Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Make abortion a federal right until 16 weeks. If states want more than that, that’s their issue and they can decide for the voters of that state. But everyone gets 16 weeks, minimum.

Problem solved.

Not even close to problem solved. I had a friend whose baby died at 22 weeks. There was no heartbeat.

If 16 weeks was the law she would have been required to keep the dead baby inside her until the decomposition caused sepsis and posed an immediate risk to her life. That’s barbaric.

That is the dumbest post I’ve read here in a long time.

Literally NO ONE is requiring anyone to keep a DEAD baby inside them until it rots.

You. Are. A. Liar.

NP - this is literally happening right now in this country. Did you bother to read the articles posted by pps? You are so willfully ignorant you'd rather stick your head in the sand and call everyone else a liar when its happening all around you.

I read the articles. Which woman couldn’t get an abortion when the fetus no longer had a heartbeat?

Texas today.

Link?

Have you been in a coma for the last few years?

Google…

Marlena Stell

Kate Cox Had to go to court to get medical care

Nancy Davis

Deborah Dorbert Forced to carry fetus with missing organs


This one is a fun one https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-family-of-5-with-funeral-for-twin

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Make abortion a federal right until 16 weeks. If states want more than that, that’s their issue and they can decide for the voters of that state. But everyone gets 16 weeks, minimum.

Problem solved.

Not even close to problem solved. I had a friend whose baby died at 22 weeks. There was no heartbeat.

If 16 weeks was the law she would have been required to keep the dead baby inside her until the decomposition caused sepsis and posed an immediate risk to her life. That’s barbaric.

That is the dumbest post I’ve read here in a long time.

Literally NO ONE is requiring anyone to keep a DEAD baby inside them until it rots.

You. Are. A. Liar.

NP - this is literally happening right now in this country. Did you bother to read the articles posted by pps? You are so willfully ignorant you'd rather stick your head in the sand and call everyone else a liar when its happening all around you.

I read the articles. Which woman couldn’t get an abortion when the fetus no longer had a heartbeat?

Texas today.

Link?

Anonymous wrote:Once again the party of tolerance is not tolerating those with different viewpoints. I'm completely disgusted of how you talk about other people. Proud of my governor, proud of these kids marching for life, and will pray for all of you to have a change of heart. All life is sacred from conception to natural death. And yes, I'm an educated, successful women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My first thought about this is everything lives on the internet forever and there's no doubt in my mind this will be a regret for these boys in the future.

Why?

I wouldn’t hire them

That’s because you won’t have the ability to. You will work for them.

Sounds like the O'Connell kids are back from Richmond, trolling a mommy website during lunch.

You aren't mature/informed enough to have an adult conversation, let alone make healthcare decisions for millions of women.

Never heard that playground retort before. Very original.

How else would you explain the earlier comment that sounds immature even for a HS student? Maybe a MS student?

Calling anyone and everyone immature who has different views and opinions from you doesn’t make them immature. It indicates you are in fact the immature one.

A: this will be a regret for these boys in the future.
B: Why?
A: I wouldn’t hire them
B: That’s because you won’t have the ability to. You will work for them.

That's not a "different view or opinion". That's simply a childish remark.

Not to mention, there are "different" views and there are INVALID ones. These people at these marches have views that are invalid. We're fine to disregard them and ridicule those people for having them.

Keep raging over things and people you can’t control. It’s funny.

Raging all the way to the poll, baby. Vote them neanderthals out.

M’eh, you’d still vote the same exact way even if all abortion up to full term was the law of the land. Let’s not pretend you’d be voting Republican except for abortion. Abortion doesn’t change anything. You’re just an ordinary leftist. You’d vote the same way no matter what.

There is no such thing as "abortion up to full term". At full term, it's delivery.

Ask former Virginia Governor Dr. Ralph “Blackface” Northam (D) about how to perform abortions after the baby has been born.

Or Dr Kermit Gossnell.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We should also castrate men who make any single women pregnant. I think it will be equitable. Men can only make their legally wedded wives pregnant.

