Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And do what? Her max annual lifetime earnings were $50k before this?
how is that even possible?
She made $50k per year. It’s quoted from WaPo upstream where there’s a description of the special free loan she got off the city through undue influence
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And do what? Her max annual lifetime earnings were $50k before this?
how is that even possible?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And do what? Her max annual lifetime earnings were $50k before this?
how is that even possible?
Anonymous wrote:And do what? Her max annual lifetime earnings were $50k before this?
Anonymous wrote:And do what? Her max annual lifetime earnings were $50k before this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is petty, but she keeps parking illegally and eating without paying in the local restaurants
I see her car parked illegally at least once a week, which is pretty galling from someone who demands that everyone else either ride a bike or take public transit.
True
I’ve never seen where exactly she is parking, but technically council members are exempt from parking rules if on official business, with some exceptions. So we may not like it, but it may not be illegal for her to do so.
Sorry, illegal is your measure? It’s showing lack of any values and it’s not illegal but it’s illegitimate and just plain wrong.
When people show you who they are believe them. Better believe Nadeau is in it for herself her paycheck and her perks
No, accuracy is. PP said she was parking illegally when she may not in fact be parking illegally. That’s all I was pointing out.