in a public school system? Perhaps the answer is yes but it is a question worth asking and knowing DCPS, it is unlikely they reflect on optimization
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why Banneker bothers with IB Diploma. Sheesh.
As long as enough kids want to do it, why would they shut it down? The top IB kids have great college outcomes (and for middle class and poorer kids that often means a full ride, too). Plus many people believe the IB curriculum is inherently valuable. And if you don’t feel that way, just do the AP track.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why Banneker bothers with IB Diploma. Sheesh.
As long as enough kids want to do it, why would they shut it down? The top IB kids have great college outcomes (and for middle class and poorer kids that often means a full ride, too). Plus many people believe the IB curriculum is inherently valuable. And if you don’t feel that way, just do the AP track.
Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why Banneker bothers with IB Diploma. Sheesh.
Anonymous wrote:As a matter of fact, IBD Higher Level classes--at least three of the two-year classes are required for a student to be on track to earn the Diploma--are pitched a year or two past AP.
I asked the question of a Banneker admin in my parent interview. I was told that few students per cohort are willing to pursue the Diploma because of "all of the extra work involved," like researching and writing the Extended Essay, doing the volunteer work (to meet the Community Action Service requirement) and taking the Theory of Knowledge Class. When I asked what the average points total had been for IBDs at Banneker in the last few years, I was told (by proud admin) in the high 20s. That's about a C- in IBD terms, maybe a D+. DCI is already posting better IBD results, in the low 30s. But then DCI has the advantage of far more advanced language instruction than Banneker.