Outlaw all abortion and you’ve got yourself a deal. I’m totally fine with that. 100% fine. Completely support it.

Anonymous wrote:We should also castrate men who make any single women pregnant. I think it will be equitable. Men can only make their legally wedded wives pregnant.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Make abortion a federal right until 16 weeks. If states want more than that, that’s their issue and they can decide for the voters of that state. But everyone gets 16 weeks, minimum.

Problem solved.

Not even close to problem solved. I had a friend whose baby died at 22 weeks. There was no heartbeat.

If 16 weeks was the law she would have been required to keep the dead baby inside her until the decomposition caused sepsis and posed an immediate risk to her life. That’s barbaric.

That is the dumbest post I’ve read here in a long time.

Literally NO ONE is requiring anyone to keep a DEAD baby inside them until it rots.

You. Are. A. Liar.

NP - this is literally happening right now in this country. Did you bother to read the articles posted by pps? You are so willfully ignorant you'd rather stick your head in the sand and call everyone else a liar when its happening all around you.

I read the articles. Which woman couldn’t get an abortion when the fetus no longer had a heartbeat?

Texas today.

Anonymous wrote:We should also castrate men who make any single women pregnant. I think it will be equitable. Men can only make their legally wedded wives pregnant.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Make abortion a federal right until 16 weeks. If states want more than that, that’s their issue and they can decide for the voters of that state. But everyone gets 16 weeks, minimum.

Problem solved.

Not even close to problem solved. I had a friend whose baby died at 22 weeks. There was no heartbeat.

If 16 weeks was the law she would have been required to keep the dead baby inside her until the decomposition caused sepsis and posed an immediate risk to her life. That’s barbaric.

People who advocate for a ban after 16 weeks either don't know anything about why women have abortions, or they don't care.

We certainly know why they have them before 16 weeks though.

Yes, we do. These reasons include:

-having a child would interfere with the woman's education, work, or ability to care for dependents
-the woman can't afford a baby now
-the woman does not want to be a single mother or is having relationship problems
-the woman has completed her childbearing and does not want more children
-the woman is not ready to have a child

Now, you may not think those are good reasons, but unless it's your uterus, your opinion is irrelevant.

So in other words, mostly it’s for sake of convenience, and an absence of forethought to use birth control or a morning after pill.

Cool. Then your abortion should also come with a mandatory tubal ligation, so you never need to worry about a baby cramping your style again. If I were in charge that’s exactly what the law would be.

You can still have your abortion for sake of convenience, but you’ll never carry another child again after that.

Yes, I'm sure you would, because it's actually not about babies for you, it's about controlling women's bodies and women's lives.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Make abortion a federal right until 16 weeks. If states want more than that, that’s their issue and they can decide for the voters of that state. But everyone gets 16 weeks, minimum.

Problem solved.

Not even close to problem solved. I had a friend whose baby died at 22 weeks. There was no heartbeat.

If 16 weeks was the law she would have been required to keep the dead baby inside her until the decomposition caused sepsis and posed an immediate risk to her life. That’s barbaric.

That is the dumbest post I’ve read here in a long time.

Literally NO ONE is requiring anyone to keep a DEAD baby inside them until it rots.

You. Are. A. Liar.

NP - this is literally happening right now in this country. Did you bother to read the articles posted by pps? You are so willfully ignorant you'd rather stick your head in the sand and call everyone else a liar when its happening all around you.

I read the articles. Which woman couldn’t get an abortion when the fetus no longer had a heartbeat?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Make abortion a federal right until 16 weeks. If states want more than that, that’s their issue and they can decide for the voters of that state. But everyone gets 16 weeks, minimum.

Problem solved.

Not even close to problem solved. I had a friend whose baby died at 22 weeks. There was no heartbeat.

If 16 weeks was the law she would have been required to keep the dead baby inside her until the decomposition caused sepsis and posed an immediate risk to her life. That’s barbaric.

That is the dumbest post I’ve read here in a long time.

Literally NO ONE is requiring anyone to keep a DEAD baby inside them until it rots.

