Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wanted him charged as an adult, which isn’t unusual for vehicular homicide defendants two months shy of 18. Parisa refused, and now the wealthy spoiled killer will be a free man when he’s 19 and eventually have the conviction expunged from his record.
Thank you. Has Josh said publicly anywhere that he would have charged the criminal as an adult?
Actually, the opposite. He is on record saying he would have done the same thing.
But unlike the occupant, Josh would have WON that three-year sentence. Why? Because the judge LIKES Josh.
This is a really bizarre claim on which to hinge a campaign. One of the most outlandish things I have read in a while.
It’s not bizarre. Parisa has an off-putting personality - rigid, strident, comes across as condescending etc. People outside the courthouse weren’t aware of it until the Kehoe/Meade family spoke out. I think that’s at the root of the ad - Parisa didn’t listen, didn’t convey that she cared about the loss of Braylon, and then didn’t even bother to show up for sentencing. Josh has a much stronger reputation among his peers and judges and that matters to me.
How did this supposed off-putting personality affect the sentencing if Parisa wasn't at the sentencing?
You clearly don't understand. If only Parisa was less rigid, less strident, and more sympathetic, she'd have swayed a judge into deviating from the usual policy for accidents involving minors and punishing another juvenile far more harshly. Or maybe the judge would have stepped aside entirely and left it up to Rose Kehoe to impose the sentence. Isn't that obvious?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wanted him charged as an adult, which isn’t unusual for vehicular homicide defendants two months shy of 18. Parisa refused, and now the wealthy spoiled killer will be a free man when he’s 19 and eventually have the conviction expunged from his record.
Thank you. Has Josh said publicly anywhere that he would have charged the criminal as an adult?
Actually, the opposite. He is on record saying he would have done the same thing.
But unlike the occupant, Josh would have WON that three-year sentence. Why? Because the judge LIKES Josh.
This is a really bizarre claim on which to hinge a campaign. One of the most outlandish things I have read in a while.
It’s not bizarre. Parisa has an off-putting personality - rigid, strident, comes across as condescending etc. People outside the courthouse weren’t aware of it until the Kehoe/Meade family spoke out. I think that’s at the root of the ad - Parisa didn’t listen, didn’t convey that she cared about the loss of Braylon, and then didn’t even bother to show up for sentencing. Josh has a much stronger reputation among his peers and judges and that matters to me.
How did this supposed off-putting personality affect the sentencing if Parisa wasn't at the sentencing?
You clearly don't understand. If only Parisa was less rigid, less strident, and more sympathetic, she'd have swayed a judge into deviating from the usual policy for accidents involving minors and punishing another juvenile far more harshly. Or maybe the judge would have stepped aside entirely and left it up to Rose Kehoe to impose the sentence. Isn't that obvious?
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wanted him charged as an adult, which isn’t unusual for vehicular homicide defendants two months shy of 18. Parisa refused, and now the wealthy spoiled killer will be a free man when he’s 19 and eventually have the conviction expunged from his record.
Thank you. Has Josh said publicly anywhere that he would have charged the criminal as an adult?
Actually, the opposite. He is on record saying he would have done the same thing.
But unlike the occupant, Josh would have WON that three-year sentence. Why? Because the judge LIKES Josh.
This is a really bizarre claim on which to hinge a campaign. One of the most outlandish things I have read in a while.
It’s not bizarre. Parisa has an off-putting personality - rigid, strident, comes across as condescending etc. People outside the courthouse weren’t aware of it until the Kehoe/Meade family spoke out. I think that’s at the root of the ad - Parisa didn’t listen, didn’t convey that she cared about the loss of Braylon, and then didn’t even bother to show up for sentencing. Josh has a much stronger reputation among his peers and judges and that matters to me.
How did this supposed off-putting personality affect the sentencing if Parisa wasn't at the sentencing?
