Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still want to know the technical details about how the GOP found her live stream videos.

She made these long before she ever announced her candidacy. Millions of streamers make these videos EVERYDAY that are ostensibly streamed, but not archived.

Even if if there are websites that archive every adult stream (so millions of streams per day), you still need to match a handful of archived videos with a single person running in an obscure state-level legislative race. She wasn't a national candidate.

No one has ever explained HOW they were able to pinpoint her videos. It's actually frightening and fascinating.

Not really. Everyone remembers if a neighbor, coworker, classmate, etc had a video out there. When she ran for office I'm sure someone remembered they had the video on an old drive and sent it out

I know NO ONE who has a video "out there". Are you hanging out with the Kardashians or Paris Hilton?

This isn't the early 00's. Everyone hears about who did porn or nude streaming and eventually the videos are found. It just takes mentioning it to a coworker and the next day, poof, all the guys know about it and have the videos playing on their phone. Young teachers have problems with this pretty frequently.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

The only way it was available for public viewing is that she put it on a public live stream in the first place.

+1.

PP will next claim trademark infringement or copyright violation.

The chick put videos of herself get boned on the internet. Ain't no way in hell anyone is convincing anyone she is a victim.

No, she did not “put videos of herself” on the internet. It was live streaming.

She herself freely agreed to the platform’s terms of use so she could broadcast her sexual activity for the possibility of making some money. The terms of use specifically warn that the content streamed may be recorded. She consented to the terms of use.

She knew it could be recorded.

And there are bots which record ALL of this stuff, especially bots located outside the USA.

Ever notice FaceBook’s facial recognition software? It is not new. It is simple, cheap, and available.

And yes, there HAVE been Republicans shamed over somewhat similar situations (though nothing this egregious), but they did not go blaming everyone else for their poor judgement when the truth came out.

She’s done, politically.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

The only way it was available for public viewing is that she put it on a public live stream in the first place.

+1.

PP will next claim trademark infringement or copyright violation.

The chick put videos of herself get boned on the internet. Ain't no way in hell anyone is convincing anyone she is a victim.

No, she did not “put videos of herself” on the internet. It was live streaming.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still want to know the technical details about how the GOP found her live stream videos.

She made these long before she ever announced her candidacy. Millions of streamers make these videos EVERYDAY that are ostensibly streamed, but not archived.

Even if if there are websites that archive every adult stream (so millions of streams per day), you still need to match a handful of archived videos with a single person running in an obscure state-level legislative race. She wasn't a national candidate.

No one has ever explained HOW they were able to pinpoint her videos. It's actually frightening and fascinating.

Not really. Everyone remembers if a neighbor, coworker, classmate, etc had a video out there. When she ran for office I'm sure someone remembered they had the video on an old drive and sent it out

I know NO ONE who has a video "out there". Are you hanging out with the Kardashians or Paris Hilton?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

The only way it was available for public viewing is that she put it on a public live stream in the first place.

+1.

PP will next claim trademark infringement or copyright violation.

The chick put videos of herself get boned on the internet. Ain't no way in hell anyone is convincing anyone she is a victim.

No, she did not “put videos of herself” on the internet. It was live streaming.

She herself freely agreed to the platform’s terms of use so she could broadcast her sexual activity for the possibility of making some money. The terms of use specifically warn that the content streamed may be recorded. She consented to the terms of use.

She knew it could be recorded.

And there are bots which record ALL of this stuff, especially bots located outside the USA.

Ever notice FaceBook’s facial recognition software? It is not new. It is simple, cheap, and available.

And yes, there HAVE been Republicans shamed over somewhat similar situations (though nothing this egregious), but they did not go blaming everyone else for their poor judgement when the truth came out.

She’s done, politically.

Which Republicans were shamed for similar situations?

No one will care next time she runs. She only lost by <1000 votes.

Bobert has a following on DCUM. Perhaps you have heard of her?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

The only way it was available for public viewing is that she put it on a public live stream in the first place.

+1.

PP will next claim trademark infringement or copyright violation.

The chick put videos of herself get boned on the internet. Ain't no way in hell anyone is convincing anyone she is a victim.

No, she did not “put videos of herself” on the internet. It was live streaming.

She herself freely agreed to the platform’s terms of use so she could broadcast her sexual activity for the possibility of making some money. The terms of use specifically warn that the content streamed may be recorded. She consented to the terms of use.

She knew it could be recorded.

And there are bots which record ALL of this stuff, especially bots located outside the USA.

Ever notice FaceBook’s facial recognition software? It is not new. It is simple, cheap, and available.

And yes, there HAVE been Republicans shamed over somewhat similar situations (though nothing this egregious), but they did not go blaming everyone else for their poor judgement when the truth came out.

She’s done, politically.

Which Republicans were shamed for similar situations?

No one will care next time she runs. She only lost by <1000 votes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still want to know the technical details about how the GOP found her live stream videos.

