Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Given all the building going on near Cabin Branch and in the Clarksburg area, it won’t be half empty long, if ever.
Actually Clarksburg is approaching build-out.
Anonymous wrote:
Given all the building going on near Cabin Branch and in the Clarksburg area, it won’t be half empty long, if ever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, it's a possibility. My personal opinion of the likeliest outcome is for Clarksburg ES to go to Rocky Hill/Clarksburg and Cabin Branch ES to go to Neelsville/Seneca Valley. But I have been wrong before!
I agree with this prediction. The question is mainly which areas will be zoned to which.
It's actually called Clarksburg #9, not Cabin Branch ES at this point. I wouldn't be surprised if not all of Cabin Branch residents are assigned to the new school.
Yes, it's called Clarksburg ES #9 because that's how MCPS refers to not-yet-named schools, but it is the elementary school that MCPS is building in Cabin Branch.
All of Cabin Branch is assigned to Neelsville MS and Seneca Valley HS:
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/NeelsvilleMS.pdf
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/SenecaValleyHS.pdf
If some Cabin Branch students were sent to Clarksburg ES instead of the ES in Cabin Branch, that would create a gratuitous split articulation at Clarksburg ES, and I can't think of anybody who would benefit from that.
But maybe you're thinking of Pulte's proposed development on Ten Mile Creek, on the other side of Clarksburg Road from Cabin Branch? That is assigned to Rocky Hill MS/Clarksburg HS. However, students in that development wouldn't be in the walk zone for the ES in Cabin Branch anyway, at least not without a crossing guard.
I think it's safe to assume all of Cabin Branch will be assigned to the new school. Their goal is to get Clarksburg ES all the way down to below its capacity of 311, so we need to see just how small of an area would comprise ~300 ES students. Everyone else (projected to be 455 students overcapacity in 2023) would easily fit within the new school (capacity 721).
Don't assume it's safe. The planning department rep specifically said no one knows yet which kids will be attending the school. Besides, you have to remember, that they are not assigning students just based on geography. They are also looking at other factors, including demographics. I think the only thing that is safe to assume is that Clarksburg cluster elementary schools and Seneca Valley cluster elementary schools will be part of the study.
I still think the areas that were just reassigned to Neelsville/Seneca Valley are not going to be re-reassigned back to Rocky Hill/Clarksburg. That would go 100% against the stability factor as well as the demographics factor and the utilization factor.
I agree. That said, I think if they were to split Cabin Branch, it would most likely be that part of the neighborhood will attend the new Cabin Branch elementary school and the other part will be assigned to an existing school that already articulates to Neelsville/Seneca Valley- like Gibbs.
But then who else would be assigned to the new school? They'd leave it half-empty?
Anonymous wrote:From where? For what reason?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, it's a possibility. My personal opinion of the likeliest outcome is for Clarksburg ES to go to Rocky Hill/Clarksburg and Cabin Branch ES to go to Neelsville/Seneca Valley. But I have been wrong before!
I agree with this prediction. The question is mainly which areas will be zoned to which.
It's actually called Clarksburg #9, not Cabin Branch ES at this point. I wouldn't be surprised if not all of Cabin Branch residents are assigned to the new school.
Yes, it's called Clarksburg ES #9 because that's how MCPS refers to not-yet-named schools, but it is the elementary school that MCPS is building in Cabin Branch.
All of Cabin Branch is assigned to Neelsville MS and Seneca Valley HS:
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/NeelsvilleMS.pdf
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/SenecaValleyHS.pdf
If some Cabin Branch students were sent to Clarksburg ES instead of the ES in Cabin Branch, that would create a gratuitous split articulation at Clarksburg ES, and I can't think of anybody who would benefit from that.
But maybe you're thinking of Pulte's proposed development on Ten Mile Creek, on the other side of Clarksburg Road from Cabin Branch? That is assigned to Rocky Hill MS/Clarksburg HS. However, students in that development wouldn't be in the walk zone for the ES in Cabin Branch anyway, at least not without a crossing guard.
I think it's safe to assume all of Cabin Branch will be assigned to the new school. Their goal is to get Clarksburg ES all the way down to below its capacity of 311, so we need to see just how small of an area would comprise ~300 ES students. Everyone else (projected to be 455 students overcapacity in 2023) would easily fit within the new school (capacity 721).
