Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least some of them are retiring to get FCPS pensions while collecting a salary in a new division.
I get the impression Reid actually expects some results from principals and the ones who quit were used to Brabrand’s do-nothing style.
+1. I also get a strong sense from community meetings that Reid is out here pushing for real results - especially for the most disadvantaged and those lagging far behind the norm. I think some principals, specifically those closer to retirement, realize it's going to be hard work to fix the failing schools and jumping ship to a system with less expectations is an easy way out.
I agree with this. It's easy to keep swimming along with the stream, especially if you've been doing it long enough to be close to retirement. Do you really care at that point if the system works or if the stream is clean? Do you care if it is a downright toxic environment for a not-insignificant portion of students? Or do you just want to come in and punch a clock and not have to actually manage anyone or be in charge of fixing anything for the next couple of years?
My guess would be just to punch a clock. That's what I'd want to do, but then again, I don't work in a public environment where I'm expected and entrusted to be a guardian working in the best interest of minors. The system stinks, and when you are in charge of managing a stinky system, then you can't afford to just coast through. If you aren't up to right the ship, then the most responsible thing is to jump ship.
And we are. Nobody wants to work with a parent like you that’s going to try to guilt them into loving an almost impossible job.
NP. It’s hard to retain respect for school employees who come on here and whine incessantly about how “impossible” their jobs are.
You would find many other jobs make far greater demands and require greater sacrifices.
BS.
I don't know anyone besides my family who are teachers who uses their own funds to purchase food, coats and gloves, books, and supplies for their "clients." Maybe some social workers do as well, but I don't know of any who are.
The only other people I know who regularly give up one or both weekend days to do their job are attorneys.
I don't think there are many other professionals who deal with the vitriol spewed the way teachers do. Just reading this forum is a window into what they experience. It's disgusting at times.
Cry more.
I'm not crying. I am merely defending the truth, a truth your reply supports.
Anonymous wrote:^ +1 was for the survey/exit interview results.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least some of them are retiring to get FCPS pensions while collecting a salary in a new division.
I get the impression Reid actually expects some results from principals and the ones who quit were used to Brabrand’s do-nothing style.
+1. I also get a strong sense from community meetings that Reid is out here pushing for real results - especially for the most disadvantaged and those lagging far behind the norm. I think some principals, specifically those closer to retirement, realize it's going to be hard work to fix the failing schools and jumping ship to a system with less expectations is an easy way out.
I agree with this. It's easy to keep swimming along with the stream, especially if you've been doing it long enough to be close to retirement. Do you really care at that point if the system works or if the stream is clean? Do you care if it is a downright toxic environment for a not-insignificant portion of students? Or do you just want to come in and punch a clock and not have to actually manage anyone or be in charge of fixing anything for the next couple of years?
My guess would be just to punch a clock. That's what I'd want to do, but then again, I don't work in a public environment where I'm expected and entrusted to be a guardian working in the best interest of minors. The system stinks, and when you are in charge of managing a stinky system, then you can't afford to just coast through. If you aren't up to right the ship, then the most responsible thing is to jump ship.
And we are. Nobody wants to work with a parent like you that’s going to try to guilt them into loving an almost impossible job.
NP. It’s hard to retain respect for school employees who come on here and whine incessantly about how “impossible” their jobs are.
You would find many other jobs make far greater demands and require greater sacrifices.
BS.
I don't know anyone besides my family who are teachers who uses their own funds to purchase food, coats and gloves, books, and supplies for their "clients." Maybe some social workers do as well, but I don't know of any who are.
The only other people I know who regularly give up one or both weekend days to do their job are attorneys.
I don't think there are many other professionals who deal with the vitriol spewed the way teachers do. Just reading this forum is a window into what they experience. It's disgusting at times.
Cry more.
Not exactly a well thought out response.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least some of them are retiring to get FCPS pensions while collecting a salary in a new division.
I get the impression Reid actually expects some results from principals and the ones who quit were used to Brabrand’s do-nothing style.
+1. I also get a strong sense from community meetings that Reid is out here pushing for real results - especially for the most disadvantaged and those lagging far behind the norm. I think some principals, specifically those closer to retirement, realize it's going to be hard work to fix the failing schools and jumping ship to a system with less expectations is an easy way out.