She made these long before she ever announced her candidacy. Millions of streamers make these videos EVERYDAY that are ostensibly streamed, but not archived.

Even if if there are websites that archive every adult stream (so millions of streams per day), you still need to match a handful of archived videos with a single person running in an obscure state-level legislative race. She wasn't a national candidate.

No one has ever explained HOW they were able to pinpoint her videos. It's actually frightening and fascinating.

Not really. Everyone remembers if a neighbor, coworker, classmate, etc had a video out there. When she ran for office I'm sure someone remembered they had the video on an old drive and sent it out

The odds that a neighbor, coworker, or classmate saw one of her 15 videos is infinitesimal. Millions of videos produced daily on a global basis. Times 365 days per year. And it seems that the videos were only uploaded to a public site within a few months of the election (so likely uploaded by the Republican political consultant himself).

I don't know about that. I grew up in Old Town and 'dated' Charis Van Metre (of Van Metre homes) way back in the 80s as a teenager and about 15 years later I saw her in a Playboy magazine.

Anonymous wrote:I know Gibson lost and the other thread was closed. But she just gave an interview to Politico and is framing this as a revenge porn situation. I voted for her, but didn't she willingly film herself on a porn site? I'm surprised that fact got scrubbed from this article:

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/12/09/susanna-gibson-virginia-digital-privacy-00130883

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

The only way it was available for public viewing is that she put it on a public live stream in the first place.

+1.

PP will next claim trademark infringement or copyright violation.

The chick put videos of herself get boned on the internet. Ain't no way in hell anyone is convincing anyone she is a victim.

No, she did not “put videos of herself” on the internet. It was live streaming.

She herself freely agreed to the platform’s terms of use so she could broadcast her sexual activity for the possibility of making some money. The terms of use specifically warn that the content streamed may be recorded. She consented to the terms of use.

She knew it could be recorded.

And there are bots which record ALL of this stuff, especially bots located outside the USA.

Ever notice FaceBook’s facial recognition software? It is not new. It is simple, cheap, and available.

And yes, there HAVE been Republicans shamed over somewhat similar situations (though nothing this egregious), but they did not go blaming everyone else for their poor judgement when the truth came out.

She’s done, politically.

Anonymous wrote:90% of millennials take nudes?! Really?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still want to know the technical details about how the GOP found her live stream videos.

She made these long before she ever announced her candidacy. Millions of streamers make these videos EVERYDAY that are ostensibly streamed, but not archived.

Even if if there are websites that archive every adult stream (so millions of streams per day), you still need to match a handful of archived videos with a single person running in an obscure state-level legislative race. She wasn't a national candidate.

No one has ever explained HOW they were able to pinpoint her videos. It's actually frightening and fascinating.

Actually I read she made 1-2 videos AFTER she announced her candidacy in summer of 2022. I think she did her last known live stream in September 2022.

Correct.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still want to know the technical details about how the GOP found her live stream videos.

She made these long before she ever announced her candidacy. Millions of streamers make these videos EVERYDAY that are ostensibly streamed, but not archived.

Even if if there are websites that archive every adult stream (so millions of streams per day), you still need to match a handful of archived videos with a single person running in an obscure state-level legislative race. She wasn't a national candidate.

No one has ever explained HOW they were able to pinpoint her videos. It's actually frightening and fascinating.

Not really. Everyone remembers if a neighbor, coworker, classmate, etc had a video out there. When she ran for office I'm sure someone remembered they had the video on an old drive and sent it out

The odds that a neighbor, coworker, or classmate saw one of her 15 videos is infinitesimal. Millions of videos produced daily on a global basis. Times 365 days per year. And it seems that the videos were only uploaded to a public site within a few months of the election (so likely uploaded by the Republican political consultant himself).

Honestly she probably bragged about it to someone and word got around. Everyone I know who is involved in some kind of kink can’t shut up about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still want to know the technical details about how the GOP found her live stream videos.

She made these long before she ever announced her candidacy. Millions of streamers make these videos EVERYDAY that are ostensibly streamed, but not archived.

Even if if there are websites that archive every adult stream (so millions of streams per day), you still need to match a handful of archived videos with a single person running in an obscure state-level legislative race. She wasn't a national candidate.

No one has ever explained HOW they were able to pinpoint her videos. It's actually frightening and fascinating.

Not really. Everyone remembers if a neighbor, coworker, classmate, etc had a video out there. When she ran for office I'm sure someone remembered they had the video on an old drive and sent it out

The odds that a neighbor, coworker, or classmate saw one of her 15 videos is infinitesimal. Millions of videos produced daily on a global basis. Times 365 days per year. And it seems that the videos were only uploaded to a public site within a few months of the election (so likely uploaded by the Republican political consultant himself).

Anonymous wrote:90% of millennials take nudes?! Really?