Anonymous wrote:A “starter home” (obnoxious phase anyways) is generally not in one’s dream size, condition, and/or location. Our starter home was a lovely SFH further out but on the MARC line. Commute sucked a bit pre-COVID, mortgage and the resulting equity and savings sure didn’t. Put us in a terrific financial position.
We’re 36 with one young kid and another on the way. Student debt, no help with down payments…your typical older Millennials.
People may want to stretch themselves and buy closer in or pick renting over buying, which can both be totally valid choices. But gimme a break with the premise of this thread.
This. We still live in our starter home, which is a 2-bedroom condo with an okay but not great school that is convenient to our jobs and is appreciating alright. If we plan well and catch a break, we hope to upgrade to a 3 bedroom house with better schools (especially MS/HS) with a worse commute but better appreciation.
This is the norm for middle class families. The people buying $1.5m SFHs in nice neighborhoods with great schools are wealthy and do not need to buy "starter homes" in order to start climbing the housing ladder. Many of them likely already bought condos in the city near their work with money from mom and dad, and are simply upgrading now that they are married with kids. They will have lots of options, though yes, they may not be able to afford the very best neighborhoods with the very best schools. Boo hoo.
Although having met people like this before, often they will complain that they simply cannot afford what they want and then magically they do afford it because they have access to the Bank of Mom and Dad and all they have to do is announce a new baby or complain hard enough to get a no-interest loan they never intend to repay.
These aren't real problems.