Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And yet… NO ONE IN CALIFORNIA CARES about this released list! Even our Fox affiliates aren’t covering it. No one here cares. Release the list or CCP holders; don’t release the list of CCP holders.

We. Do. Not. Care.

Somebody cares. A law suit has been filed.

Anonymous wrote:And yet… NO ONE IN CALIFORNIA CARES about this released list! Even our Fox affiliates aren’t covering it. No one here cares. Release the list or CCP holders; don’t release the list of CCP holders.

We. Do. Not. Care.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Doubt this list will make any difference one way or another. Lots of people who are not CCW have guns at home. Lots.

It was unauthorized and not public information. So, yes... it makes a difference.

And, it was much larger than initially reported.

The California Department of Justice on Wednesday acknowledged the agency wrongly made public the personal information of perhaps hundreds of thousands of gun owners in up to six state-operated databases, a broader exposure than the agency initially disclosed a day earlier.

Rob Bonta, the Democrat who heads the agency and is running for reelection in November, said he was “deeply disturbed and angered” by the failure to protect the information his department is entrusted to keep. He ordered an investigation and promised to fix any problems.

“This unauthorized release of personal information is unacceptable and falls far short of my expectations for this department,” he said.

The California Rifle and Pistol Association noted that the release came days after the U.S. Supreme Court threw out New York’s requirement that those seeking to carry concealed weapons provide a reason. That also derailed California’s similar requirement, though state lawmakers and Bonta are working to impose new requirements.

The association said the “unconscionable” release included information on law enforcement officials including judges, as well as others who had sought permits “like rape and domestic violence victims.”

Names, dates of birth, gender, race, driver’s license numbers, addresses and criminal histories were exposed for people who were granted or denied permits to carry concealed weapons between 2011 and 2021, the department said.

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/california/personal-info-on-california-gun-owners-wrongly-made-public/2932963/

“It is infuriating that people who have been complying with the law have been put at risk by this breach,” said the Butte county sheriff, Kory Honea, the president of the California State Sheriffs’ Association, adding that sheriffs were concerned about potential risks to permit holders.

Advertisement

Bonta pledged to “take strong corrective measures where necessary” in response to the exposure.

“The California department of justice is entrusted to protect Californians and their data. We acknowledge the stress this may cause those individuals whose information was exposed,” Bonta said.

The department plans to notify those affected by the breach, he said, and provide credit monitoring services.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/30/california-gun-owners-data-breach

The state should post this information on their website with addresses. Also copy the police so they know to go in with weapons hot to these addresses.

Yep. The Floyd County KY killing of 3 officers should make that abundantly clear.

https://foxlexington.com/news/kentucky/man-arrested-in-floyd-co-shooting-charged-with-multiple-counts-of-murder/

I’m sure the killer followed all laws

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Doubt this list will make any difference one way or another. Lots of people who are not CCW have guns at home. Lots.

It was unauthorized and not public information. So, yes... it makes a difference.

And, it was much larger than initially reported.

The California Department of Justice on Wednesday acknowledged the agency wrongly made public the personal information of perhaps hundreds of thousands of gun owners in up to six state-operated databases, a broader exposure than the agency initially disclosed a day earlier.

Rob Bonta, the Democrat who heads the agency and is running for reelection in November, said he was “deeply disturbed and angered” by the failure to protect the information his department is entrusted to keep. He ordered an investigation and promised to fix any problems.

“This unauthorized release of personal information is unacceptable and falls far short of my expectations for this department,” he said.

The California Rifle and Pistol Association noted that the release came days after the U.S. Supreme Court threw out New York’s requirement that those seeking to carry concealed weapons provide a reason. That also derailed California’s similar requirement, though state lawmakers and Bonta are working to impose new requirements.

The association said the “unconscionable” release included information on law enforcement officials including judges, as well as others who had sought permits “like rape and domestic violence victims.”

Names, dates of birth, gender, race, driver’s license numbers, addresses and criminal histories were exposed for people who were granted or denied permits to carry concealed weapons between 2011 and 2021, the department said.

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/california/personal-info-on-california-gun-owners-wrongly-made-public/2932963/

“It is infuriating that people who have been complying with the law have been put at risk by this breach,” said the Butte county sheriff, Kory Honea, the president of the California State Sheriffs’ Association, adding that sheriffs were concerned about potential risks to permit holders.

Advertisement

Bonta pledged to “take strong corrective measures where necessary” in response to the exposure.

“The California department of justice is entrusted to protect Californians and their data. We acknowledge the stress this may cause those individuals whose information was exposed,” Bonta said.

The department plans to notify those affected by the breach, he said, and provide credit monitoring services.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/30/california-gun-owners-data-breach

The state should post this information on their website with addresses. Also copy the police so they know to go in with weapons hot to these addresses.

Yep. The Floyd County KY killing of 3 officers should make that abundantly clear.

https://foxlexington.com/news/kentucky/man-arrested-in-floyd-co-shooting-charged-with-multiple-counts-of-murder/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me, CCP has to do with China.

No one in China can defend themselves though. Because China.

Anonymous wrote:To me, CCP has to do with China.

Anonymous wrote:To me, CCP has to do with China.

Anonymous wrote:To me, CCP has to do with China.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Doubt this list will make any difference one way or another. Lots of people who are not CCW have guns at home. Lots.

It was unauthorized and not public information. So, yes... it makes a difference.

And, it was much larger than initially reported.

The California Department of Justice on Wednesday acknowledged the agency wrongly made public the personal information of perhaps hundreds of thousands of gun owners in up to six state-operated databases, a broader exposure than the agency initially disclosed a day earlier.

Rob Bonta, the Democrat who heads the agency and is running for reelection in November, said he was “deeply disturbed and angered” by the failure to protect the information his department is entrusted to keep. He ordered an investigation and promised to fix any problems.

“This unauthorized release of personal information is unacceptable and falls far short of my expectations for this department,” he said.

The California Rifle and Pistol Association noted that the release came days after the U.S. Supreme Court threw out New York’s requirement that those seeking to carry concealed weapons provide a reason. That also derailed California’s similar requirement, though state lawmakers and Bonta are working to impose new requirements.

The association said the “unconscionable” release included information on law enforcement officials including judges, as well as others who had sought permits “like rape and domestic violence victims.”

Names, dates of birth, gender, race, driver’s license numbers, addresses and criminal histories were exposed for people who were granted or denied permits to carry concealed weapons between 2011 and 2021, the department said.

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/california/personal-info-on-california-gun-owners-wrongly-made-public/2932963/

“It is infuriating that people who have been complying with the law have been put at risk by this breach,” said the Butte county sheriff, Kory Honea, the president of the California State Sheriffs’ Association, adding that sheriffs were concerned about potential risks to permit holders.

Advertisement

Bonta pledged to “take strong corrective measures where necessary” in response to the exposure.

“The California department of justice is entrusted to protect Californians and their data. We acknowledge the stress this may cause those individuals whose information was exposed,” Bonta said.

The department plans to notify those affected by the breach, he said, and provide credit monitoring services.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/30/california-gun-owners-data-breach

The state should post this information on their website with addresses. Also copy the police so they know to go in with weapons hot to these addresses.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do you have the right to privacy while carrying a gun but a woman does not have any right to privacy while carrying a pregnancy?

This is what is most astounding. The right wing is up in arms over the privacy of gun owners being breached but doesn't give a damn about womens' privacy being breached.

When a list of women who have had abortions, along with their addresses, phone numbers, criminal histories, driver's license number and other identifying information, we can chat.