You clearly don't understand. If only Parisa was less rigid, less strident, and more sympathetic, she'd have swayed a judge into deviating from the usual policy for accidents involving minors and punishing another juvenile far more harshly. Or maybe the judge would have stepped aside entirely and left it up to Rose Kehoe to impose the sentence. Isn't that obvious?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wanted him charged as an adult, which isn’t unusual for vehicular homicide defendants two months shy of 18. Parisa refused, and now the wealthy spoiled killer will be a free man when he’s 19 and eventually have the conviction expunged from his record.
Thank you. Has Josh said publicly anywhere that he would have charged the criminal as an adult?
Actually, the opposite. He is on record saying he would have done the same thing.
But unlike the occupant, Josh would have WON that three-year sentence. Why? Because the judge LIKES Josh.
This is a really bizarre claim on which to hinge a campaign. One of the most outlandish things I have read in a while.
It’s not bizarre. Parisa has an off-putting personality - rigid, strident, comes across as condescending etc. People outside the courthouse weren’t aware of it until the Kehoe/Meade family spoke out. I think that’s at the root of the ad - Parisa didn’t listen, didn’t convey that she cared about the loss of Braylon, and then didn’t even bother to show up for sentencing. Josh has a much stronger reputation among his peers and judges and that matters to me.
How did this supposed off-putting personality affect the sentencing if Parisa wasn't at the sentencing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This ad isn’t nearly as bad as the phone call from John Legend asking me to vote for Parisa.
Let’s be real. There are highly progressive forces outside of our community trying to sway our local election. Parisa is a pawn in support of the soft on crime ideology. At least Katcher is a native Northern Virginian who has worked in Arlington/Falls Church for over a decade. He shows concern for a community member who lost a child instead of just drumming up celebrity support. Parisa clearly cares more about a national political agenda than actually focusing on our community, particularly crime victims. Would you really want some “innocence protector” in office if someone commits a crime against you? My friends in DC gripe to me about all the juveniles who keep getting let out after car jackings and muggings. I hope we don’t wind up with that crap here in Arlington.
Sorry but I care 1000% more about my family and neighbor’s safety than I do about the feelings of violent criminals. This shouldn’t even be debatable.
Josh’s supporters sound more than a little Trumpy lately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wanted him charged as an adult, which isn’t unusual for vehicular homicide defendants two months shy of 18. Parisa refused, and now the wealthy spoiled killer will be a free man when he’s 19 and eventually have the conviction expunged from his record.
Thank you. Has Josh said publicly anywhere that he would have charged the criminal as an adult?
Actually, the opposite. He is on record saying he would have done the same thing.
But unlike the occupant, Josh would have WON that three-year sentence. Why? Because the judge LIKES Josh.
This is a really bizarre claim on which to hinge a campaign. One of the most outlandish things I have read in a while.
It’s not bizarre. Parisa has an off-putting personality - rigid, strident, comes across as condescending etc. People outside the courthouse weren’t aware of it until the Kehoe/Meade family spoke out. I think that’s at the root of the ad - Parisa didn’t listen, didn’t convey that she cared about the loss of Braylon, and then didn’t even bother to show up for sentencing. Josh has a much stronger reputation among his peers and judges and that matters to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wanted him charged as an adult, which isn’t unusual for vehicular homicide defendants two months shy of 18. Parisa refused, and now the wealthy spoiled killer will be a free man when he’s 19 and eventually have the conviction expunged from his record.
Thank you. Has Josh said publicly anywhere that he would have charged the criminal as an adult?
Actually, the opposite. He is on record saying he would have done the same thing.
But unlike the occupant, Josh would have WON that three-year sentence. Why? Because the judge LIKES Josh.
This is a really bizarre claim on which to hinge a campaign. One of the most outlandish things I have read in a while.
It’s not bizarre. Parisa has an off-putting personality - rigid, strident, comes across as condescending etc. People outside the courthouse weren’t aware of it until the Kehoe/Meade family spoke out. I think that’s at the root of the ad - Parisa didn’t listen, didn’t convey that she cared about the loss of Braylon, and then didn’t even bother to show up for sentencing. Josh has a much stronger reputation among his peers and judges and that matters to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wanted him charged as an adult, which isn’t unusual for vehicular homicide defendants two months shy of 18. Parisa refused, and now the wealthy spoiled killer will be a free man when he’s 19 and eventually have the conviction expunged from his record.