I agree with this. It's easy to keep swimming along with the stream, especially if you've been doing it long enough to be close to retirement. Do you really care at that point if the system works or if the stream is clean? Do you care if it is a downright toxic environment for a not-insignificant portion of students? Or do you just want to come in and punch a clock and not have to actually manage anyone or be in charge of fixing anything for the next couple of years?
My guess would be just to punch a clock. That's what I'd want to do, but then again, I don't work in a public environment where I'm expected and entrusted to be a guardian working in the best interest of minors. The system stinks, and when you are in charge of managing a stinky system, then you can't afford to just coast through. If you aren't up to right the ship, then the most responsible thing is to jump ship.
And we are. Nobody wants to work with a parent like you that’s going to try to guilt them into loving an almost impossible job.
NP. It’s hard to retain respect for school employees who come on here and whine incessantly about how “impossible” their jobs are.
You would find many other jobs make far greater demands and require greater sacrifices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least some of them are retiring to get FCPS pensions while collecting a salary in a new division.
I get the impression Reid actually expects some results from principals and the ones who quit were used to Brabrand’s do-nothing style.
+1. I also get a strong sense from community meetings that Reid is out here pushing for real results - especially for the most disadvantaged and those lagging far behind the norm. I think some principals, specifically those closer to retirement, realize it's going to be hard work to fix the failing schools and jumping ship to a system with less expectations is an easy way out.
I agree with this. It's easy to keep swimming along with the stream, especially if you've been doing it long enough to be close to retirement. Do you really care at that point if the system works or if the stream is clean? Do you care if it is a downright toxic environment for a not-insignificant portion of students? Or do you just want to come in and punch a clock and not have to actually manage anyone or be in charge of fixing anything for the next couple of years?
My guess would be just to punch a clock. That's what I'd want to do, but then again, I don't work in a public environment where I'm expected and entrusted to be a guardian working in the best interest of minors. The system stinks, and when you are in charge of managing a stinky system, then you can't afford to just coast through. If you aren't up to right the ship, then the most responsible thing is to jump ship.
And we are. Nobody wants to work with a parent like you that’s going to try to guilt them into loving an almost impossible job.
NP. It’s hard to retain respect for school employees who come on here and whine incessantly about how “impossible” their jobs are.
You would find many other jobs make far greater demands and require greater sacrifices.
BS.
I don't know anyone besides my family who are teachers who uses their own funds to purchase food, coats and gloves, books, and supplies for their "clients." Maybe some social workers do as well, but I don't know of any who are.
The only other people I know who regularly give up one or both weekend days to do their job are attorneys.
I don't think there are many other professionals who deal with the vitriol spewed the way teachers do. Just reading this forum is a window into what they experience. It's disgusting at times.
Cry more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least some of them are retiring to get FCPS pensions while collecting a salary in a new division.
I get the impression Reid actually expects some results from principals and the ones who quit were used to Brabrand’s do-nothing style.
+1. I also get a strong sense from community meetings that Reid is out here pushing for real results - especially for the most disadvantaged and those lagging far behind the norm. I think some principals, specifically those closer to retirement, realize it's going to be hard work to fix the failing schools and jumping ship to a system with less expectations is an easy way out.
I agree with this. It's easy to keep swimming along with the stream, especially if you've been doing it long enough to be close to retirement. Do you really care at that point if the system works or if the stream is clean? Do you care if it is a downright toxic environment for a not-insignificant portion of students? Or do you just want to come in and punch a clock and not have to actually manage anyone or be in charge of fixing anything for the next couple of years?
My guess would be just to punch a clock. That's what I'd want to do, but then again, I don't work in a public environment where I'm expected and entrusted to be a guardian working in the best interest of minors. The system stinks, and when you are in charge of managing a stinky system, then you can't afford to just coast through. If you aren't up to right the ship, then the most responsible thing is to jump ship.
And we are. Nobody wants to work with a parent like you that’s going to try to guilt them into loving an almost impossible job.
NP. It’s hard to retain respect for school employees who come on here and whine incessantly about how “impossible” their jobs are.
You would find many other jobs make far greater demands and require greater sacrifices.
BS.
I don't know anyone besides my family who are teachers who uses their own funds to purchase food, coats and gloves, books, and supplies for their "clients." Maybe some social workers do as well, but I don't know of any who are.
The only other people I know who regularly give up one or both weekend days to do their job are attorneys.
