Why are only the Republican justices accepting these expensive trips from billionaires?
I haven't seen any stories saying that Ruth Bader Ginsberg accepted lavish vacations and private school tuition for her grandkids. In fact, I haven't seen any stories about any Democrats on the SCOTUS being hosted by generous billionaires.
Hmm.... Wonder why that is....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know!! Let’s impeach all but the democrats and fill the entire SC with democrats because that’s the goal here. I don’t think y’all know how transparent and gullible you all are.

+1
Thank you for cutting to the chase. That's the only thing that would make these dopes happy - full control of the SC.

You have got to be kidding? Oh, the irony.

This was the plan, I guess. Here goes another branch of government. Systematically undermining the people's confidence in the entire system until it crumbles under the weight of chaos.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Party's over - and who cares, they have lifetime appointments and zero accountability. I know their egos want people to like them, but exactly none of their job security depends on it. Their rulings are still law of the land even if we have the rulings and think (some of) the people making those laws are corrupt as heck.

No one in a position of power will be giving it up willingly for something as high minded as the greater good. They’re pigs at a trough. They’re going no where.

Anonymous wrote:

Alito is such a whiner. Leo comment about ProPublica was insane. Conservatives are ridiculous. They want moral purity from liberals but they can be as dirty as they want because they magically better people. Astounding truly.

Anonymous wrote:

Party's over - and who cares, they have lifetime appointments and zero accountability. I know their egos want people to like them, but exactly none of their job security depends on it. Their rulings are still law of the land even if we have the rulings and think (some of) the people making those laws are corrupt as heck.

Anonymous wrote:Judges need to be subject to the same ethics requirements as every other federal employee.

It’s ridiculous that a GS9 admin is subject to more stringent ethics requirements than a Supreme Court justice.

It really is. They hammer the ethics into us cogs and the GOP justices are allowed to do whatever the hell they want, even if it would get us fired and possibly prosecuted. They’re clearly not handling their access well. Not declaring it, claiming it doesn’t affect their decisions. Bull. They know the taps turn off if they don’t decide the way their sugar daddies want.

Judges need to be subject to the same ethics requirements as every other federal employee.

It’s ridiculous that a GS9 admin is subject to more stringent ethics requirements than a Supreme Court justice.

So Scalia was a dirty judge too.

Not surprising.

Anonymous wrote:That he had a fully funded fishing expedition with Billionaire Paul Singer who was a named litigant in a pending Supreme Court case.

He should have recused himself from the case as he had promised during his confirmation hearing.

Recall that Scalia was on a fully funded hunting expedition when he died.