Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Welcome to the new social justice reality. I know it’s nice to dream and pretend we live in a utopia. When reality hits post graduation we’ll see how all these coddling policies pans out.
Ah, but don't you see that this is achieving equity by bringing down the "privileged" rather than fixing the problems and addressing the obstacles that keep the underprivileged from rising up? It's a much easier solution to the performance gaps!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Welcome to the new social justice reality. I know it’s nice to dream and pretend we live in a utopia. When reality hits post graduation we’ll see how all these coddling policies pans out.
Ah, but don't you see that this is achieving equity by bringing down the "privileged" rather than fixing the problems and addressing the obstacles that keep the underprivileged from rising up? It's a much easier solution to the performance gaps!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Welcome to the new social justice reality. I know it’s nice to dream and pretend we live in a utopia. When reality hits post graduation we’ll see how all these coddling policies pans out.
Ah, but don't you see that this is achieving equity by bringing down the "privileged" rather than fixing the problems and addressing the obstacles that keep the underprivileged from rising up? It's a much easier solution to the performance gaps!
Anonymous wrote:Welcome to the new social justice reality. I know it’s nice to dream and pretend we live in a utopia. When reality hits post graduation we’ll see how all these coddling policies pans out.
Anonymous wrote:Standards based grading is fine for elementary school kids but c’mon — middle school and high school kids need grades to help them get ready for college. I agree with a PP who said that APS is racing toward the bottom and that it’s driving families who can afford to send kids to private to do that. It is creating more inequity. Who is driving this insanity?
Anonymous wrote:I get the extra credit stuff. But a 50% for an assignment you never even did? No way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Standards based grading is fine for elementary school kids but c’mon — middle school and high school kids need grades to help them get ready for college. I agree with a PP who said that APS is racing toward the bottom and that it’s driving families who can afford to send kids to private to do that. It is creating more inequity. Who is driving this insanity?
I don’t think it’s a mystery who is behind these changes.
Anonymous wrote:Standards based grading is fine for elementary school kids but c’mon — middle school and high school kids need grades to help them get ready for college. I agree with a PP who said that APS is racing toward the bottom and that it’s driving families who can afford to send kids to private to do that. It is creating more inequity. Who is driving this insanity?
Anonymous wrote:A SB member pulled for private because of this?? I didn’t know that. Is that true?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here we go again…competing parents groups will be formed, accusations will be made, petitions will be circulated, “economists” will be consulted, votes will be postponed, etc. On and on it goes.
It's the Arlington Way.
Doubt there will be a competing group. Arlington is full of parents who busted ass to get here and they are going to be pretty skeptical of this approach, which essentially says they did it wrong.
Arlington is also full of wealthy progressive parents who will not want to publicly oppose this. Behind the scenes, some will express concern. Others won’t care.
Well, I sure as hell hope the SB who pulled his kid to private FOR THIS REASOn publicly opposes it rather than just b****ing about it on the soccer sidelines and making things okay for his own.
SBG for ES makes sense, as long as teachers are trained on how to implement it and there are very clear and consistent rules across APS. And yes, there needs to be more standardization across APS, even within schools, but that can be accomplished without SBG. This is another “balanced literacy” moment. Stop experimenting on our kids, you godd*** monsters! SBG at the secondary level will just mask inequality, while it grows, rather than addressing the root causes, and will NOT prepare kids for the world beyond APS, where they will be measured by both their effort and the end result.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The elimination of extra credit. That must be designed to say, no more freebies for wealthy/UMC families who have the time and resources to complete those projects. On this point, I applaud you, leaders of APS!
Little kids sure maybe that's true but once kids get to upper grades "extra credit" is meant to help kids who might fail because they have done nothing all year and this gives them a way to do something easier and get credit and pass. The kids who are already doing well won't bother as it won't really help them if they already have an A
I haven't read the book. What is the difference between allowing extra credit assignments vs. allowing kids multiple chances to take a test or complete an assignment late? They both seem like different ways a kid can make up for underperforming or just declining to do the work already given.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The elimination of extra credit. That must be designed to say, no more freebies for wealthy/UMC families who have the time and resources to complete those projects. On this point, I applaud you, leaders of APS!
Little kids sure maybe that's true but once kids get to upper grades "extra credit" is meant to help kids who might fail because they have done nothing all year and this gives them a way to do something easier and get credit and pass. The kids who are already doing well won't bother as it won't really help them if they already have an A