Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have read a few cases where women allege this for custody. It does not end well for the women. Have you heard of the back-fire phenomenon in family court.
I am here to tell you it is real. It is alive and well. In many states judges are men. Men want to see their babies equal time. If they feel threatened they will ask for 100 percent time with their kids. You might get visitation
Do not listen to this person, who is wrong.
Good cases in your jurisdiction with these key words. Find out for yourself. Don’t take any random advice as truth
Google google cases
Once you allege a crime against a father it’s hard to undue
Anonymous wrote:I am female. Doing fine now
It was a long haul
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you say the R word, I would anticipate that the conversation will shut down
Isn’t that reasonable ? Are you expecting to have a fruitful/normal/cordial relationship (in some way) with this man again?
So she should tiptoe around what he did because he's so delicate to hear it? Eff that.
Don’t get someone down a road they can not undue in family court
Taking care of your right to your children comes first.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Wish I didn’t know
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have read a few cases where women allege this for custody. It does not end well for the women. Have you heard of the back-fire phenomenon in family court.
I am here to tell you it is real. It is alive and well. In many states judges are men. Men want to see their babies equal time. If they feel threatened they will ask for 100 percent time with their kids. You might get visitation
Do not listen to this person, who is wrong.
Good cases in your jurisdiction with these key words. Find out for yourself. Don’t take any random advice as truth
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you say the R word, I would anticipate that the conversation will shut down
Isn’t that reasonable ? Are you expecting to have a fruitful/normal/cordial relationship (in some way) with this man again?
So she should tiptoe around what he did because he's so delicate to hear it? Eff that.
Don’t get someone down a road they can not undue in family court
Taking care of your right to your children comes first.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have read a few cases where women allege this for custody. It does not end well for the women. Have you heard of the back-fire phenomenon in family court.
I am here to tell you it is real. It is alive and well. In many states judges are men. Men want to see their babies equal time. If they feel threatened they will ask for 100 percent time with their kids. You might get visitation
Do not listen to this person, who is wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you say the R word, I would anticipate that the conversation will shut down
Isn’t that reasonable ? Are you expecting to have a fruitful/normal/cordial relationship (in some way) with this man again?
So she should tiptoe around what he did because he's so delicate to hear it? Eff that.
Don’t get someone down a road they can not undue in family court
Taking care of your right to your children comes first.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you say the R word, I would anticipate that the conversation will shut down
Isn’t that reasonable ? Are you expecting to have a fruitful/normal/cordial relationship (in some way) with this man again?
So she should tiptoe around what he did because he's so delicate to hear it? Eff that.
Anonymous wrote:I have read a few cases where women allege this for custody. It does not end well for the women. Have you heard of the back-fire phenomenon in family court.
I am here to tell you it is real. It is alive and well. In many states judges are men. Men want to see their babies equal time. If they feel threatened they will ask for 100 percent time with their kids. You might get visitation