Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nah, I hear it’s a great school, I wouldn’t pull my kids out. This could happen anywhere. I know some of the teachers there and the head of the school and middle school, their own kids go there. I’m sure they had no idea, the abuse happened outside of school.
The ‘could happen anywhere’ is a grand myth, and has been explained in detail upthread. Any school harboring a rapist is not a great school to most parents.
Except it does happen everywhere, unfortunately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nah, I hear it’s a great school, I wouldn’t pull my kids out. This could happen anywhere. I know some of the teachers there and the head of the school and middle school, their own kids go there. I’m sure they had no idea, the abuse happened outside of school.
The ‘could happen anywhere’ is a grand myth, and has been explained in detail upthread. Any school harboring a rapist is not a great school to most parents.
Anonymous wrote:For sure if the school administration knew there was a rapist among them, that would be an issue.
Anonymous wrote:Nah, I hear it’s a great school, I wouldn’t pull my kids out. This could happen anywhere. I know some of the teachers there and the head of the school and middle school, their own kids go there. I’m sure they had no idea, the abuse happened outside of school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To whom it may concern:
Please shut-up with the “it can happen anywhere” garbage. What has been happening at Gilman, happens only where school administration chooses to allow rumors of abuse/rape to go unreported to the police department. Schools have a LEGAL obligation to report POSSIBLE abuse of students. It’s NOT the school’s job to determine if a rumor has merit or not.
Gilman does not have trained investigators on its payroll. Gilman should have reported to police the FIRST rumor of their students getting alcohol from a teacher. They broke the law right there. Of course no one will be held accountable for their silence.
Who cares that the perpetrator was a former student, or that his father is well liked in the community? Apparently, administrators cared a lot about protecting the ongoing sexual abuse of its students. Someone (besides the rapist teacher) MUST be held accountable for this atrocity perpetrated on these young boys. Victims of sexual abuse typically need years and years of very high quality therapy. The police are begging other victims to please come forward. We all know, however, that most victims choose not to speak of their abuse. It’s just to painful and not worth the ordeal of going public with this sort of thing. May God give them strength. My heart breaks for what they endured.
There were not previous rumors of abuse/rape.
That you know of - the point is the school may have known or suspected inappropriate conduct at the very least with the drinking and close relationships. Enough to put a stop to it.
I would know as I have a child in the upper school, and like many in the community, know far more than has been reported. What your suggesting is not how it became known.
How did it become known then? I assumed it was because of the investigation going on. Is that not the case?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To whom it may concern:
Please shut-up with the “it can happen anywhere” garbage. What has been happening at Gilman, happens only where school administration chooses to allow rumors of abuse/rape to go unreported to the police department. Schools have a LEGAL obligation to report POSSIBLE abuse of students. It’s NOT the school’s job to determine if a rumor has merit or not.
Gilman does not have trained investigators on its payroll. Gilman should have reported to police the FIRST rumor of their students getting alcohol from a teacher. They broke the law right there. Of course no one will be held accountable for their silence.
Who cares that the perpetrator was a former student, or that his father is well liked in the community? Apparently, administrators cared a lot about protecting the ongoing sexual abuse of its students. Someone (besides the rapist teacher) MUST be held accountable for this atrocity perpetrated on these young boys. Victims of sexual abuse typically need years and years of very high quality therapy. The police are begging other victims to please come forward. We all know, however, that most victims choose not to speak of their abuse. It’s just to painful and not worth the ordeal of going public with this sort of thing. May God give them strength. My heart breaks for what they endured.
There were not previous rumors of abuse/rape.
That you know of - the point is the school may have known or suspected inappropriate conduct at the very least with the drinking and close relationships. Enough to put a stop to it.
I would know as I have a child in the upper school, and like many in the community, know far more than has been reported. What your suggesting is not how it became known.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’ll be interesting to see how long the father of the rapist teacher is allowed to sit on the school’s board. Some harsh changes must be immediately implemented, and his presence is a hindrance.
Why should the father take responsibility for the heinous actions of his adult 38 year old son?
I don’t think he is on the board.
Of course you don’t think the father of a rapist is on the school board. Lol. Are you trying to say he just got fired?
I am saying there is a list of board members on the school’s website and he is not listed as a board member. He may have been in the past. All board members cycle off after 4 years.
I’ll say you sure sound like a seasoned lawyer, for the school. Not expecting you to admit to anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’ll be interesting to see how long the father of the rapist teacher is allowed to sit on the school’s board. Some harsh changes must be immediately implemented, and his presence is a hindrance.
Why should the father take responsibility for the heinous actions of his adult 38 year old son?
I don’t think he is on the board.
Of course you don’t think the father of a rapist is on the school board. Lol. Are you trying to say he just got fired?
I am saying there is a list of board members on the school’s website and he is not listed as a board member. He may have been in the past. All board members cycle off after 4 years.