Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A legally binding prenup requires the wife to be represented by counsel, who will tell her not to sign anything stupid like giving up all alimony.

I’m a big fan of pre-nups (think almost everyone should have them) but you don’t seem to understand the basics of a pre-nup.

I have one and am very familiar. I know all about both parties needing to disclose assets and have counsel for it to be legally enforceable.

So then you know competent counsel doesn’t let their clients waive alimony unless there are offsets. There’s no prenup of “completely impoverish her as soon as you’re done screwing her” that a court won’t throw out.

Attorney’s will advise. In Maryland an alimony waiver will be enforced unless the spouse is likely to be a public charge. Please look up the case law on Google Scholar.

What’s the point of marring a rich guy with a prenup you describe ? She will be better off on herself . A smart young woman won’t sign it and will move on ; the guy will be left with his pick of not very smart baristas

Why all the sneering at baristas?

I think that barista is code for “woman who is attractive, but not well educated or ambitious.”
I think she is a barista because she is based on Rachel from the first season of Friends.

Ok, why the sneering at women who are not well educated?

I don’t really see a lot of sneering.

Education isn’t important to everyone, and that’s fine. But you can’t marry someone who thinks that education and school aren’t important and then expect them to teach your kids to study hard and agree to spend tens of thousands on their college education.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rich can be boring, arrogant, short tempered, disloyal, alcoholic, mentally burdened etc. Just money isn't enough if you are looking for a life long partnership in life and parenting.

Rich men are also profound cheaters and these marriages to SAHM don’t last in 50% cases. Women shouldn’t full themselves: free cheese is only in the mouse trap

Please they just have more women after them. Women and men cheat at the same rate. Who do you think all these men cheat with?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rich can be boring, arrogant, short tempered, disloyal, alcoholic, mentally burdened etc. Just money isn't enough if you are looking for a life long partnership in life and parenting.

Rich men are also profound cheaters and these marriages to SAHM don’t last in 50% cases. Women shouldn’t full themselves: free cheese is only in the mouse trap

Isn’t the divorce rate close to 50% for everyone?

That's what it seems. Educated, older and well employed women have similar divorce rate as young, less educated and unemployed/under employed women.

They tend to initiate the divorce themselves.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rich can be boring, arrogant, short tempered, disloyal, alcoholic, mentally burdened etc. Just money isn't enough if you are looking for a life long partnership in life and parenting.

Rich men are also profound cheaters and these marriages to SAHM don’t last in 50% cases. Women shouldn’t full themselves: free cheese is only in the mouse trap

Isn’t the divorce rate close to 50% for everyone?

That's what it seems. Educated, older and well employed women have similar divorce rate as young, less educated and unemployed/under employed women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A legally binding prenup requires the wife to be represented by counsel, who will tell her not to sign anything stupid like giving up all alimony.

I’m a big fan of pre-nups (think almost everyone should have them) but you don’t seem to understand the basics of a pre-nup.

I have one and am very familiar. I know all about both parties needing to disclose assets and have counsel for it to be legally enforceable.

So then you know competent counsel doesn’t let their clients waive alimony unless there are offsets. There’s no prenup of “completely impoverish her as soon as you’re done screwing her” that a court won’t throw out.

Attorney’s will advise. In Maryland an alimony waiver will be enforced unless the spouse is likely to be a public charge. Please look up the case law on Google Scholar.

What’s the point of marring a rich guy with a prenup you describe ? She will be better off on herself . A smart young woman won’t sign it and will move on ; the guy will be left with his pick of not very smart baristas

Why all the sneering at baristas?

I think that barista is code for “woman who is attractive, but not well educated or ambitious.”
I think she is a barista because she is based on Rachel from the first season of Friends.

Ok, why the sneering at women who are not well educated?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rich can be boring, arrogant, short tempered, disloyal, alcoholic, mentally burdened etc. Just money isn't enough if you are looking for a life long partnership in life and parenting.

Rich men are also profound cheaters and these marriages to SAHM don’t last in 50% cases. Women shouldn’t full themselves: free cheese is only in the mouse trap

Isn’t the divorce rate close to 50% for everyone?

I think it’s around 20% if you wait until your mid-twenties to get married and have at least some college/associates degree or higher.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A legally binding prenup requires the wife to be represented by counsel, who will tell her not to sign anything stupid like giving up all alimony.

I’m a big fan of pre-nups (think almost everyone should have them) but you don’t seem to understand the basics of a pre-nup.