Don't assume it's safe. The planning department rep specifically said no one knows yet which kids will be attending the school. Besides, you have to remember, that they are not assigning students just based on geography. They are also looking at other factors, including demographics. I think the only thing that is safe to assume is that Clarksburg cluster elementary schools and Seneca Valley cluster elementary schools will be part of the study.
I still think the areas that were just reassigned to Neelsville/Seneca Valley are not going to be re-reassigned back to Rocky Hill/Clarksburg. That would go 100% against the stability factor as well as the demographics factor and the utilization factor.
I agree. That said, I think if they were to split Cabin Branch, it would most likely be that part of the neighborhood will attend the new Cabin Branch elementary school and the other part will be assigned to an existing school that already articulates to Neelsville/Seneca Valley- like Gibbs.
But then who else would be assigned to the new school? They'd leave it half-empty?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, it's a possibility. My personal opinion of the likeliest outcome is for Clarksburg ES to go to Rocky Hill/Clarksburg and Cabin Branch ES to go to Neelsville/Seneca Valley. But I have been wrong before!
I agree with this prediction. The question is mainly which areas will be zoned to which.
It's actually called Clarksburg #9, not Cabin Branch ES at this point. I wouldn't be surprised if not all of Cabin Branch residents are assigned to the new school.
Yes, it's called Clarksburg ES #9 because that's how MCPS refers to not-yet-named schools, but it is the elementary school that MCPS is building in Cabin Branch.
All of Cabin Branch is assigned to Neelsville MS and Seneca Valley HS:
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/NeelsvilleMS.pdf
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/SenecaValleyHS.pdf
If some Cabin Branch students were sent to Clarksburg ES instead of the ES in Cabin Branch, that would create a gratuitous split articulation at Clarksburg ES, and I can't think of anybody who would benefit from that.
But maybe you're thinking of Pulte's proposed development on Ten Mile Creek, on the other side of Clarksburg Road from Cabin Branch? That is assigned to Rocky Hill MS/Clarksburg HS. However, students in that development wouldn't be in the walk zone for the ES in Cabin Branch anyway, at least not without a crossing guard.
I think it's safe to assume all of Cabin Branch will be assigned to the new school. Their goal is to get Clarksburg ES all the way down to below its capacity of 311, so we need to see just how small of an area would comprise ~300 ES students. Everyone else (projected to be 455 students overcapacity in 2023) would easily fit within the new school (capacity 721).
Don't assume it's safe. The planning department rep specifically said no one knows yet which kids will be attending the school. Besides, you have to remember, that they are not assigning students just based on geography. They are also looking at other factors, including demographics. I think the only thing that is safe to assume is that Clarksburg cluster elementary schools and Seneca Valley cluster elementary schools will be part of the study.
I still think the areas that were just reassigned to Neelsville/Seneca Valley are not going to be re-reassigned back to Rocky Hill/Clarksburg. That would go 100% against the stability factor as well as the demographics factor and the utilization factor.
I agree. That said, I think if they were to split Cabin Branch, it would most likely be that part of the neighborhood will attend the new Cabin Branch elementary school and the other part will be assigned to an existing school that already articulates to Neelsville/Seneca Valley- like Gibbs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, it's a possibility. My personal opinion of the likeliest outcome is for Clarksburg ES to go to Rocky Hill/Clarksburg and Cabin Branch ES to go to Neelsville/Seneca Valley. But I have been wrong before!
I agree with this prediction. The question is mainly which areas will be zoned to which.
It's actually called Clarksburg #9, not Cabin Branch ES at this point. I wouldn't be surprised if not all of Cabin Branch residents are assigned to the new school.
Yes, it's called Clarksburg ES #9 because that's how MCPS refers to not-yet-named schools, but it is the elementary school that MCPS is building in Cabin Branch.
All of Cabin Branch is assigned to Neelsville MS and Seneca Valley HS:
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/NeelsvilleMS.pdf
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/SenecaValleyHS.pdf
If some Cabin Branch students were sent to Clarksburg ES instead of the ES in Cabin Branch, that would create a gratuitous split articulation at Clarksburg ES, and I can't think of anybody who would benefit from that.
