Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is ABSOLUTELY none of your business. But sure insert your opinions. I’m sure that will do wonders for the family relationship. Butt the F out.
Let me add that your idea of "no-name" means nothing. Perhaps you haven't heard of Colby? Bates? Swarthmore?
Those you rattled off are not no-name, obviously. I am referring to truly obscure regional liberal arts colleges. Colleges that may not exist in 10 years.
Please name a few of the schools. Serious question as some no-name small schools are interesting & worthwhile for various reasons.
Franklin, Wittenberg, Roon, Providence
Laughing hysterically at Providence being a no-name school.
Anonymous wrote:First of all, this is none of your business. ANd I don't say that often here.
Second of all, you clearly know nothing about the recruiting process. So let me enlighten you a bit. You might not think your niece is good at her sport, but that does not mean that these "no name" college coaches agree. (ALso, you're a snobby b1tch, but that's another matter). Many of the D3 schools give very good financial aid and merit aid, which your niece might qualify for.
Last, but not least, a lot of your idea of "no name" colleges are not that, and have good nursing programs.
So basically, butt out and educate yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is ABSOLUTELY none of your business. But sure insert your opinions. I’m sure that will do wonders for the family relationship. Butt the F out.
Let me add that your idea of "no-name" means nothing. Perhaps you haven't heard of Colby? Bates? Swarthmore?
Those you rattled off are not no-name, obviously. I am referring to truly obscure regional liberal arts colleges. Colleges that may not exist in 10 years.
Please name a few of the schools. Serious question as some no-name small schools are interesting & worthwhile for various reasons.
Franklin, Wittenberg, Roon, Providence
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is ABSOLUTELY none of your business. But sure insert your opinions. I’m sure that will do wonders for the family relationship. Butt the F out.
Let me add that your idea of "no-name" means nothing. Perhaps you haven't heard of Colby? Bates? Swarthmore?
Those you rattled off are not no-name, obviously. I am referring to truly obscure regional liberal arts colleges. Colleges that may not exist in 10 years.
Please name a few of the schools. Serious question as some no-name small schools are interesting & worthwhile for various reasons.
Franklin, Wittenberg, Roon, Providence
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So my niece can continue to play her sport in college. The issue is two-fold. Her daughter is simply good not great at her sport (which her parents refuse to accept) and the family is only middle class. They have no college savings, so debt will fuel this. Is it sports obsessed parents’ egos that refuse to let it go? They can’t admit ten years of sports efforts simply conclude in 12th grade?
Is there any way to convince them they’re about to make a terrible financial decision? The family is going to end up with a lot of debt, their daughter will likely quit the sport once she can do what she wants, and likely, the daughter hates the no-name private college where she knows nobody. Isn’t that how this usually plays out?
You have described - exactly - my daughter's best friend. Her parents are deeply in dept sending her to a private school so she can continue playing her sport. It really boggles the mind.
There are probably other reasons the kid goes to private school but lots of kids do way better in one environment than another (public v private).
I have come to appreciate sports. I come from a total non-sports family. My parents aren't from the U.S. and only had daughters - and daughters, back then, in the home country, did not do sports. I had three kids and two played several varsity sports in high school and one played in college. There is a lot of discipline and camraderie and support on a sports team. Sometimes, what matters in life and in education is for a kid to find their tribe, and sports can be their tribe.
If they're not fantastic at their sport and not fantastic at academics, a small, regional college may be the perfect answer. I have seen plenty of people go on to have succesful lives and find their niche after graduating from smaller, regional colleges.
PP here. Sure, all of this is true. But when parents can’t *afford* that small, regional private school (that is giving no merit aid), going into debt to send their kid there is doing no one any favors.
And before the usual suspects pipe up - of course I haven’t said anything at all to these parents. They’re good friends of ours and in fact, THEY are the ones who have brought up this subject several times. We just try to stay neutral - but of course we can discuss on an anonymous message board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is ABSOLUTELY none of your business. But sure insert your opinions. I’m sure that will do wonders for the family relationship. Butt the F out.
Let me add that your idea of "no-name" means nothing. Perhaps you haven't heard of Colby? Bates? Swarthmore?
Those you rattled off are not no-name, obviously. I am referring to truly obscure regional liberal arts colleges. Colleges that may not exist in 10 years.
Please name a few of the schools. Serious question as some no-name small schools are interesting & worthwhile for various reasons.
Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, this isn’t all that unusual. As you say, this scenario is doomed, but the dream for some dies hard. Even if the kid gets a scholarship, she’s spending four years “earning” a worthless degree from a no-name school. What’s the value of that “education”? Near zero. But, people make dumb decisions everyday; it’s just that some are more consequential than others.