Thank you. Has Josh said publicly anywhere that he would have charged the criminal as an adult?
Actually, the opposite. He is on record saying he would have done the same thing.
But unlike the occupant, Josh would have WON that three-year sentence. Why? Because the judge LIKES Josh.
This is a really bizarre claim on which to hinge a campaign. One of the most outlandish things I have read in a while.
It’s not bizarre. Parisa has an off-putting personality - rigid, strident, comes across as condescending etc. People outside the courthouse weren’t aware of it until the Kehoe/Meade family spoke out. I think that’s at the root of the ad - Parisa didn’t listen, didn’t convey that she cared about the loss of Braylon, and then didn’t even bother to show up for sentencing. Josh has a much stronger reputation among his peers and judges and that matters to me.
I'm very sorry for the loss of the Meade family, but there was a months-long outpouring of sympathy and support for that family from many corners. The suggestion that they somehow felt abandoned borders on the offensive when you consider how much attention this terrible incident and the family's loss received compared to the families of other victims.
Anonymous wrote:I'm very sorry for the loss of the Meade family, but there was a months-long outpouring of sympathy and support for that family from many corners. The suggestion that they somehow felt abandoned borders on the offensive when you consider how much attention this terrible incident and the family's loss received compared to the families of other victims.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wanted him charged as an adult, which isn’t unusual for vehicular homicide defendants two months shy of 18. Parisa refused, and now the wealthy spoiled killer will be a free man when he’s 19 and eventually have the conviction expunged from his record.
Thank you. Has Josh said publicly anywhere that he would have charged the criminal as an adult?
Actually, the opposite. He is on record saying he would have done the same thing.
But unlike the occupant, Josh would have WON that three-year sentence. Why? Because the judge LIKES Josh.
This is a really bizarre claim on which to hinge a campaign. One of the most outlandish things I have read in a while.
It’s not bizarre. Parisa has an off-putting personality - rigid, strident, comes across as condescending etc. People outside the courthouse weren’t aware of it until the Kehoe/Meade family spoke out. I think that’s at the root of the ad - Parisa didn’t listen, didn’t convey that she cared about the loss of Braylon, and then didn’t even bother to show up for sentencing. Josh has a much stronger reputation among his peers and judges and that matters to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wanted him charged as an adult, which isn’t unusual for vehicular homicide defendants two months shy of 18. Parisa refused, and now the wealthy spoiled killer will be a free man when he’s 19 and eventually have the conviction expunged from his record.
Thank you. Has Josh said publicly anywhere that he would have charged the criminal as an adult?
Actually, the opposite. He is on record saying he would have done the same thing.
But unlike the occupant, Josh would have WON that three-year sentence. Why? Because the judge LIKES Josh.
This is a really bizarre claim on which to hinge a campaign. One of the most outlandish things I have read in a while.
It’s not bizarre. Parisa has an off-putting personality - rigid, strident, comes across as condescending etc. People outside the courthouse weren’t aware of it until the Kehoe/Meade family spoke out. I think that’s at the root of the ad - Parisa didn’t listen, didn’t convey that she cared about the loss of Braylon, and then didn’t even bother to show up for sentencing. Josh has a much stronger reputation among his peers and judges and that matters to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wanted him charged as an adult, which isn’t unusual for vehicular homicide defendants two months shy of 18. Parisa refused, and now the wealthy spoiled killer will be a free man when he’s 19 and eventually have the conviction expunged from his record.
Thank you. Has Josh said publicly anywhere that he would have charged the criminal as an adult?
Actually, the opposite. He is on record saying he would have done the same thing.
But unlike the occupant, Josh would have WON that three-year sentence. Why? Because the judge LIKES Josh.
This is a really bizarre claim on which to hinge a campaign. One of the most outlandish things I have read in a while.