Anonymous wrote:She’s literally trying to use her wedding buzz to get into Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition. Dream big. NY Post has more pics of her face, she looks 45 years old.

https://nypost.com/2022/06/10/brooks-koepkas-wife-jena-sims-trying-out-for-si-swimsuit/amp/

She has gorgeous legs, that is irrefutable. Ouch, on the last photo seated in sequin top. Sunken in chest with implants, hair color wrong, skin color unnatural. His bleached clump of hair makes him look like a dim bulb. It is wrong but enjoyable to critique famous and fame-adjacent women. I hope they will be happy.

She’s literally trying to use her wedding buzz to get into Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition. Dream big. NY Post has more pics of her face, she looks 45 years old.

https://nypost.com/2022/06/10/brooks-koepkas-wife-jena-sims-trying-out-for-si-swimsuit/amp/

None of the dresses on this thread - except the literal vulva dress - looks very good (and the vulva dress just looks good on the grounds that it’s clearly an art dress and took a dang lot of time. Fabric art is tricky).

I don’t use the word “trashy” because I don’t like that word but I guess I don’t like the nexus of (cheap) lingerie and wedding dresses with a side of sequins. So much money and these dresses look, as a pp pointed out, like something someone bought off Amazon for $80. But then I’m 41 and the whole Instagram/super tan/spackle level makeup/blonde beach waves falling just so ethos leaves me cold.

I like it. It would be inappropriate in a church, but they are at the beach. She looks amazing. The only aspect of the dress I don’t like is the sparkle thing around her neck.

If I had legs like that I’d show them off to. Wow, amazing legs!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You want worse? Try this:

https://tomandlorenzo.com/2022/04/galia-lahav-spring-2023-bridal-couture-rise-collection-style-fashion-trends/

OMG hilarious.

I’m mystified about where your butt crack is supposed to be.

Anonymous wrote:OK, everybody who is willing to trash her wedding gown should now post a picture of their gown, along with their full name.

Put up or shut up.

I'd actually love to do this but I don't want anyone to know I post on this website. Super proud of my dress and would happily share, but deeply ashamed of my DCUM use and don't want evidence I do this.

Though I don't think I "trashed" her dress -- I just don't like the illusion netting. I think if you post photos of your wedding all over the internet, you probably anticipate some criticism. I doubt she cares what a bunch of anonymous people on a parenting website in DC think of her dress. I mean, come on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like it.

Mahomes stage 5 clinger had the ugliest wedding dress ever in history.

I agree, this is hideous.

This is just ill fitting.
Like what is going on?