I don't think there are many other professionals who deal with the vitriol spewed the way teachers do. Just reading this forum is a window into what they experience. It's disgusting at times.
Cry more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least some of them are retiring to get FCPS pensions while collecting a salary in a new division.
I get the impression Reid actually expects some results from principals and the ones who quit were used to Brabrand’s do-nothing style.
+1. I also get a strong sense from community meetings that Reid is out here pushing for real results - especially for the most disadvantaged and those lagging far behind the norm. I think some principals, specifically those closer to retirement, realize it's going to be hard work to fix the failing schools and jumping ship to a system with less expectations is an easy way out.
I agree with this. It's easy to keep swimming along with the stream, especially if you've been doing it long enough to be close to retirement. Do you really care at that point if the system works or if the stream is clean? Do you care if it is a downright toxic environment for a not-insignificant portion of students? Or do you just want to come in and punch a clock and not have to actually manage anyone or be in charge of fixing anything for the next couple of years?
My guess would be just to punch a clock. That's what I'd want to do, but then again, I don't work in a public environment where I'm expected and entrusted to be a guardian working in the best interest of minors. The system stinks, and when you are in charge of managing a stinky system, then you can't afford to just coast through. If you aren't up to right the ship, then the most responsible thing is to jump ship.
And we are. Nobody wants to work with a parent like you that’s going to try to guilt them into loving an almost impossible job.
NP. It’s hard to retain respect for school employees who come on here and whine incessantly about how “impossible” their jobs are.
You would find many other jobs make far greater demands and require greater sacrifices.
BS.
I don't know anyone besides my family who are teachers who uses their own funds to purchase food, coats and gloves, books, and supplies for their "clients." Maybe some social workers do as well, but I don't know of any who are.
The only other people I know who regularly give up one or both weekend days to do their job are attorneys.
I don't think there are many other professionals who deal with the vitriol spewed the way teachers do. Just reading this forum is a window into what they experience. It's disgusting at times.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least some of them are retiring to get FCPS pensions while collecting a salary in a new division.
I get the impression Reid actually expects some results from principals and the ones who quit were used to Brabrand’s do-nothing style.
+1. I also get a strong sense from community meetings that Reid is out here pushing for real results - especially for the most disadvantaged and those lagging far behind the norm. I think some principals, specifically those closer to retirement, realize it's going to be hard work to fix the failing schools and jumping ship to a system with less expectations is an easy way out.
I agree with this. It's easy to keep swimming along with the stream, especially if you've been doing it long enough to be close to retirement. Do you really care at that point if the system works or if the stream is clean? Do you care if it is a downright toxic environment for a not-insignificant portion of students? Or do you just want to come in and punch a clock and not have to actually manage anyone or be in charge of fixing anything for the next couple of years?
My guess would be just to punch a clock. That's what I'd want to do, but then again, I don't work in a public environment where I'm expected and entrusted to be a guardian working in the best interest of minors. The system stinks, and when you are in charge of managing a stinky system, then you can't afford to just coast through. If you aren't up to right the ship, then the most responsible thing is to jump ship.
And we are. Nobody wants to work with a parent like you that’s going to try to guilt them into loving an almost impossible job.
NP. It’s hard to retain respect for school employees who come on here and whine incessantly about how “impossible” their jobs are.
You would find many other jobs make far greater demands and require greater sacrifices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least some of them are retiring to get FCPS pensions while collecting a salary in a new division.
I get the impression Reid actually expects some results from principals and the ones who quit were used to Brabrand’s do-nothing style.
+1. I also get a strong sense from community meetings that Reid is out here pushing for real results - especially for the most disadvantaged and those lagging far behind the norm. I think some principals, specifically those closer to retirement, realize it's going to be hard work to fix the failing schools and jumping ship to a system with less expectations is an easy way out.
I agree with this. It's easy to keep swimming along with the stream, especially if you've been doing it long enough to be close to retirement. Do you really care at that point if the system works or if the stream is clean? Do you care if it is a downright toxic environment for a not-insignificant portion of students? Or do you just want to come in and punch a clock and not have to actually manage anyone or be in charge of fixing anything for the next couple of years?
