Anonymous wrote:Pretty sure these Fed Soc judges are trying to goad the Administration into ignoring judicial rulings, thereby setting the stage for a Biden impeachment.

Biden doesn't need to ignore anything. His ruling doesn't require to the FDA to do anything or not do anything. It purports to "stay" the FDA's approval of Mifepristone, so it will essentially be an unapproved drug. But that doesn't mean the FDA has to do anything to those that continue to sell it or prescribe it. By contrast, the WA ruling orders FDA not to do anything that would alter the status quo so it basically prohibits FDA from taking any enforcement action. If the 5th Circuit and SCOTUS don't weigh in, FDA will just announce that they won't take enforcement action against anyone, which is in compliance with both orders.

Biden would never ignore a court ruling. I am surprised SCOTUS has not already rule Biden is not president and he must vacate the office immediately.

Biden would leave and all the other moderate democrats would support the ruling. They are living in the 1970’s.

Anonymous wrote:Pretty sure these Fed Soc judges are trying to goad the Administration into ignoring judicial rulings, thereby setting the stage for a Biden impeachment.

Oh they are going to impeach Biden as soon as they can. They have already said they will.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pretty sure these Fed Soc judges are trying to goad the Administration into ignoring judicial rulings, thereby setting the stage for a Biden impeachment.

Please explain further how either challenging or ignoring ruling by an separate and independent branch of government I’d an impeachable offense.

An impeachable offense is anything 50%+1 of the House of Representatives is willing to vote for. A removable offense is anything 2/3 of the Senate is willing to vote for. It's a political action. There is no legal standard.

Anonymous wrote:Pretty sure these Fed Soc judges are trying to goad the Administration into ignoring judicial rulings, thereby setting the stage for a Biden impeachment.

Please explain further how either challenging or ignoring ruling by an separate and independent branch of government I’d an impeachable offense.

Gotta love these small government conservatives.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Holy crap. This should be shouted from the rooftops.

JUDGE USED FAKE DATA IN RULING AGAINST ABORTION PILLS

He should be impeached.

This is horrifying. An actual federal judge doesn’t understand facts and laws. I thought the right hated activist judges…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Holy crap. This should be shouted from the rooftops.

JUDGE USED FAKE DATA IN RULING AGAINST ABORTION PILLS

He should be impeached.

He won't be. If democrats ever get senators who will vote like democrats, Amarillo needs a few more judges

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Holy crap. This should be shouted from the rooftops.

JUDGE USED FAKE DATA IN RULING AGAINST ABORTION PILLS

He should be impeached.

Please let this go to SCOTUS so we can all hear KBJ rip him a new one.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Holy crap. This should be shouted from the rooftops.

JUDGE USED FAKE DATA IN RULING AGAINST ABORTION PILLS

He should be impeached.

Anonymous wrote:

Viagra is MUCH more deadly.

Just saying.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read this is the first time in history that a judge has overruled the FDA on a decision that a drug is safe and effective. And it's on a drug that has an extremely safe track record; if this one isn't safe, then lots and lots of drugs are at risk.

+1 This is great.

It has nothing to do with drug safety. It has everything to do with radical right wing judicial activism.

Pretty sure these Fed Soc judges are trying to goad the Administration into ignoring judicial rulings, thereby setting the stage for a Biden impeachment.