Anonymous wrote:MTG’s ascension in the House is proof that the inmates are running the asylum!

Trump is of course considering her as a running mate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

That obviously shows that the GOP has absolutely NO principles left. Not even an illusion of any.

+1 Ladies and gentlemen, behold the member of House Homeland Security Committee who doesn’t think a plane hit the Pentagon.

She is a goddamn disgrace. I think maybe on one of the first meetings of the Homeland Security Committee, they should wait til she gets in, clear the room, lock the doors, then pull out all of the files and documents and photos and data, and spend the next 8 hours educating this complete moron on the TRUTH regarding all of the idiotic batshit conspiracy theories she spouts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

That obviously shows that the GOP has absolutely NO principles left. Not even an illusion of any.

+1 Ladies and gentlemen, behold the member of House Homeland Security Committee who doesn’t think a plane hit the Pentagon.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

That obviously shows that the GOP has absolutely NO principles left. Not even an illusion of any.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mahjoree Tayluh Greene,
She’s tough. One of the toughest.
Hates books. Hates gays.
She’s got it all.

They useta call that a buttaface.
Do they still say that? Buttaface?

Love you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

Anonymous wrote:"This Black Widow calls herself a 'strong conservative Christian,' who planned to take her 'family values' to Washington. In an undated video, Taylor Greene was seen dragging a cardboard cutout of Donald Trump on stage and then rubbing its crotch as she says how great he is"

https://lessonsinsidethelifestyle.com/naughty-congresswoman-marjorie-taylor-greene/

"I remember one particular pool party where she was lying draped over Craig's lap drinking a beer,"

https://www.nickiswift.com/618273/the-untold-truth-of-marjorie-taylor-greene/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He’s getting ahead of criminal charges and perhaps civil forfeiture against her. Divorce could allow her to transfer assets solely to him and perhaps beyond the reach of the federal government.

She’s been problematic for a loooooong time. He’s been perfectly OK with all her lunacy, the rhetoric, her cheating (I’m guessing they are swingers/hotwife).

These people only do things that will give themselves a benefit.

Where is there documentation of her cheating?