Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Grinnell works for some, but not for all. It is a very wealthy school. Very liberal.
Wrong again. Yes, it’s liberal. But it is not wealthy at all, especially when compared to other elite liberal arts colleges. Do your research before spouting off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Grinnell works for some, but not for all. It is a very wealthy school. Very liberal.
Wrong again. Yes, it’s liberal. But it is not wealthy at all, especially when compared to other elite liberal arts colleges. Do your research before spouting off.
Anonymous wrote:Grinnell works for some, but not for all. It is a very wealthy school. Very liberal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The "preppier" LACs like Williams, Amherst, Colgate, Colby, etc. tend to have good career outcomes right out of undergrad.
The "crunchier" ones like Grinnell, Carleton, Pomona, Oberlin, etc. have very little on-campus recruiting -- the vast majority of students go to grad school (often a PhD, which have questionable ROI).
My kid is a Grinnell grad married to a Grinnell grad. They both have excellent jobs and landed them right off the bat, and all of their friends from college are doing equally well or better. Some went on to grad school, some didn’t. One got a PhD. All did fine.
I don’t think I know anyone from any college who got their job through on campus recruiting, honestly. I’m sure it happens, but I would never advise a kid to pick a school based on who recruits on campus. Most graduates get their jobs by casting wide nets.
Also, on the PhD front, while it’s certainly true that graduates of SLACs tend to get PhDs in disproportionately large numbers, it’s still the case that the overwhelming majority of SLAC grads don’t go on to get a PhD.
Grinnell College is a great school if you fit in. And that is the primary concern about LACs or about any small community--especially if isolated.
Rural, isolated, ultra-liberal, ultra wealthy, politically correct school that is heaven for some and not-so-nice for most.
Glad your kid did well, but the fact is that Grinnell has a very poor ROI unless you major in computer science or economics.
Learn to read. I didn’t just talk about my kid. I talked about my kid, my kid’s spouse, and every single one of their friends.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The "preppier" LACs like Williams, Amherst, Colgate, Colby, etc. tend to have good career outcomes right out of undergrad.
The "crunchier" ones like Grinnell, Carleton, Pomona, Oberlin, etc. have very little on-campus recruiting -- the vast majority of students go to grad school (often a PhD, which have questionable ROI).
My kid is a Grinnell grad married to a Grinnell grad. They both have excellent jobs and landed them right off the bat, and all of their friends from college are doing equally well or better. Some went on to grad school, some didn’t. One got a PhD. All did fine.
I don’t think I know anyone from any college who got their job through on campus recruiting, honestly. I’m sure it happens, but I would never advise a kid to pick a school based on who recruits on campus. Most graduates get their jobs by casting wide nets.
Also, on the PhD front, while it’s certainly true that graduates of SLACs tend to get PhDs in disproportionately large numbers, it’s still the case that the overwhelming majority of SLAC grads don’t go on to get a PhD.
Glad your kid did well, but the fact is that Grinnell has a very poor ROI unless you major in computer science or economics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have read through this thread. Why are the SLAC/LAC supporters so angry ? They come across as unhinged and militant.
Really? I think it's the anti-LAC crowd that seems unhinged/militant. Why do they care so much that some students prefer a small college?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have read through this thread. Why are the SLAC/LAC supporters so angry ? They come across as unhinged and militant.
Really? I think it's the anti-LAC crowd that seems unhinged/militant. Why do they care so much that some students prefer a small college?
Anonymous wrote:I have read through this thread. Why are the SLAC/LAC supporters so angry ? They come across as unhinged and militant.
Anonymous wrote:Why are the obsessed anti/SLAC posters so obsessed? It’s really sad. If you think they are inferior, why are you threatened by them? And why not be happy that those students aren’t taking up spots in the schools you covet?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid (who just graduated from an SLAC) had many more leadership and research opportunities then she would have at a large public. The community is so small that no one goes unnoticed (in a good way). She really emerged and shone.
Plus, because there are only undergrads to staff the labs, she had her choice of research opportunities and parlayed that into 3 or 4 peer reviewed publications as an undergrad. I doubt that would have happened at a large RO1 university.
Although I see more advantages in attending private National Universities and large public honors colleges than small, rural, isolated LACs, I do think that the above post presents a reasonable position. The post indicates that there is less competition at his or her kid's SLAC which has some advantages and benefits.
What about SLACs in urban areas?
What SLACs are in urban areas? Macalaster in a more suburban part of St Paul. Love to know about other ones.
Off the top of my head, the Claremont Colleges and others in the LA area. Are they an outlier and SLACs tend to be more small town?
Claremont Colleges are in suburbia. Not urban.