Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I miss the memo. Why this is changing for John federman..... does he have a physical disability that makes him unable to wear pants?

In his defense, it's not that easy or affordable to shop for dress suits when you're 6'8 and built like Shrek. And unlike most of his other Senate counterparts he's not a multimillionaire who can afford closets full of custom tailored famous label suits.

Oh cry me a river. Dude now makes almost $180,000 or whatever. He can afford 2-3 suit jackets, some pants, and some shirts.

But that's not how he dresses. It's not how he dressed on the campaign trail, when the people of Pennsylvania voted him into office, either. This isn't some bait and switch - this is who he is.

I don't give a crap how he dressed on the campaign trail. He wasn't an elected official with a JOB on Capitol Hill representing the country. You cannot do whatever you feel like at your job. There are standards for conduct and personal appearance. The fact that Schumer is lowering the standards for clowns like Fettermans is absolutely pathetic.

You think Fettermans is the first progressive and champion of the working class man ever elected into office? Oh please. Bernie wears suits. Even super progressives and white knights for the middle class like Estes Kefauver went to work in a suit and not jeans and a flannel shirt.

This is a pathetic decline in the standards for civility and personal conduct in the United States.

I guess Fetterman and Bernie are different people even if they share some values. Weird!

This seems a weird place to hang your hat on the decline of civility and personal conduct. See you on the Rep. Boobsallout thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I miss the memo. Why this is changing for John federman..... does he have a physical disability that makes him unable to wear pants?

In his defense, it's not that easy or affordable to shop for dress suits when you're 6'8 and built like Shrek. And unlike most of his other Senate counterparts he's not a multimillionaire who can afford closets full of custom tailored famous label suits.

Oh cry me a river. Dude now makes almost $180,000 or whatever. He can afford 2-3 suit jackets, some pants, and some shirts.

But that's not how he dresses. It's not how he dressed on the campaign trail, when the people of Pennsylvania voted him into office, either. This isn't some bait and switch - this is who he is.

I don't give a crap how he dressed on the campaign trail. He wasn't an elected official with a JOB on Capitol Hill representing the country. You cannot do whatever you feel like at your job. There are standards for conduct and personal appearance. The fact that Schumer is lowering the standards for clowns like Fettermans is absolutely pathetic.

You think Fettermans is the first progressive and champion of the working class man ever elected into office? Oh please. Bernie wears suits. Even super progressives and white knights for the middle class like Estes Kefauver went to work in a suit and not jeans and a flannel shirt.

This is a pathetic decline in the standards for civility and personal conduct in the United States.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I sincerely hope anyone criticizing this policy in this thread is lambasting Boebert's actions in that other thread.

❗️

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I miss the memo. Why this is changing for John federman..... does he have a physical disability that makes him unable to wear pants?

In his defense, it's not that easy or affordable to shop for dress suits when you're 6'8 and built like Shrek. And unlike most of his other Senate counterparts he's not a multimillionaire who can afford closets full of custom tailored famous label suits.

Oh cry me a river. Dude now makes almost $180,000 or whatever. He can afford 2-3 suit jackets, some pants, and some shirts.

But that's not how he dresses. It's not how he dressed on the campaign trail, when the people of Pennsylvania voted him into office, either. This isn't some bait and switch - this is who he is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I miss the memo. Why this is changing for John federman..... does he have a physical disability that makes him unable to wear pants?

In his defense, it's not that easy or affordable to shop for dress suits when you're 6'8 and built like Shrek. And unlike most of his other Senate counterparts he's not a multimillionaire who can afford closets full of custom tailored famous label suits.

Oh cry me a river. Dude now makes almost $180,000 or whatever. He can afford 2-3 suit jackets, some pants, and some shirts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I miss the memo. Why this is changing for John federman..... does he have a physical disability that makes him unable to wear pants?

