Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of incels hate single mothers because they can’t stand that men are becoming less wanted and needed.
Some people here have this weirdly skewed view of a single mother as a corporate boss babe who couldn't find a man to measure up so decided to go it alone and have a baby by herself at 39.
A lot of people who use the term “single mom by choice” do so to try to separate themselves from single moms who were instead “knocked up.”
Yes, you're right. A certain class consciousness to that distinction.
Very, very few are single mothers "not by choice". They're just different types of choices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All male newborns DNA should be in a data bank and every child born to a single woman DNA should be checked against DNA data bank. Then father is found and is jailed for nine months--same as gestation period--uoon release, he is responsible for child to age 22.
Let me guess. You're a "liberal" 😀🤣😂
Unlike conservatives, liberals believe in personal responsibility. That includes fathers taking responsibility for their kids.
Really? Lady, you vote for the party that glorifies fatherless upbringing!
Funny, almost every liberal I know has been in a long, happy marriage. Only exception was the Catholic aunt who divorced the abusive drug addict she had to marry when he knocked her up back in the 1980s.
The conservatives I know? Whew. Like a Springer show. Punching down is such a favored past time because their lives are such a joke. Kids are a mess. Multiple baby mammas, drugs everywhere. Real family values crowd.
Where do you live honey?
Anonymous wrote:Poligamy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All male newborns DNA should be in a data bank and every child born to a single woman DNA should be checked against DNA data bank. Then father is found and is jailed for nine months--same as gestation period--uoon release, he is responsible for child to age 22.
Let me guess. You're a "liberal" 😀🤣😂
Unlike conservatives, liberals believe in personal responsibility. That includes fathers taking responsibility for their kids.
Really? Lady, you vote for the party that glorifies fatherless upbringing!
Funny, almost every liberal I know has been in a long, happy marriage. Only exception was the Catholic aunt who divorced the abusive drug addict she had to marry when he knocked her up back in the 1980s.
The conservatives I know? Whew. Like a Springer show. Punching down is such a favored past time because their lives are such a joke. Kids are a mess. Multiple baby mammas, drugs everywhere. Real family values crowd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the percentage of families with a single mother?
That percentage is not sustainable. Father figures are important.
You see the effects on society today.
Don't reward single patenting. Staying together is sometimes difficult, but single parenting of close to 50% is not acceptable either. An abusive relationship is a different subject altogether.
But the outcomes are not as good as two parent families in the aggregate.
So I wouldn't cut out subsidies, but I would cut them back and make it less attractive.
How many absent father households are the choice of the mother raising the child(ren)? He is absent because of the father- whether that be choice, jail, disinterest, another family, etc. You are punishing women and children for the choices of the male. Super on brand for our culture but nonetheless deplorable. And two parents don't have to be married or live together to raise a child. Data must separate between single parent households with an involved and financially supportive co-parent (regardless of sex) and those that are single parent household by choice and those that are single parent households without an involved and supportive co-parent. These are three different types of issues and more than likely have different outcomes.
Why are women choosing to get pregnant with such irresponsible men? Perhaps our values are all wrong. Why not question our priorities?
Idc what choices the parents made/make it is not on children to absorb them. Our values? jFC.
Sorry, america needs to learn a bit from the old world that the apple does not fall from the tree that far!
Bastards can redeem themselves but should know about their parents failings
Anonymous wrote:I guess if this is a serious issue we can go back to shaming premartial sex.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the percentage of families with a single mother?
That percentage is not sustainable. Father figures are important.
You see the effects on society today.
Don't reward single patenting. Staying together is sometimes difficult, but single parenting of close to 50% is not acceptable either. An abusive relationship is a different subject altogether.
But the outcomes are not as good as two parent families in the aggregate.
So I wouldn't cut out subsidies, but I would cut them back and make it less attractive.
How many absent father households are the choice of the mother raising the child(ren)? He is absent because of the father- whether that be choice, jail, disinterest, another family, etc. You are punishing women and children for the choices of the male. Super on brand for our culture but nonetheless deplorable. And two parents don't have to be married or live together to raise a child. Data must separate between single parent households with an involved and financially supportive co-parent (regardless of sex) and those that are single parent household by choice and those that are single parent households without an involved and supportive co-parent. These are three different types of issues and more than likely have different outcomes.
Why are women choosing to get pregnant with such irresponsible men? Perhaps our values are all wrong. Why not question our priorities?
Idc what choices the parents made/make it is not on children to absorb them. Our values? jFC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All male newborns DNA should be in a data bank and every child born to a single woman DNA should be checked against DNA data bank. Then father is found and is jailed for nine months--same as gestation period--uoon release, he is responsible for child to age 22.
Let me guess. You're a "liberal" 😀🤣😂
Unlike conservatives, liberals believe in personal responsibility. That includes fathers taking responsibility for their kids.
Really? Lady, you vote for the party that glorifies fatherless upbringing!