Anonymous wrote:UW in Seattle suburbs is a very good state flagship, but not appreciated on the East Coast.
Really, the only flagships worth a damn are UCLA, Berkeley, UM, UVA, and maybe UT Austin.
Anonymous wrote:UW in Seattle suburbs is a very good state flagship, but not appreciated on the East Coast.
Really, the only flagships worth a damn are UCLA, Berkeley, UM, UVA, and maybe UT Austin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this is because private universities were established in New England before public universities really got going, so those in blue states had to compete with prestigious incumbents whereas those elsewhere did not.
Or maybe those states don't care about higher education as much as Florida or Georgia or Texas. Have any NE states even attempted to set up R1 universities?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wasn't aware that FL was a flagship. University of Washington is much more selective and prestigious.
You weren't aware that a school called the "University of Florida" was a flagship of Florida...?
Let me rephrase: I was not aware that it was a “top” flagship. Seems much less prestigious/competitive in relation to the UCs, UVA, UIUC, UT Austin, UofM, Wisconsin at Madison and University of Washington.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wasn't aware that FL was a flagship. University of Washington is much more selective and prestigious.
You weren't aware that a school called the "University of Florida" was a flagship of Florida...?
Let me rephrase: I was not aware that it was a “top” flagship. Seems much less prestigious/competitive in relation to the UCs, UVA, UIUC, UT Austin, UofM, Wisconsin at Madison and University of Washington.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wasn't aware that FL was a flagship. University of Washington is much more selective and prestigious.
You weren't aware that a school called the "University of Florida" was a flagship of Florida...?
Let me rephrase: I was not aware that it was a “top” flagship. Seems much less prestigious/competitive in relation to the UCs, UVA, UIUC, UT Austin, UofM, Wisconsin at Madison and University of Washington.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wasn't aware that FL was a flagship. University of Washington is much more selective and prestigious.
You weren't aware that a school called the "University of Florida" was a flagship of Florida...?
Anonymous wrote:I wasn't aware that FL was a flagship. University of Washington is much more selective and prestigious.
Anonymous wrote:Most are purple leaning/trending blue, except for FL and TX, which are both huge (and neither of which has a flagship in the top 25).
Only CA, MI, and VA have flagships regularly in the top 25. MI is currently solidly blue (gov, senators, and both houses of state legislature are Dem); VA will trend back toward solidly blue because of abortion. And CA is of course the bluest blue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very interesting
See: WI, NC, GA, FL, TX, VA, MI
Then Gov Walker and the GOP gutted Wisconsin. Evers has done a great job of restoring funding.
Texas is losing good applicants for professors and current professors over the tenure fights: https://www.texastribune.org/2023/04/20/texas-senate-tenure-universities/
DiSantis is gutting Florida public education, particularly at the college level.
Michigan is solidly blue now.
Virginia is basically a blue state that had a charleton win on lies for Governor.
UNC is a abberation and I wouldn't consider GA to be in the same class as the CA, MI and other schools.