You. Are. A. Liar.

NP - this is literally happening right now in this country. Did you bother to read the articles posted by pps? You are so willfully ignorant you'd rather stick your head in the sand and call everyone else a liar when its happening all around you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Make abortion a federal right until 16 weeks. If states want more than that, that’s their issue and they can decide for the voters of that state. But everyone gets 16 weeks, minimum.

Problem solved.

Not even close to problem solved. I had a friend whose baby died at 22 weeks. There was no heartbeat.

If 16 weeks was the law she would have been required to keep the dead baby inside her until the decomposition caused sepsis and posed an immediate risk to her life. That’s barbaric.

People who advocate for a ban after 16 weeks either don't know anything about why women have abortions, or they don't care.

We certainly know why they have them before 16 weeks though.

Yes, we do. These reasons include:

-having a child would interfere with the woman's education, work, or ability to care for dependents
-the woman can't afford a baby now
-the woman does not want to be a single mother or is having relationship problems
-the woman has completed her childbearing and does not want more children
-the woman is not ready to have a child

Now, you may not think those are good reasons, but unless it's your uterus, your opinion is irrelevant.

So in other words, mostly it’s for sake of convenience, and an absence of forethought to use birth control or a morning after pill.

Cool. Then your abortion should also come with a mandatory tubal ligation, so you never need to worry about a baby cramping your style again. If I were in charge that’s exactly what the law would be.

You can still have your abortion for sake of convenience, but you’ll never carry another child again after that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Make abortion a federal right until 16 weeks. If states want more than that, that’s their issue and they can decide for the voters of that state. But everyone gets 16 weeks, minimum.

Problem solved.

Not even close to problem solved. I had a friend whose baby died at 22 weeks. There was no heartbeat.

If 16 weeks was the law she would have been required to keep the dead baby inside her until the decomposition caused sepsis and posed an immediate risk to her life. That’s barbaric.

People who advocate for a ban after 16 weeks either don't know anything about why women have abortions, or they don't care.

We certainly know why they have them before 16 weeks though.

Yes, we do. These reasons include:

-having a child would interfere with the woman's education, work, or ability to care for dependents
-the woman can't afford a baby now
-the woman does not want to be a single mother or is having relationship problems
-the woman has completed her childbearing and does not want more children
-the woman is not ready to have a child

Now, you may not think those are good reasons, but unless it's your uterus, your opinion is irrelevant.

So in other words, mostly it’s for sake of convenience, and an absence of forethought to use birth control or a morning after pill.

Cool. Then your abortion should also come with a mandatory tubal ligation, so you never need to worry about a baby cramping your style again. If I were in charge that’s exactly what the law would be.

You can still have your abortion for sake of convenience, but you’ll never carry another child again after that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Make abortion a federal right until 16 weeks. If states want more than that, that’s their issue and they can decide for the voters of that state. But everyone gets 16 weeks, minimum.

Problem solved.

Not even close to problem solved. I had a friend whose baby died at 22 weeks. There was no heartbeat.

If 16 weeks was the law she would have been required to keep the dead baby inside her until the decomposition caused sepsis and posed an immediate risk to her life. That’s barbaric.

People who advocate for a ban after 16 weeks either don't know anything about why women have abortions, or they don't care.

We certainly know why they have them before 16 weeks though.

Yes, we do. These reasons include:

-having a child would interfere with the woman's education, work, or ability to care for dependents
-the woman can't afford a baby now
-the woman does not want to be a single mother or is having relationship problems
-the woman has completed her childbearing and does not want more children
-the woman is not ready to have a child

Now, you may not think those are good reasons, but unless it's your uterus, your opinion is irrelevant.

So in other words, mostly it’s for sake of convenience, and an absence of forethought to use birth control or a morning after pill.

Cool. Then your abortion should also come with a mandatory tubal ligation, so you never need to worry about a baby cramping your style again. If I were in charge that’s exactly what the law would be.

You can still have your abortion for sake of convenience, but you’ll never carry another child again after that.