Anonymous
09/30/2022 17:35
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
People are replying to Sarah's request for topics and most mimic want we're saying here. They want to know why Divorce #2 happened, whats the deal with IJ, and they're telling Sarah not to interrupt Natasha! :lol
Anonymous
09/30/2022 17:33
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
So she wants people to post videos of themselves asking questions for the part #3. Um no. People want to now why she is broke after divorcing Kane, but even if someone does post a video, doubt she will answer. It's basically away to make sure sycophants are the ones asking the questions for podcast 3. I approve of the other 2 and respect mostly how she handled those. Doubt I will tune in for the 3rd. She needs to allow anonymous questions and be willing to go there.
Anonymous
09/30/2022 11:33
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
Wait, I just learned that IJ has “guardianship” of the dog skittles who belong to Kane and the girls. What the what?
Anonymous
09/30/2022 08:05
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One thing that confused me was she said they separated in 2012. But wasn’t it 2015 where he was on the air announcing their divorce? And she has posts between 2012-2015 on her blog that do not make it appear that they were separated?
She did say she was bad with dates and math.
I mean, during the custody talk she said that they ended up with a 60/50 custody agreement lol. Still not sure if she meant 50/50 or 60/40.
And he died in 2021, not in 2020
It’s pretty common after you go through major trauma to confuse specific date/time periods. There’s a brain fog that occurs and can last for several years.
Anonymous
09/29/2022 23:09
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
Anonymous wrote:I noticed how they mention Eric, Samy, Mel and Dani by name. But never IJ. They kid alluded to him at points but never by name. I wonder if there is some legal thing going on with that...
Wonder if he has a relationship with IJ
Anonymous
09/29/2022 23:09
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One thing that confused me was she said they separated in 2012. But wasn’t it 2015 where he was on the air announcing their divorce? And she has posts between 2012-2015 on her blog that do not make it appear that they were separated?
She did say she was bad with dates and math.
I mean, during the custody talk she said that they ended up with a 60/50 custody agreement lol. Still not sure if she meant 50/50 or 60/40.
And he died in 2021, not in 2020
Anonymous
09/29/2022 21:40
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
Anonymous wrote:I noticed how they mention Eric, Samy, Mel and Dani by name. But never IJ. They kid alluded to him at points but never by name. I wonder if there is some legal thing going on with that...
Same here that was weird.... but also I remember some shade thrown at IJ when he did the dedication show for Kane in honor of the girls. Saying things like "the girls will always have this show to remember him by". Someone was like - IJ hasn't even seen those girls in years and shouldn't be acting like they have a relationship bc they don't!
Anonymous
09/29/2022 19:36
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sarah is asking fans what else they want to know from Natasha on her IG feed - they are thinking about doing an episode 3.
How about just let Natasha tell her story without Sarah there and without ads.
Sarah also posted that this episode broke her record for streams. Which, if I were Sarah, I wouldn’t take positively:even after all these years, people are only listening to her because they are interested in the kane show drama.
I was thinking the same thing! For all Sarah (and Danni, and Natasha…) have tried to portray themselves as independent and successful on their own merits, doesn’t it sting that what gets them the most attention/engagement is speaking about a man? Not just a man, but a man who has been dead for years and somehow still generates more interest than any of you? It’s so strange. I would feel kind of dirty still speaking about him if I were them. By now everyone knew Kane AND Natasha had addiction issues. No sh*t. There was no need to bring awareness to anything. Natasha is just desperate to, once again, avoid working a real job with her basic, bland crafts. And Sarah is as always just trying to hustle any way she can since her TV career she wanted so badly floundered.
Anonymous
09/29/2022 12:24
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
I noticed how they mention Eric, Samy, Mel and Dani by name. But never IJ. They kid alluded to him at points but never by name. I wonder if there is some legal thing going on with that...
Anonymous
09/29/2022 00:27
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sarah is asking fans what else they want to know from Natasha on her IG feed - they are thinking about doing an episode 3.
How about just let Natasha tell her story without Sarah there and without ads.
Sarah also posted that this episode broke her record for streams. Which, if I were Sarah, I wouldn’t take positively:even after all these years, people are only listening to her because they are interested in the kane show drama.
Anonymous
09/28/2022 22:55
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
Anonymous wrote:Sarah is asking fans what else they want to know from Natasha on her IG feed - they are thinking about doing an episode 3.
How about just let Natasha tell her story without Sarah there and without ads.
Anonymous
09/28/2022 22:51
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
Sarah is asking fans what else they want to know from Natasha on her IG feed - they are thinking about doing an episode 3.
Anonymous
09/28/2022 22:50
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She can both have given a fair accounting to Kane AND ALSO be trying to line her pockets and build her celebrity using the story. Literally no one would know or care anymore if she just lived a private life and moved on. We have a short attention span and stop caring about someone’s scandal as soon as it’s quiet for awhile. Instead she’s rehashing the drama keeping it in the public mind and adding details to keep resell relevant.
I’m curious what the end game is. It kind of seems like she is angling for a career as a podcaster/advice coach on these issues.
I think just general “influencer” - put out very general women empowerment type statements, talk about her “mama bear tribe” or whatever she’s going to call her following etc. No real POV, just an angle to be someone and feel important and loved
She mentioned that her Etsy shop would be launching again soon and that she wants to get back to writing/blogging.
She also mentioned wanting to work with other women going through divorce and custody issues to help them understand their rights and services that are available to them. She said she didn't have that and when she ran out of money, she gave in to all his demands because she felt like that was the end of her fight. She didn't realize she could have kept going on her own.
