Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seems like DC has just given up.
Yes. Wapo article has comments turned off and this is the final sentence "Robinson urged motorists not to leave vehicles idling, despite cold weather at this time of year." https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/01/05/child-baby-stolen-car-georgetown/
So will the person who left the baby alone in the idling car get charged with anything? Child endangeerment? Back in 2015 there were arrests when a couple left children in a car for a wine tasting https://wjla.com/amp/news/local/d-c-man-charged-with-leaving-toddlers-in-car-to-go-to-a-wine-tasting-appears-in-court-111564
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the conversation with your husband and in-laws like when you return home after having left your baby in a car that gets stolen??
+1,000
The car jackets did the right thing. But the onus is solely on the mother. Fortunately, they even left a note to help her out.
Anonymous wrote:Seems like DC has just given up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the conversation with your husband and in-laws like when you return home after having left your baby in a car that gets stolen??
+1,000
The car jackets did the right thing. But the onus is solely on the mother. Fortunately, they even left a note to help her out.
Anonymous wrote:What is the conversation with your husband and in-laws like when you return home after having left your baby in a car that gets stolen??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The baby was left in the car seat on a street in SE but the car is still missing. Curious about where/with who?
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/4-month-old-girl-found-after-being-taken-in-georgetown-car-theft/3508529/
Thank goodness she is safe.
I hope these guys get charged with kidnapping and child abuse, and get put away for a long time.
Sounds like these guys are on the loose joyriding in the jeep? At our councilmembers safety walk the USAO representative told us they can't charge carjackers cos when four sets of prints are found they don't know who the jacker was.. COMPLETE IMPUNITY and zero solutions offered.
Hope you told them what utter bullshit this was! 4sets of fingerprints? Arrest and charge them all, unless there is a reason for that fingerprint in the car. Are these people STUPID?
Anonymous wrote:Crime is out of hand in the city no doubt, but it was very irresponsible of the mother to leave the child in the car like that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The baby was left in the car seat on a street in SE but the car is still missing. Curious about where/with who?
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/4-month-old-girl-found-after-being-taken-in-georgetown-car-theft/3508529/
Thank goodness she is safe.
I hope these guys get charged with kidnapping and child abuse, and get put away for a long time.
Sounds like these guys are on the loose joyriding in the jeep? At our councilmembers safety walk the USAO representative told us they can't charge carjackers cos when four sets of prints are found they don't know who the jacker was.. COMPLETE IMPUNITY and zero solutions offered.
That really seems like laziness. If a link is found between all the suspects, clearly they all carjacked together.
Nope, not according to the communications guy from prosecution at the Council meet n' greet. We brought up carjackings (a friend of ours has been carjacked in DC), and according to the rep, "carjacking cases are very hard to prosecute because who is to say the person who is found with the car is the one who stole it?" So... they don't prosecute. Interpret that as you will.
What in the world is the logic of this? If a diamond necklace is stolen from someone and a person is found in possession of that necklace surely they can reasonably be charged with theft? Same with just about any other stolen goods. What is special about a car that we would think innocent people are just routinely driving stolen vehicles.
And why not at least charge with possession of stolen goods. If they want that charge dropped they can give a name of who they believed gave them lawful possession of the car? If you’re found with a vehicle that is stolen and you are innocent, you should have a reasonable story as to how this happened. Hand over the name.
Nope. They're like oh the car passes through many hands, who knows who stole it, oh well! When stolen cars are recovered they don't even dust them for prints (firsthand experience when we recovered our own stolen, not jacked car).
Absolutely ludicrous and preposterous! The car passes through many hands? Sure, I always gift on vehicles that are given to me for free, totally legit, I get a car, you get a car, everyone gets a car! Oh they should try this in Singapore.