jsteele wrote:I have just received a letter from the law office of Rollins, Smalkin, Richards, and Mackie threatening all sorts of legal repercussions if I don't remove this thread. At this time, I will not remove this thread.
As many of you have noticed, I have removed many posts from this thread. Those posts were reported to me via the "report" button that is present on every post. I believed the posts that I removed to be off-topic, in most cases mentioning individuals who are not directly involved in the subject of this thread.
The lawyer who has been in touch feels that there are many remaining posts that are defamatory. I have informed the lawyer that I will not remove the thread. However, I will comply with any legally-issued subpoenas for IP addresses.
If you are the author of a post in this thread and do not wish to have your IP address potentially turned over, you are welcome to "report" your own post and ask for it to be removed. However, that report will have to come from the same IP address as the post that you are reporting. That's the only way that I can know that it is you making the request.
In addition, the original poster of the thread can request to have the entire thread removed. However, the same stipulation will apply. I will need to be sure that such a request is actually coming from the original poster.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:I have just received a letter from the law office of Rollins, Smalkin, Richards, and Mackie threatening all sorts of legal repercussions if I don't remove this thread. At this time, I will not remove this thread.
As many of you have noticed, I have removed many posts from this thread. Those posts were reported to me via the "report" button that is present on every post. I believed the posts that I removed to be off-topic, in most cases mentioning individuals who are not directly involved in the subject of this thread.
The lawyer who has been in touch feels that there are many remaining posts that are defamatory. I have informed the lawyer that I will not remove the thread. However, I will comply with any legally-issued subpoenas for IP addresses.
If you are the author of a post in this thread and do not wish to have your IP address potentially turned over, you are welcome to "report" your own post and ask for it to be removed. However, that report will have to come from the same IP address as the post that you are reporting. That's the only way that I can know that it is you making the request.
In addition, the original poster of the thread can request to have the entire thread removed. However, the same stipulation will apply. I will need to be sure that such a request is actually coming from the original poster.
Omar and his legal team have a lot more to worry about than defaming his name. He STOLE money from lots of people and have ruined their lives. He has way more to worry about than his name being defamed. I would advise his lawyers to worry about their criminal of a client than those of us over here dealing with the reprocutions of his actions!
jsteele wrote:I have just received a letter from the law office of Rollins, Smalkin, Richards, and Mackie threatening all sorts of legal repercussions if I don't remove this thread. At this time, I will not remove this thread.
As many of you have noticed, I have removed many posts from this thread. Those posts were reported to me via the "report" button that is present on every post. I believed the posts that I removed to be off-topic, in most cases mentioning individuals who are not directly involved in the subject of this thread.
The lawyer who has been in touch feels that there are many remaining posts that are defamatory. I have informed the lawyer that I will not remove the thread. However, I will comply with any legally-issued subpoenas for IP addresses.
If you are the author of a post in this thread and do not wish to have your IP address potentially turned over, you are welcome to "report" your own post and ask for it to be removed. However, that report will have to come from the same IP address as the post that you are reporting. That's the only way that I can know that it is you making the request.
In addition, the original poster of the thread can request to have the entire thread removed. However, the same stipulation will apply. I will need to be sure that such a request is actually coming from the original poster.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Optimum Construction Inc filed Amended Statement of Financial Affairs and Amended schedules today. Adding and correcting the filing. Added some clarity to make it easier to see exactly how many home owners have been impacted. New classification of "incomplete contract" as the basis for creditors being listed. I read this as: people Omar took payments from but did not complete (or even start) the project. Could be wrong, but that is what I would think? Only 37 of them and that does not include the ones that were had or were already fighting in court. Nothing to see here.
37 seems like a lot
In the bankruptcy filing you can count off at least 37 individual claims each with their own addresses and names. It is beyond crazy how many people omar has harmed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Optimum Construction Inc filed Amended Statement of Financial Affairs and Amended schedules today. Adding and correcting the filing. Added some clarity to make it easier to see exactly how many home owners have been impacted. New classification of "incomplete contract" as the basis for creditors being listed. I read this as: people Omar took payments from but did not complete (or even start) the project. Could be wrong, but that is what I would think? Only 37 of them and that does not include the ones that were had or were already fighting in court. Nothing to see here.
37 seems like a lot
Anonymous wrote:Optimum Construction Inc filed Amended Statement of Financial Affairs and Amended schedules today. Adding and correcting the filing. Added some clarity to make it easier to see exactly how many home owners have been impacted. New classification of "incomplete contract" as the basis for creditors being listed. I read this as: people Omar took payments from but did not complete (or even start) the project. Could be wrong, but that is what I would think? Only 37 of them and that does not include the ones that were had or were already fighting in court. Nothing to see here.