Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went on exactly one date with a dude who not only didn't have custody, he had to have supervised visits with his kids. They had to meet in a neutral place, with a social worker present.
I'm so glad that I found this out after the first date.
DTMFA.
One or both in that relationship are toxic. Either way, you should run. Messy home life.
Anonymous wrote:I do not know. It depends and is worth finding out more info.
One of my colleagues lives in an expensive city in a small place. The dad is remarried and lives in a spacious house so the kids live there. I am not sure if my colleague technically has shared custody or not but they don’t have room in their small place for kids. Money is an issue, I think.
My colleague picks their kids up from school and sees them on weekends and holidays.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is their explanation for the fill custody situation?
Barring they decided to relocate to a major career bump and then they have the kids in the summer or major breaks, there aren’t very flattering reasons for giving up ALL custody.
I know very busy career men who have 20% but it’s clear they were far from the default or half parent before or currently. I don’t want kids so I don’t care. If I did want kids and a present partner I’d really avoid work addicts.
This
Anonymous wrote:RED FLAG.
IMO the best is every other week custody. That way you know he isnt an ass who didnt get custody of his kids, but you can be with him alone a full week every other week.
I started out dating someone on that schedule and now he has full custody. Full custody sucks. He just doesn't have much time for me. If we break up, I am only dating guys whose kids have fully launched.
Anonymous wrote:I went on exactly one date with a dude who not only didn't have custody, he had to have supervised visits with his kids. They had to meet in a neutral place, with a social worker present.
I'm so glad that I found this out after the first date.
DTMFA.