Anonymous
Post 10/02/2023 22:26     Subject: Re:Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
USCP basically confirmed Bowman's version of events today and no one noticed.

"On security video, a man was seen trying to exit the door in the Cannon Building and then pulling the fire alarm that prompted the evacuation. USCP officers had previously placed signs with clear language that explained the door was secured and marked as an emergency exit only."

So, he tried to exit, then pulled the alarm. And the signs were placed there (whether it's "clear language" is more subjective, but at worst he had a massive brain fart)

https://www.uscp.gov/media-center/press-releases/uscp-investigating-cannon-building-evacuation
Anonymous
Post 10/02/2023 21:15     Subject: Re:Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile over at the AUSA DC office...



LOL. He didn't obstruct anything, let alone "criminally".


Careful, you may be a part of a conspiracy.
Anonymous
Post 10/02/2023 21:06     Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Its over now that Congressman Bowman calls the Repubs 'Nazi's'


Good Lord. This cannot be real.



What a tremendous apology. Somewhere, Justin Trudeau is saying, whoa dude, rough day at the office?
Anonymous
Post 10/02/2023 21:05     Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:Call off the lawfar ñe on this apparent nothing burger. Take the high road and not the whataboutism road.


^ lawfare
Anonymous
Post 10/02/2023 21:05     Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Call off the lawfar ñe on this apparent nothing burger. Take the high road and not the whataboutism road.
Anonymous
Post 10/02/2023 17:59     Subject: Re:Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile over at the AUSA DC office...



LOL. He didn't obstruct anything, let alone "criminally".


Assume for a moment that’s the case. They could still get him on attempt.


omg guys, come on
Anonymous
Post 10/02/2023 17:39     Subject: Re:Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile over at the AUSA DC office...



LOL. He didn't obstruct anything, let alone "criminally".


Assume for a moment that’s the case. They could still get him on attempt.
jsteele
Post 10/02/2023 17:33     Subject: Re:Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile over at the AUSA DC office...



LOL. He didn't obstruct anything, let alone "criminally".
Anonymous
Post 10/02/2023 17:29     Subject: Re:Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Meanwhile over at the AUSA DC office...

Anonymous
Post 10/02/2023 17:11     Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Were our resident MAGAs this concerned about the Jan 6 rioters?
Anonymous
Post 10/02/2023 17:10     Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:Their defense of bowman involved talking points calling republicans Nazis. Bowman now apologizing https://x.com/repbowman/status/1708925626407674238?s=46&t=Rw_jX1uyupQwvEwsjuQulQ


Why am I not surprised? Not one bit.
Anonymous
Post 10/02/2023 16:45     Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Its over now that Congressman Bowman calls the Repubs 'Nazi's'


Good Lord. This cannot be real.



Anonymous
Post 10/02/2023 16:42     Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Anonymous wrote:Its over now that Congressman Bowman calls the Repubs 'Nazi's'


Good Lord. This cannot be real.

Anonymous
Post 10/02/2023 16:34     Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
It’s such a terrible blunder, it’s reasonable to ask if he needs to be drug tested.
Anonymous
Post 10/02/2023 16:03     Subject: Defending Bowman in fire alarm incident
Their defense of bowman involved talking points calling republicans Nazis. Bowman now apologizing https://x.com/repbowman/status/1708925626407674238?s=46&t=Rw_jX1uyupQwvEwsjuQulQ