Anonymous wrote:I'm not necessarily jealous of the school, but the family support that helped most get into a top college.
I managed to get into a T20 all on my own only to have my father tell me that he didn't support women attending college. He considered it a waste of money because "you're just going to end up a SAHM and I need to save my money for your brother." I got zero aid because we were upper middle class and my merit scholarship wasn't enough at the T20. I ended up at a forth tier school on a full ride, working three jobs for incidentals loke car insurance, groceries and books, because my father cut me off. I couldn't even afford the state school.
I made up for my humble undergrad with much more prestigious grad schools, but the whole thing still stings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, knowing how a big percentage gets in on different quotas or by using their money, connections etc., it makes one question eligibility of every applicant. Even for everyone who gets in on merit, there are 10 equally or more eligible who doesn't get accepted because admission officers have personal biases which play for for against every applicant.
Totally agree. So many kids get into these schools are legacy admits or have some other connection to the school. I know this personally in my own family. The kids in my family who were admitted did well in school but were not the superstar kids that you would expect. It is not a merit system. That is why with my own DD, I do not care what she does or what college she goes to (thought she does have legacy to an ivy through her father). I wish that kids and parents were better aware of the system, so that they wouldn't be so disappointed or think that they were not "good enough." They are plenty good enough; they just weren't lucky enough to be born into a networked family.
There have been studies that show that the college that one attends does not have an impact on success or income 10 years out of college (except for the underprivileged where the connections of a good school give a boost). Elite schools are in place to help elites maintain their privilege.
Anonymous wrote:Well, knowing how a big percentage gets in on different quotas or by using their money, connections etc., it makes one question eligibility of every applicant. Even for everyone who gets in on merit, there are 10 equally or more eligible who doesn't get accepted because admission officers have personal biases which play for for against every applicant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. quite the opposite. I usually go ‘huh, and yet you’re in the same company, a similar role, in the same room as me.’
It's one thing to say I wasn't smart to get into an elite school; another to say I don't give a hoot about elite schools. It's a sign of insecurity - or low class.
I wouldn't go quite that far, but all the people in this thread very enthusiastically proclaiming that they don't care about elite schools at all and that they suck, etc. etc. -- it does come across to me as insecurity more than anything else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. quite the opposite. I usually go ‘huh, and yet you’re in the same company, a similar role, in the same room as me.’
It's one thing to say I wasn't smart to get into an elite school; another to say I don't give a hoot about elite schools. It's a sign of insecurity - or low class.
Anonymous wrote:No. quite the opposite. I usually go ‘huh, and yet you’re in the same company, a similar role, in the same room as me.’
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why only private schools? I’m jealous of people with degrees from places like UCLA and Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech is nothing to be jealous of...