My guess would be just to punch a clock. That's what I'd want to do, but then again, I don't work in a public environment where I'm expected and entrusted to be a guardian working in the best interest of minors. The system stinks, and when you are in charge of managing a stinky system, then you can't afford to just coast through. If you aren't up to right the ship, then the most responsible thing is to jump ship.
And we are. Nobody wants to work with a parent like you that’s going to try to guilt them into loving an almost impossible job.
NP. It’s hard to retain respect for school employees who come on here and whine incessantly about how “impossible” their jobs are.
You would find many other jobs make far greater demands and require greater sacrifices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least some of them are retiring to get FCPS pensions while collecting a salary in a new division.
I get the impression Reid actually expects some results from principals and the ones who quit were used to Brabrand’s do-nothing style.
+1. I also get a strong sense from community meetings that Reid is out here pushing for real results - especially for the most disadvantaged and those lagging far behind the norm. I think some principals, specifically those closer to retirement, realize it's going to be hard work to fix the failing schools and jumping ship to a system with less expectations is an easy way out.
I agree with this. It's easy to keep swimming along with the stream, especially if you've been doing it long enough to be close to retirement. Do you really care at that point if the system works or if the stream is clean? Do you care if it is a downright toxic environment for a not-insignificant portion of students? Or do you just want to come in and punch a clock and not have to actually manage anyone or be in charge of fixing anything for the next couple of years?
My guess would be just to punch a clock. That's what I'd want to do, but then again, I don't work in a public environment where I'm expected and entrusted to be a guardian working in the best interest of minors. The system stinks, and when you are in charge of managing a stinky system, then you can't afford to just coast through. If you aren't up to right the ship, then the most responsible thing is to jump ship.
And we are. Nobody wants to work with a parent like you that’s going to try to guilt them into loving an almost impossible job.
NP. It’s hard to retain respect for school employees who come on here and whine incessantly about how “impossible” their jobs are.
You would find many other jobs make far greater demands and require greater sacrifices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least some of them are retiring to get FCPS pensions while collecting a salary in a new division.
I get the impression Reid actually expects some results from principals and the ones who quit were used to Brabrand’s do-nothing style.
+1. I also get a strong sense from community meetings that Reid is out here pushing for real results - especially for the most disadvantaged and those lagging far behind the norm. I think some principals, specifically those closer to retirement, realize it's going to be hard work to fix the failing schools and jumping ship to a system with less expectations is an easy way out.
I agree with this. It's easy to keep swimming along with the stream, especially if you've been doing it long enough to be close to retirement. Do you really care at that point if the system works or if the stream is clean? Do you care if it is a downright toxic environment for a not-insignificant portion of students? Or do you just want to come in and punch a clock and not have to actually manage anyone or be in charge of fixing anything for the next couple of years?
My guess would be just to punch a clock. That's what I'd want to do, but then again, I don't work in a public environment where I'm expected and entrusted to be a guardian working in the best interest of minors. The system stinks, and when you are in charge of managing a stinky system, then you can't afford to just coast through. If you aren't up to right the ship, then the most responsible thing is to jump ship.
And we are. Nobody wants to work with a parent like you that’s going to try to guilt them into loving an almost impossible job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least some of them are retiring to get FCPS pensions while collecting a salary in a new division.
I get the impression Reid actually expects some results from principals and the ones who quit were used to Brabrand’s do-nothing style.
+1. I also get a strong sense from community meetings that Reid is out here pushing for real results - especially for the most disadvantaged and those lagging far behind the norm. I think some principals, specifically those closer to retirement, realize it's going to be hard work to fix the failing schools and jumping ship to a system with less expectations is an easy way out.
I agree with this. It's easy to keep swimming along with the stream, especially if you've been doing it long enough to be close to retirement. Do you really care at that point if the system works or if the stream is clean? Do you care if it is a downright toxic environment for a not-insignificant portion of students? Or do you just want to come in and punch a clock and not have to actually manage anyone or be in charge of fixing anything for the next couple of years?
My guess would be just to punch a clock. That's what I'd want to do, but then again, I don't work in a public environment where I'm expected and entrusted to be a guardian working in the best interest of minors. The system stinks, and when you are in charge of managing a stinky system, then you can't afford to just coast through. If you aren't up to right the ship, then the most responsible thing is to jump ship.
Anonymous wrote:I'd be curious to see the employee satisfaction surveys from the principals who recently left. I suspect a few of them were given the "retire or get fired" ultimatum.