Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go develop MoCo and PG. You need to, since my streets here in DC are 75% MD license plates and y'all Marylanders are here in my city griping about YOUR OWN traffic here and don't want to let those of us who ACTUALLY LIVE HERE ride our bikes and scooters to work.

Build in your own county. Build office space near where YOU live so that you don't have to drive, so that you can walk or bike or scooter to work the way many of us here in DC do.

Uh, huh. We all know you just don't want to live in a majority black neighborhood.

WTF kind of idiot comment is that? You don't know anything about me. I already LIVE in a majority black neighborhood, and enjoy it very much thank you. Now how about you stick to the topic of why you think all development has to be in DC and none anywhere else?

We're just asking you to do your fair share. But I suppose that's just too much for you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go develop MoCo and PG. You need to, since my streets here in DC are 75% MD license plates and y'all Marylanders are here in my city griping about YOUR OWN traffic here and don't want to let those of us who ACTUALLY LIVE HERE ride our bikes and scooters to work.

Build in your own county. Build office space near where YOU live so that you don't have to drive, so that you can walk or bike or scooter to work the way many of us here in DC do.

Uh, huh. We all know you just don't want to live in a majority black neighborhood.

WTF kind of idiot comment is that? You don't know anything about me. I already LIVE in a majority black neighborhood, and enjoy it very much thank you. Now how about you stick to the topic of why you think all development has to be in DC and none anywhere else?

Sure, Jan. Young white dudes' weird obsession with zoning laws totally does not reek of racism. Not at all. No sireee.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go develop MoCo and PG. You need to, since my streets here in DC are 75% MD license plates and y'all Marylanders are here in my city griping about YOUR OWN traffic here and don't want to let those of us who ACTUALLY LIVE HERE ride our bikes and scooters to work.

Build in your own county. Build office space near where YOU live so that you don't have to drive, so that you can walk or bike or scooter to work the way many of us here in DC do.

Uh, huh. We all know you just don't want to live in a majority black neighborhood.

WTF kind of idiot comment is that? You don't know anything about me. I already LIVE in a majority black neighborhood, and enjoy it very much thank you. Now how about you stick to the topic of why you think all development has to be in DC and none anywhere else?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have a housing emergency. There should be nothing off the table.

Its a simple solution, just move out. Everybody doesn't need to live in the DMV.

No. Poor people need a place to live here, too.

The choice is simple: Should we put a roof over a poor person's head or keep subsidizing rich white bros racing around on their mountain bikes?

Why not just raze Anacostia, build 15 huge apartment buildings- a la Cabrini Greens- and put all the brown poors there?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DC is concerned about housing and not having enough, why isn't' the city developing Rock Creek Park? I'm not saying build over the entire thing, but take a sizeable chunk of it and build affordable housing.

It’s a nation park. Like most national parks it was undesirable land to develop. You want more housing …build up. All you have to do is remove the height limits in DC.

Could even just remove or lighten height limits outside of the downtown/federal core.

While it is currently illegal to build taller than the Washington Monument, there is nothing illegal about converting Federal land to housing.

Actually, it is illegal to convert National Park land to housing (unless it’s for National Park Service personnel).

Anonymous wrote:Go develop MoCo and PG. You need to, since my streets here in DC are 75% MD license plates and y'all Marylanders are here in my city griping about YOUR OWN traffic here and don't want to let those of us who ACTUALLY LIVE HERE ride our bikes and scooters to work.

Build in your own county. Build office space near where YOU live so that you don't have to drive, so that you can walk or bike or scooter to work the way many of us here in DC do.

Uh, huh. We all know you just don't want to live in a majority black neighborhood.

Go develop MoCo and PG. You need to, since my streets here in DC are 75% MD license plates and y'all Marylanders are here in my city griping about YOUR OWN traffic here and don't want to let those of us who ACTUALLY LIVE HERE ride our bikes and scooters to work.

Build in your own county. Build office space near where YOU live so that you don't have to drive, so that you can walk or bike or scooter to work the way many of us here in DC do.

Tons of affordable housing in PG county. You can buy a house for $350,000 a couple blocks from the border with D.C. Go live there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was in RCP this morning and it’s completely flooded. The parts not flooded are steep ravines. That’s why it couldn’t be developed I even if you wanted to.

Oregon Avenue at Military Road, across the street from St John’s College HS is an open grass field on high ground and flat land. Perfect for development.

No. It’s perfect for recreation. Try your “Trump Growth” flackery somewhere else.

There is no “recreation” happening there, you can see for yourself. Stop being silly.

https://goo.gl/maps/f6A1uGfuAKJJrAew8

Every time an American sets foot in one of our National Parks, there is recreation happening.

Sure. But there is no way to “set foot” into these open, grass areas. So it’s just wasted space that should be better utilized.

Wasted? Just because you are blind to the wildlife doesn't mean the habitat isn't important. And while you are somewhere else whining about not having enough concrete to enjoy, birders, naturalist, children, hikers are all enjoying these spaces.

Anonymous wrote:We have a housing emergency. There should be nothing off the table.

Its a simple solution, just move out. Everybody doesn't need to live in the DMV.

We've added many thousands of units and 32,000 more residents to Ward 6 in the last 10 years yet it hasn't gotten a damn bit cheaper. More development DOES NOT MEAN more affordable. I think some of these delusional Smart Growth / GGWash idiots need to wake up and realize that even if we get 100,000 more units it still won't make whatever fantasy of them having an affordable highrise condo with a view for $1000 a month to fit whatever salary they are eking out on as a failed planner or architect who writes blog posts instead of doing anything useful.

Anonymous wrote:We have a housing emergency. There should be nothing off the table.

No we don’t. Not everyone has to live within the Washington DC limits. Much more affordable housing in PG and other jusisdictions. Just because you can’t afford U St it Karlorama doesn’t a “housing emergency” make. LOL.

We have a housing emergency. There should be nothing off the table.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DC is concerned about housing and not having enough, why isn't' the city developing Rock Creek Park? I'm not saying build over the entire thing, but take a sizeable chunk of it and build affordable housing.

It would be better to tear down all the SFH housing in NW and turn them into rowhouses.

^^^ THIS ^^^

Best idea of the whole thread.

Nah. I think we raise your rent to levels in ward 3 new Wegmans area instead. The destruction of SFH will never happen. But keep harping on it instead of thinking of viable options for you to buy a home. It will work out.

Wait!?! The Wegmans/City Ridge development is not affordable homes? Dang! The Smart Growthers promised that density = affordability.

+1. Additional fees for children too. $$$.