Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's time.
It's time for every council member and bleeding heart pundit who runs around saying "but they are just kids, they don't know the consequences" to just shut up and sit down. And it's time to treat these serious, violent crimes like armed robbery and carjacking as the adult crimes they are, and to police them and prosecute them accordingly. And to hold those who fail to do so accountable, regardless of where they are in the chain, whether MPD or other LEOs, whether Council, the Mayor, the Prosecutors, the Courts, the detention and probation, ALL of them need to start being held accountable.
These kids committing those crimes DAMN WELL DO understand the consequences.
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/viral-video-dc-teens-discussing-difference-criminal-charges-armed-carjacking-robbery-murder
From what I can tell, it’s going to take a lot more to force these people to admit failure and lead DC out of this mess than current crime levels.
Today, Bowser declared an emergency regarding youth violence and apparently is looking to use emergency powers to bolster up on juvenile detention facilities to get these kids off the streets. She's also declared an emergency on opioids.
https://mayor.dc.gov/release/mayor-bowser-issues-public-emergency-give-district-new-tools-responding-opioid-crisis-and
Narrators voice: “In retrospect keeping the kids out of school for two years and convincing them they’re owed reparations was a bad idea.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, let’s be clear, these proposals are not intended to make a difference. They are intended to pretend that they are trying. In order to actually make a difference, DC political leaders will need to admit they were wrong and embrace the very pro-active policing strategies that they have eschewed, including aggressive use of Terry stops, undercover work/vice squads, and aggressive prosecution of even minor offenses.
It’s interesting how D.C.’s jump in murders began the same year that the city got rid of it’s vice squads. Also the first year that Bowser was mayor, for that matter:
https://www.washingtonian.com/2015/08/26/why-did-dc-shut-down-its-vice-squads-crime-rate-cathy-lanier/
Though, as is often the case, as bad as Bowser has been she’s still preferable to the Council as she at least sees crime as an issue. In 2016, both Bowser and Lanier were talking about D.C.’s broken system that let’s repeat offenders victimize people again and again:
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/is-dcs-criminal-justice-system-broken-mayor-bowser-agrees-with-chief-laniers-comments
Which is a reminder that even during the “good days,” crime was bad and the system was broken. But it was still tolerable to people. Though it seems that they tolerated it too much, and sheepishly sat by as extremist activists drove things into the ground. Now it seems like it would take years to even get back to the “bad but somewhat tolerable” levels.
Anonymous wrote:Send in the feds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC crimes are not prosecuted. They declined to prosecute 67% of local arrests. Philly was only 4% to give an example
DC is allowing crime to happen and not chosing to prosecute it they are eventually asking for it and voters are supporting it
This is it right here. I personally know 3 DC residents who were the victims of crime and none of their cases were prosecuted. They returned "no paper" on every single case.
1. Carjacking. Victim provided very good description of the guys who did it, including a pair of distinct shoes. The guys were caught in the stolen car nearby. The descriptions matched and the one guy was wearing the shoes. Prosecutor chose to no paper due to lack of evidence. This was in 2022.
2. Robbery. Surveillance footage of the robbery was provided to the police. No prosecution. What's even better in this case is that the victim went to the location where her belongings were recovered and spoke with the manager of the business about security footage. The manager would not send her the footage (said the police could get it, tho) but allowed her to use her cell phone to record the screen. The person who robbed her and the person who ditched the belongings are the same. The police never even asked about any security footage from either location. This was in 2023.
3. B&E. Ring footage and inside video footage provided to the police. No prosecution. This was in 2023.
Make it make sense, please.
The young people of DC know they can pretty much do what they want and get away with it.
But tHe sChOoL tO PrIsOn pIpElInE!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, let’s be clear, these proposals are not intended to make a difference. They are intended to pretend that they are trying. In order to actually make a difference, DC political leaders will need to admit they were wrong and embrace the very pro-active policing strategies that they have eschewed, including aggressive use of Terry stops, undercover work/vice squads, and aggressive prosecution of even minor offenses.
It’s interesting how D.C.’s jump in murders began the same year that the city got rid of it’s vice squads. Also the first year that Bowser was mayor, for that matter:
https://www.washingtonian.com/2015/08/26/why-did-dc-shut-down-its-vice-squads-crime-rate-cathy-lanier/
Though, as is often the case, as bad as Bowser has been she’s still preferable to the Council as she at least sees crime as an issue. In 2016, both Bowser and Lanier were talking about D.C.’s broken system that let’s repeat offenders victimize people again and again:
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/is-dcs-criminal-justice-system-broken-mayor-bowser-agrees-with-chief-laniers-comments
Which is a reminder that even during the “good days,” crime was bad and the system was broken. But it was still tolerable to people. Though it seems that they tolerated it too much, and sheepishly sat by as extremist activists drove things into the ground. Now it seems like it would take years to even get back to the “bad but somewhat tolerable” levels.
Anonymous wrote:Again, let’s be clear, these proposals are not intended to make a difference. They are intended to pretend that they are trying. In order to actually make a difference, DC political leaders will need to admit they were wrong and embrace the very pro-active policing strategies that they have eschewed, including aggressive use of Terry stops, undercover work/vice squads, and aggressive prosecution of even minor offenses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's time.
It's time for every council member and bleeding heart pundit who runs around saying "but they are just kids, they don't know the consequences" to just shut up and sit down. And it's time to treat these serious, violent crimes like armed robbery and carjacking as the adult crimes they are, and to police them and prosecute them accordingly. And to hold those who fail to do so accountable, regardless of where they are in the chain, whether MPD or other LEOs, whether Council, the Mayor, the Prosecutors, the Courts, the detention and probation, ALL of them need to start being held accountable.
These kids committing those crimes DAMN WELL DO understand the consequences.
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/viral-video-dc-teens-discussing-difference-criminal-charges-armed-carjacking-robbery-murder
From what I can tell, it’s going to take a lot more to force these people to admit failure and lead DC out of this mess than current crime levels.
Today, Bowser declared an emergency regarding youth violence and apparently is looking to use emergency powers to bolster up on juvenile detention facilities to get these kids off the streets. She's also declared an emergency on opioids.
https://mayor.dc.gov/release/mayor-bowser-issues-public-emergency-give-district-new-tools-responding-opioid-crisis-and
I wonder how folks are going to respond next year when it is announced that DC cannot afford bike lanes because it needs to build more juvenile detention facilities. That’s going to be interesting.
Moody's changed DC's credit rating outlook from stable to negative today. Doesn't seem as if we're gonna be able to afford either of those things.
Holy cow. This is a big deal and should be its own thread. It’s notable that they downgraded DC but not VA or MD.
I’m practical terms what this means for DC is that everything they want to do has just gotten more expensive to finance and as a result the wish list needs to get smaller or taxes need to get higher.
Cool. So let’s drop $10 million on bike lanes that 100 people want but 150 businesses owners say will ruin them.
There is absolutely no way that bike lanes will ruin 150 businesses. Knock it off with the hyperbole.