Anonymous wrote:"Their players" funny! The league has a high recruiting %, so nothing special about that. What do their players accomplish in college? Social media posts about committing and actually playing, having impact are different things. Most of these kids are over recruited and are not factors at these top programs. This is why you see rosters at college in the 30+ range. Take anyone who can pay then watch them wash out. Would be more impressed with you posting what those players do in college. Union has had a steady decline in results in the league the last few years and grasping for partners because they need players.
Anonymous wrote:"Their players" funny! The league has a high recruiting %, so nothing special about that. What do their players accomplish in college? Social media posts about committing and actually playing, having impact are different things. Most of these kids are over recruited and are not factors at these top programs. This is why you see rosters at college in the 30+ range. Take anyone who can pay then watch them wash out. Would be more impressed with you posting what those players do in college. Union has had a steady decline in results in the league the last few years and grasping for partners because they need players.
Anonymous wrote:McLean is a joke of a club. Should just post, please help us, send us your players. NM moving to GFR is so they can bleed another sucker club for their players. Please do all the heavy lifting from 8-12 then send them to us at UnionPartner clubs are idiots.
Partner clubs are idiots. Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Choosing GA over ECNL. Good way to lose the best players.
Think what you want, big guy. We are going to dominate this market.
The issue is this -- of the 2025 college commits for D1 -- 70% are ECNL. About 20% are GA. Can GA work for college -- yes of course. Does ECNL work better/offer a better path -- yes of course? Many players (not all) would rather be at ECNL.
ECNL dropped from 90% to 70% market share to a new competitor in just a few years? That actually sounds like pretty good traction for GA!
Anonymous wrote:On the boys side Union was just getting in the way of their MLS Next relationship. On the girls side SYC strikes me as confident(or arrogant) enough to believe it’s better to be all SYC in GA than lost as part of Union in ECNL. I don’t know the inner workings of the Club but some one there has taken an after thought Club and made it into a player the last few years. No clue if it’s been good for the kids but I bet it’s been great for bottom line.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Choosing GA over ECNL. Good way to lose the best players.
Think what you want, big guy. We are going to dominate this market.
The issue is this -- of the 2025 college commits for D1 -- 70% are ECNL. About 20% are GA. Can GA work for college -- yes of course. Does ECNL work better/offer a better path -- yes of course? Many players (not all) would rather be at ECNL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Choosing GA over ECNL. Good way to lose the best players.
Think what you want, big guy. We are going to dominate this market.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SYC would like to thank McLean/Union Soccer Club and its leadership for the incredible partnership we have enjoyed over the past 3 years. SYC could not have asked for a better club to collaborate with, and as our partnership comes to an end, we wanted to extend our heartfelt appreciation for the unwavering professionalism and support we have received from McLean/Union. Your contribution has been instrumental in our shared achievements.
SYC would like to wish McLean/Union all the best in its future endeavors.
Stay tuned for an announcement today at 12:15 pm.
Made up or actual message sent out?