Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is someone from Duke admissions paying people on this thread? Duke isn't elite. I don't know anyone who considers it to be so, either.
True Dook is just a basketball school. Actually not anymore after ratface left, terrible season this year and they're only going to get worse from here.
Do you Duke haters have better things to do? It’s astounding how Duke lives in your head rent-free given your dislike for the school, it’s starting to sound vain. Would happily send my kid to Duke over many ivies
Duke alumni put a target on their back by obnoxiously trumpeting how good their school is. The response is never going to be great.
I’ve literally never heard a Duke alum talk about their school outside the context of basketball… they have school pride for sure but not in a “we’re academically better than everyone” way
Duke is bad but UVA grads take the trophy on being obnoxious and delusional in acting like UVA is top 5.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think posters here are confusing Harvard with UVA when discussing STEM
They both are bad at STEM.
There isn't a school in the world ahead of Harvard in the science and math part of STEM.
Berkeley is a close second and doing it with less money and less support and other disadvantages. Berkeley might even have more graduate programs in the top ten across all academic areas than Harvard already given how weak Harvard is in engineering and CS.
Only at the graduate level. Not for undergrad.
lol Berkeley is one of the "six global superbrands"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think posters here are confusing Harvard with UVA when discussing STEM
They both are bad at STEM.
There isn't a school in the world ahead of Harvard in the science and math part of STEM.
Berkeley is a close second and doing it with less money and less support and other disadvantages. Berkeley might even have more graduate programs in the top ten across all academic areas than Harvard already given how weak Harvard is in engineering and CS.
Only at the graduate level. Not for undergrad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The most prestigious LACs in my experience have been Barnard and Wellesley, not Williams and Amherst.
Lmao. Barnard is widely viewed as a backdoor into Columbia.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think posters here are confusing Harvard with UVA when discussing STEM
They both are bad at STEM.
There isn't a school in the world ahead of Harvard in the science and math part of STEM.
Berkeley is a close second and doing it with less money and less support and other disadvantages. Berkeley might even have more graduate programs in the top ten across all academic areas than Harvard already given how weak Harvard is in engineering and CS.
Only at the graduate level. Not for undergrad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think posters here are confusing Harvard with UVA when discussing STEM
They both are bad at STEM.
There isn't a school in the world ahead of Harvard in the science and math part of STEM.
Berkeley is a close second and doing it with less money and less support and other disadvantages. Berkeley might even have more graduate programs in the top ten across all academic areas than Harvard already given how weak Harvard is in engineering and CS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The most prestigious LACs in my experience have been Barnard and Wellesley, not Williams and Amherst.
Lmao. Barnard is widely viewed as a backdoor into Columbia.
Only on dcum
No... in real life, sadly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The most prestigious LACs in my experience have been Barnard and Wellesley, not Williams and Amherst.
Lmao. Barnard is widely viewed as a backdoor into Columbia.
Only on dcum
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The most prestigious LACs in my experience have been Barnard and Wellesley, not Williams and Amherst.
Lmao. Barnard is widely viewed as a backdoor into Columbia.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The most prestigious LACs in my experience have been Barnard and Wellesley, not Williams and Amherst.
Lmao. Barnard is widely viewed as a backdoor into Columbia.
Anonymous wrote:The most prestigious LACs in my experience have been Barnard and Wellesley, not Williams and Amherst.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think posters here are confusing Harvard with UVA when discussing STEM
They both are bad at STEM.
There isn't a school in the world ahead of Harvard in the science and math part of STEM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is someone from Duke admissions paying people on this thread? Duke isn't elite. I don't know anyone who considers it to be so, either.
True Dook is just a basketball school. Actually not anymore after ratface left, terrible season this year and they're only going to get worse from here.
Do you Duke haters have better things to do? It’s astounding how Duke lives in your head rent-free given your dislike for the school, it’s starting to sound vain. Would happily send my kid to Duke over many ivies
Duke and ND haters on this board..."Duke is a basketball school...ND is a football school." Yes they are, but they are also academic powerhouses. How amazing to have elite sports AND education.