I have one and am very familiar. I know all about both parties needing to disclose assets and have counsel for it to be legally enforceable.

So then you know competent counsel doesn’t let their clients waive alimony unless there are offsets. There’s no prenup of “completely impoverish her as soon as you’re done screwing her” that a court won’t throw out.

Attorney’s will advise. In Maryland an alimony waiver will be enforced unless the spouse is likely to be a public charge. Please look up the case law on Google Scholar.

What’s the point of marring a rich guy with a prenup you describe ? She will be better off on herself . A smart young woman won’t sign it and will move on ; the guy will be left with his pick of not very smart baristas

Why all the sneering at baristas?

I think that barista is code for “woman who is attractive, but not well educated or ambitious.”
I think she is a barista because she is based on Rachel from the first season of Friends.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rich can be boring, arrogant, short tempered, disloyal, alcoholic, mentally burdened etc. Just money isn't enough if you are looking for a life long partnership in life and parenting.

Rich men are also profound cheaters and these marriages to SAHM don’t last in 50% cases. Women shouldn’t full themselves: free cheese is only in the mouse trap

Isn’t the divorce rate close to 50% for everyone?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A legally binding prenup requires the wife to be represented by counsel, who will tell her not to sign anything stupid like giving up all alimony.

I’m a big fan of pre-nups (think almost everyone should have them) but you don’t seem to understand the basics of a pre-nup.

I have one and am very familiar. I know all about both parties needing to disclose assets and have counsel for it to be legally enforceable.

So then you know competent counsel doesn’t let their clients waive alimony unless there are offsets. There’s no prenup of “completely impoverish her as soon as you’re done screwing her” that a court won’t throw out.

Attorney’s will advise. In Maryland an alimony waiver will be enforced unless the spouse is likely to be a public charge. Please look up the case law on Google Scholar.

What’s the point of marring a rich guy with a prenup you describe ? She will be better off on herself . A smart young woman won’t sign it and will move on ; the guy will be left with his pick of not very smart baristas

Why all the sneering at baristas?

Anonymous wrote:Rich can be boring, arrogant, short tempered, disloyal, alcoholic, mentally burdened etc. Just money isn't enough if you are looking for a life long partnership in life and parenting.

Rich men are also profound cheaters and these marriages to SAHM don’t last in 50% cases. Women shouldn’t full themselves: free cheese is only in the mouse trap

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A legally binding prenup requires the wife to be represented by counsel, who will tell her not to sign anything stupid like giving up all alimony.

I’m a big fan of pre-nups (think almost everyone should have them) but you don’t seem to understand the basics of a pre-nup.

I have one and am very familiar. I know all about both parties needing to disclose assets and have counsel for it to be legally enforceable.

So then you know competent counsel doesn’t let their clients waive alimony unless there are offsets. There’s no prenup of “completely impoverish her as soon as you’re done screwing her” that a court won’t throw out.

Attorney’s will advise. In Maryland an alimony waiver will be enforced unless the spouse is likely to be a public charge. Please look up the case law on Google Scholar.

What’s the point of marring a rich guy with a prenup you describe ? She will be better off on herself . A smart young woman won’t sign it and will move on ; the guy will be left with his pick of not very smart baristas

Anonymous wrote:Intelligent, healthy, centered, kind, educated, employed, loyal, debt free, interesting men make good partners and good fathers, no matter if they are rich or not.

aka rich, by most American standards. College/ grad school educated , with a job, and zero debt? That's rich.

Rich can be boring, arrogant, short tempered, disloyal, alcoholic, mentally burdened etc. Just money isn't enough if you are looking for a life long partnership in life and parenting.

Intelligent, healthy, centered, kind, educated, employed, loyal, debt free, interesting men make good partners and good fathers, no matter if they are rich or not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Independently wealthy women also don’t suffer a lack of male company and attention, but other women don’t get bent out of shape about that and post about it trying to make men look bad and shallow.

Fat, ugly old men who show up at events with gorgeous twenty-somethings don't need posters on DCUM to make them look bad and shallow.

True I just mean the people mad that women prefer rich men are…poor men. Poor women don’t get nearly so bent out of shape that care rich women get a lot of attention from men.

Rich women do not get attention form men.

You’re dreaming. Rich women get tons of attention from men. Independently wealthy women have whatever partners they want and women with family money are actively pursued for dating/marriage both by other wealthy men and by those with aspirations. People just don’t get as mad about it when a man marries his bosses daughter.