Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The constitution protects agains cruel and unusual punishment…
That’s not cruel and unusual to me. Seems entirely appropriate.
Because unlike them, we are civilized and don't solve problems with violence.
Or take/do whatever we want.
Of course we solve problems with violence. THis is America. We currently castrate as a punishment. We kill people as a punishment. We inflict war as a punishment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I personally think pap smears are torture and were invented by a male, there is also female genital mutilation, so castrating rapists seems logical and equivalent. If we regulated men's testosterone as much as we regulate women's hormones there might not be as many rapists, school shootings or wars.
PAP was invented to save lives and has done so millions and millions of times since the technique was invented by a likely misogynist Greek immigrant physician. Although it may seem barbaric I don’t see another way, how would you propose getting a sample of cervical tissue to check for various diseases?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Castration isn’t going to stop someone from raping, if it’s what you’re asking.
Castration is a punishment for raping.
Let me spell it out for you: not having a penis or having a numb one isn’t going to stop someone from raping. Unless you cut off the rapist’s hands, mouth & feet, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Castration isn’t going to stop someone from raping, if it’s what you’re asking.
Castration is a punishment for raping.
Let me spell it out for you: not having a penis or having a numb one isn’t going to stop someone from raping. Unless you cut off the rapist’s hands, mouth & feet, too.
Finally, someone who gets it! I'm fine with cutting other limbs/appendages in addition to the castration. Let's add neck to that list while we're at it too. Find us someone to sponsor this bill!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Castration isn’t going to stop someone from raping, if it’s what you’re asking.
Castration is a punishment for raping.
Let me spell it out for you: not having a penis or having a numb one isn’t going to stop someone from raping. Unless you cut off the rapist’s hands, mouth & feet, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Castration isn’t going to stop someone from raping, if it’s what you’re asking.
Castration is a punishment for raping.
Let me spell it out for you: not having a penis or having a numb one isn’t going to stop someone from raping. Unless you cut off the rapist’s hands, mouth & feet, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, so don’t castrate but allow the victim to release her anger on the perp.
How do you feel about the Iranian and Saudi practice of amputating a thief’s hand?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Castration wouldn’t end rape. It might prevent some forms, certainly not all.
Then many penis’s will be removed.
Not sure you have a firm understanding of biology.
What do you mean? A penis can’t be removed?
And also seems to not be unable to understand a logical argument.
If you don't need a penis for rape, removing a penis won't always stop it. What's your plan for second offenses?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because--at least in theory--our system allows for perpetrators of crimes to be deprived of freedom and time but not of body parts and human capacities.
The death penalty is an unusual outlier--you could see it as a deprivation of all human capacities (thus as a violation of the Constitutional concept of cruel and unusual punishment, which is prohibited), or you could look at it as someone having time and freedom removed in a finite way (and thus as consistent with the Constitution, and therefore allowed).
But the extent to which it is an outlier is also part of why it's been so hotly contested, even in the lifetimes of most of us posting here.
If you're jazzed up by the idea of cutting off limbs or removing organs as punishment for crimes as determined in a court system as deeply flawed as the one we are living with today, you're kind of a pervert yourself. I wouldn't be running around bragging about that, which is probably why you're doing it here as an anon.
Funny how a victim's rage is shamed and pathologized, while the real "pervert" behavior gets protected. Not the PP you're replying to but I honestly find you disgusting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because rape isn’t about sex, it’s about power and violence.
Penises aren't about sex either, they're about urination. And if used sexually with the intent to rape, they're not about sex, they're about power and violence. F*** off with your gaslighting.