Anonymous wrote:I have a visceral reaction to so-called progressives who carp about little girls' costumes in an attempt to be "woke".
OP, you're just no fun.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone is a progressive until their son wants to wear a princess dress to daycare.
Eh, that's fine too. A bunch of boys did when my DD was in daycare (she was 4 when the first Frozen was HUGE). All the kids fought over who got to be Elsa.
Now they are 11 and the girls no longer dress like princesses, neither do the boys, (though they may be gay or lesbian, who knows) and they're all fine. This is just such a non-issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe that being fem negates being smart. I have my PhD in statistics, am working in my field, and love makeup and feeling ::gasp:: pretty. My daughter is 5 and loves princesses. She is also bilingual, obsessed with doing math and puzzles. So I guess, OP, you’re just not as open minded as you think you are.
and even if your daughter didn't like math or hated puzzles or was monolingual....THAT'S OK TOO! I get where people are going when they say stuff like this but I kind of hate when people feel the need to follow up their "my daughter likes princesses but she also likes [insert non-stereotypically feminine activity]" as if a girl needs to also like [insert non-stereotypically feminine activity] to be "ok" or to get those progressive points.
My daughter (now 22 and in her first year of graduate school to become a speech pathologist) loved princesses as a kid. She liked ballet. She had a learning disability in math. School never came easily for her- college was an uphill battle and grad school has been so far, too. She's always been interested in hair, makeup, fashion, and shopping (you should see the girl thrift!). She's shy and can be emotional and doesn't have a big personality. She's a natural with kids and loves to babysit (still!). Everything about her is a "girly girl." And that's 100% OK.
Anonymous wrote:+10 progressive points for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone is a progressive until their son wants to wear a princess dress to daycare.
I gifted a bunch dress up clothes to my daughter's daycare and all the boys would fight over wearing them. Nobody blinked an eye
Anonymous wrote:I don’t get why dinosaurs are strong and interesting but unicorns are weak and people judge little girls for them. This whole argument against little girls is sexist.
My dd loves anything with pink, sparkles or a tutu. She’s very extra and it fits her personality. Ds is into purple, dinosaurs and wears a hood everywhere he goes. He’s grumpier and doesn’t want attention.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I Believe it’s what’s being sold to them, OP. It’s more the Disney culture than anything. My mom was saying that in the 1950’s there were “hobos”, ghosts, Addams Family and Munsters characters but very few Cinderella’s because they only saw Cinderella once in the theater. My mom has great pictures of herself dressed as Paul McCartney and her siblings as John, George and Ringo. Once she went as cousin It.
I was not as Princess orientated as my DD is because I didn’t watch as much princess crap.
This is my gripe with Disney princesses, and Spiderman, or any other corporate/commercial character that's out there. Parents are the gatekeepers, kids don't have a biological need/desire to dress like a Disney princess or Batman, and posters who don't acknowledge this are annoying. Sure, your kid will grow out of it, but how did your kid grow into it?
OP is also very annoying.
If you have to ask such a stupid question then you obviously don't have kids. People like you and OP are annoying.
Wrong, but go ahead and hide behind the ol "you obviously don't have kids" thing if it makes you feel safe.
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why we have to shit on little girls for liking the things that they like
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why we have to shit on little girls for liking the things that they like
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone is a progressive until their son wants to wear a princess dress to daycare.
This. The conventional wisdom seems to be to push girls into sports and away from girly things on the thinking that this is progressive. But you don't see anyone pushing boys into anything perceived as girly. It's absurd. We don't have to put the thumb on the scale in either direction. We could just let our kids be whatever they are, whether that lines up with biology or not. There is a fair amount of scientific support for the fact that boys tend to be attracted to typically boy things (trucks, balls) and girl are attracted to typically girl things -- all before nurture has had its say. That's neither right nor wrong. Let the girls wear their tiaras or kick their soccer balls (or both!) as they prefer. And let the boys do the same!
Anonymous wrote:Everyone is a progressive until their son wants to wear a princess dress to daycare.