In his defense, it's not that easy or affordable to shop for dress suits when you're 6'8 and built like Shrek. And unlike most of his other Senate counterparts he's not a multimillionaire who can afford closets full of custom tailored famous label suits.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I miss the memo. Why this is changing for John federman..... does he have a physical disability that makes him unable to wear pants?

In his defense, it's not that easy or affordable to shop for dress suits when you're 6'8 and built like Shrek. And unlike most of his other Senate counterparts he's not a multimillionaire who can afford closets full of custom tailored famous label suits.

Yet, the staffers are expected to do just that.

Yep - just like staffers aren't allowed to shout at the members, while the members can shout at the staffers, the rules are different when you work for someone, or when you're the one people work for. Are you suddenly feeling very pro-labor? Let's talk about unions now, if so!

Let's discuss WHY the staffers and everyone else are required to follow the dress code but Senators are not.
Are Senators THAT special that they are exempted while literally everyone else is expected to follow the rules?

Anonymous wrote:I sincerely hope anyone criticizing this policy in this thread is lambasting Boebert's actions in that other thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I miss the memo. Why this is changing for John federman..... does he have a physical disability that makes him unable to wear pants?

In his defense, it's not that easy or affordable to shop for dress suits when you're 6'8 and built like Shrek. And unlike most of his other Senate counterparts he's not a multimillionaire who can afford closets full of custom tailored famous label suits.

Yet, the staffers are expected to do just that.

Yep - just like staffers aren't allowed to shout at the members, while the members can shout at the staffers, the rules are different when you work for someone, or when you're the one people work for. Are you suddenly feeling very pro-labor? Let's talk about unions now, if so!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I miss the memo. Why this is changing for John federman..... does he have a physical disability that makes him unable to wear pants?

In his defense, it's not that easy or affordable to shop for dress suits when you're 6'8 and built like Shrek. And unlike most of his other Senate counterparts he's not a multimillionaire who can afford closets full of custom tailored famous label suits.

Yet, the staffers are expected to do just that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG 😆

That's Ivory Tower Elitism! Why am I not surprised ? Desantis attended Harvard and Yale, and obviously they indoctrinated him. I'm glad Joe the Plumber is not alive to see this.

LOL like Ron's someone to talk about how people dress

^^^^ Here we have someone who doesn't understand the difference between dressing for dealing with the effects of a hurricane's aftermath and working in the Senate chambers.
You are ignorant, pp.

No YOU are the ignorant dope. He was NOT there to "deal with hurricane aftermath" - he was there to show up for a press conference and that's it. It's not even remotely as though he was there to wade through the water to rescue victims and remove debris. He did none of that. He stayed on dry ground.

I’m not sure what the obsession over Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ white rubber boots says about our culture. But it says something.

And I don’t think it’s good.

It has been only a week since Hurricane Ian slammed into the Florida coast, and more than 100 people have died. Thousands more are without power or have lost everything.

The storm's aftermath remains a serious emergency, and it’s one DeSantis seems to be handling as a strong leader. He’s working hard to help communities get back to some semblance of normal, and he has even welcomed help from President Joe Biden, whom he’s sparred with in recent months. Ideological and partisan differences are getting put aside for the greater good of the people of Florida.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I miss the memo. Why this is changing for John federman..... does he have a physical disability that makes him unable to wear pants?

In his defense, it's not that easy or affordable to shop for dress suits when you're 6'8 and built like Shrek. And unlike most of his other Senate counterparts he's not a multimillionaire who can afford closets full of custom tailored famous label suits.

Anonymous wrote:I miss the memo. Why this is changing for John federman..... does he have a physical disability that makes him unable to wear pants?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG 😆

That's Ivory Tower Elitism! Why am I not surprised ? Desantis attended Harvard and Yale, and obviously they indoctrinated him. I'm glad Joe the Plumber is not alive to see this.

LOL like Ron's someone to talk about how people dress

^^^^ Here we have someone who doesn't understand the difference between dressing for dealing with the effects of a hurricane's aftermath and working in the Senate chambers.
You are ignorant, pp.