I think that it is very important for people to know that if you don't have the money, you don't have to sign your rights away. I know my brother felt this way during his divorce. My ex-SIL's parents hired a very good, pricy legal team and went for sole custody. He felt like it was over before it even started because he could only afford a lawyer who would meet him 30 minutes before the hearings, go over things then, and represent him for that short time. I think he paid like $300/hr while the lawyer was in court and $75 for the pre-court meetings. Another lawyer in court one of the days pulled him aside to give him resources for people in his position. One of those included representing himself. He went that route and ended up with 50/50 custody like he wanted and the ruling that my niece couldn't be moved out of the state of VA without ex-SIL paying for all my niece's travel to/from visits with him or travel for my brother to visit her in another state (she and her future husband wanted to move to Colorado).
real question (as i not implying natasha was lying about it)....how are you broke immediately after divorcing someone who has presumably made millions while married to you? even if marital assets weren't split 50/50, it seems like she would have walked away with a reasonable chunk that could have paid for good legal help
They may have had a tight pre-nup.
How big of a deal was he before they married? I thought when he moved to Dc he was still up and coming and didn’t become syndicated until a few years later after being here?
She mentioned on the podcast that they were struggling when they first moved up here. That doesn't mean the didn't do a pre- or post- nup (particularly after he got syndicated, etc).
Anonymous
09/28/2022 21:56
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She can both have given a fair accounting to Kane AND ALSO be trying to line her pockets and build her celebrity using the story. Literally no one would know or care anymore if she just lived a private life and moved on. We have a short attention span and stop caring about someone’s scandal as soon as it’s quiet for awhile. Instead she’s rehashing the drama keeping it in the public mind and adding details to keep resell relevant.
I’m curious what the end game is. It kind of seems like she is angling for a career as a podcaster/advice coach on these issues.
I think just general “influencer” - put out very general women empowerment type statements, talk about her “mama bear tribe” or whatever she’s going to call her following etc. No real POV, just an angle to be someone and feel important and loved
She mentioned that her Etsy shop would be launching again soon and that she wants to get back to writing/blogging.
She also mentioned wanting to work with other women going through divorce and custody issues to help them understand their rights and services that are available to them. She said she didn't have that and when she ran out of money, she gave in to all his demands because she felt like that was the end of her fight. She didn't realize she could have kept going on her own.
I think that it is very important for people to know that if you don't have the money, you don't have to sign your rights away. I know my brother felt this way during his divorce. My ex-SIL's parents hired a very good, pricy legal team and went for sole custody. He felt like it was over before it even started because he could only afford a lawyer who would meet him 30 minutes before the hearings, go over things then, and represent him for that short time. I think he paid like $300/hr while the lawyer was in court and $75 for the pre-court meetings. Another lawyer in court one of the days pulled him aside to give him resources for people in his position. One of those included representing himself. He went that route and ended up with 50/50 custody like he wanted and the ruling that my niece couldn't be moved out of the state of VA without ex-SIL paying for all my niece's travel to/from visits with him or travel for my brother to visit her in another state (she and her future husband wanted to move to Colorado).
real question (as i not implying natasha was lying about it)....how are you broke immediately after divorcing someone who has presumably made millions while married to you? even if marital assets weren't split 50/50, it seems like she would have walked away with a reasonable chunk that could have paid for good legal help
They may have had a tight pre-nup.
How big of a deal was he before they married? I thought when he moved to Dc he was still up and coming and didn’t become syndicated until a few years later after being here?
Anonymous
09/28/2022 21:41
Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She can both have given a fair accounting to Kane AND ALSO be trying to line her pockets and build her celebrity using the story. Literally no one would know or care anymore if she just lived a private life and moved on. We have a short attention span and stop caring about someone’s scandal as soon as it’s quiet for awhile. Instead she’s rehashing the drama keeping it in the public mind and adding details to keep resell relevant.
I’m curious what the end game is. It kind of seems like she is angling for a career as a podcaster/advice coach on these issues.
I think just general “influencer” - put out very general women empowerment type statements, talk about her “mama bear tribe” or whatever she’s going to call her following etc. No real POV, just an angle to be someone and feel important and loved
She mentioned that her Etsy shop would be launching again soon and that she wants to get back to writing/blogging.
She also mentioned wanting to work with other women going through divorce and custody issues to help them understand their rights and services that are available to them. She said she didn't have that and when she ran out of money, she gave in to all his demands because she felt like that was the end of her fight. She didn't realize she could have kept going on her own.
I think that it is very important for people to know that if you don't have the money, you don't have to sign your rights away. I know my brother felt this way during his divorce. My ex-SIL's parents hired a very good, pricy legal team and went for sole custody. He felt like it was over before it even started because he could only afford a lawyer who would meet him 30 minutes before the hearings, go over things then, and represent him for that short time. I think he paid like $300/hr while the lawyer was in court and $75 for the pre-court meetings. Another lawyer in court one of the days pulled him aside to give him resources for people in his position. One of those included representing himself. He went that route and ended up with 50/50 custody like he wanted and the ruling that my niece couldn't be moved out of the state of VA without ex-SIL paying for all my niece's travel to/from visits with him or travel for my brother to visit her in another state (she and her future husband wanted to move to Colorado).
real question (as i not implying natasha was lying about it)....how are you broke immediately after divorcing someone who has presumably made millions while married to you? even if marital assets weren't split 50/50, it seems like she would have walked away with a reasonable chunk that could have paid for good legal help
They may have had a tight pre-nup.