Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Don't speak in riddles and try to manipulate the depraved slaughter of innocent s like 9 11 for political advantage. We already have George Santos in the govt who tried to use 911 for his political advantage and he is despised for it. (Except by weakling republicans who let him sit there in Congress and collect a paycheck )
So no answer. Got it, thanks.
Ramaswarmy is the one that won't answer.
Correction. Ramasmarmy. Say what you mean about that day and if you try to speed bullcrap about it to get votes you know where you can go.
He did say what he means. He does not believe the government was fully honest or transparent about the situation.
You should know about "noble lies".
What dishonesty? Don't hint and dance and spew bullcrap. What is he talking about?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Don't speak in riddles and try to manipulate the depraved slaughter of innocent s like 9 11 for political advantage. We already have George Santos in the govt who tried to use 911 for his political advantage and he is despised for it. (Except by weakling republicans who let him sit there in Congress and collect a paycheck )
So no answer. Got it, thanks.
Ramaswarmy is the one that won't answer.
Correction. Ramasmarmy. Say what you mean about that day and if you try to speed bullcrap about it to get votes you know where you can go.
He did say what he means. He does not believe the government was fully honest or transparent about the situation.
You should know about "noble lies".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Don't speak in riddles and try to manipulate the depraved slaughter of innocent s like 9 11 for political advantage. We already have George Santos in the govt who tried to use 911 for his political advantage and he is despised for it. (Except by weakling republicans who let him sit there in Congress and collect a paycheck )
So no answer. Got it, thanks.
Ramaswarmy is the one that won't answer.
Correction. Ramasmarmy. Say what you mean about that day and if you try to speed bullcrap about it to get votes you know where you can go.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Don't speak in riddles and try to manipulate the depraved slaughter of innocent s like 9 11 for political advantage. We already have George Santos in the govt who tried to use 911 for his political advantage and he is despised for it. (Except by weakling republicans who let him sit there in Congress and collect a paycheck )
So no answer. Got it, thanks.
Ramaswarmy is the one that won't answer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Don't speak in riddles and try to manipulate the depraved slaughter of innocent s like 9 11 for political advantage. We already have George Santos in the govt who tried to use 911 for his political advantage and he is despised for it. (Except by weakling republicans who let him sit there in Congress and collect a paycheck )
So no answer. Got it, thanks.
Anonymous wrote:
Don't speak in riddles and try to manipulate the depraved slaughter of innocent s like 9 11 for political advantage. We already have George Santos in the govt who tried to use 911 for his political advantage and he is despised for it. (Except by weakling republicans who let him sit there in Congress and collect a paycheck )
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just another guy who will say any stupid shit he thinks will appeal to the bigots and fascists in the Republican base. Nothing he says makes any sense, he just throws out nonsense full of the magic trigger words that Republicans love to hate. I suspect that none of these guys actually believe in anything except their own entitlement to the spotlight.
He would crush you in a debate.
Well I’m not running for President, but I admit I would be disadvantaged in a debate with him and the other GOP sociopaths who have the ability to spit out endless streams of ridiculous nonsense full of right-wing trigger words with a straight face.
I have 30+ years of public policy expertise so I know how the government works, what is and isn’t Constitutional, what is and isn’t politically feasible, and a lot of facts and truth about history and public policy, but arguments based on knowledge are no good in a Republican debate.