But maybe you're thinking of Pulte's proposed development on Ten Mile Creek, on the other side of Clarksburg Road from Cabin Branch? That is assigned to Rocky Hill MS/Clarksburg HS. However, students in that development wouldn't be in the walk zone for the ES in Cabin Branch anyway, at least not without a crossing guard.
I think it's safe to assume all of Cabin Branch will be assigned to the new school. Their goal is to get Clarksburg ES all the way down to below its capacity of 311, so we need to see just how small of an area would comprise ~300 ES students. Everyone else (projected to be 455 students overcapacity in 2023) would easily fit within the new school (capacity 721).
Don't assume it's safe. The planning department rep specifically said no one knows yet which kids will be attending the school. Besides, you have to remember, that they are not assigning students just based on geography. They are also looking at other factors, including demographics. I think the only thing that is safe to assume is that Clarksburg cluster elementary schools and Seneca Valley cluster elementary schools will be part of the study.
I still think the areas that were just reassigned to Neelsville/Seneca Valley are not going to be re-reassigned back to Rocky Hill/Clarksburg. That would go 100% against the stability factor as well as the demographics factor and the utilization factor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, it's a possibility. My personal opinion of the likeliest outcome is for Clarksburg ES to go to Rocky Hill/Clarksburg and Cabin Branch ES to go to Neelsville/Seneca Valley. But I have been wrong before!
I agree with this prediction. The question is mainly which areas will be zoned to which.
It's actually called Clarksburg #9, not Cabin Branch ES at this point. I wouldn't be surprised if not all of Cabin Branch residents are assigned to the new school.
Yes, it's called Clarksburg ES #9 because that's how MCPS refers to not-yet-named schools, but it is the elementary school that MCPS is building in Cabin Branch.
All of Cabin Branch is assigned to Neelsville MS and Seneca Valley HS:
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/NeelsvilleMS.pdf
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/SenecaValleyHS.pdf
If some Cabin Branch students were sent to Clarksburg ES instead of the ES in Cabin Branch, that would create a gratuitous split articulation at Clarksburg ES, and I can't think of anybody who would benefit from that.
But maybe you're thinking of Pulte's proposed development on Ten Mile Creek, on the other side of Clarksburg Road from Cabin Branch? That is assigned to Rocky Hill MS/Clarksburg HS. However, students in that development wouldn't be in the walk zone for the ES in Cabin Branch anyway, at least not without a crossing guard.
I think it's safe to assume all of Cabin Branch will be assigned to the new school. Their goal is to get Clarksburg ES all the way down to below its capacity of 311, so we need to see just how small of an area would comprise ~300 ES students. Everyone else (projected to be 455 students overcapacity in 2023) would easily fit within the new school (capacity 721).
Don't assume it's safe. The planning department rep specifically said no one knows yet which kids will be attending the school. Besides, you have to remember, that they are not assigning students just based on geography. They are also looking at other factors, including demographics. I think the only thing that is safe to assume is that Clarksburg cluster elementary schools and Seneca Valley cluster elementary schools will be part of the study.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, it's a possibility. My personal opinion of the likeliest outcome is for Clarksburg ES to go to Rocky Hill/Clarksburg and Cabin Branch ES to go to Neelsville/Seneca Valley. But I have been wrong before!
I agree with this prediction. The question is mainly which areas will be zoned to which.
It's actually called Clarksburg #9, not Cabin Branch ES at this point. I wouldn't be surprised if not all of Cabin Branch residents are assigned to the new school.
Yes, it's called Clarksburg ES #9 because that's how MCPS refers to not-yet-named schools, but it is the elementary school that MCPS is building in Cabin Branch.
All of Cabin Branch is assigned to Neelsville MS and Seneca Valley HS:
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/NeelsvilleMS.pdf
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/SenecaValleyHS.pdf
If some Cabin Branch students were sent to Clarksburg ES instead of the ES in Cabin Branch, that would create a gratuitous split articulation at Clarksburg ES, and I can't think of anybody who would benefit from that.
But maybe you're thinking of Pulte's proposed development on Ten Mile Creek, on the other side of Clarksburg Road from Cabin Branch? That is assigned to Rocky Hill MS/Clarksburg HS. However, students in that development wouldn't be in the walk zone for the ES in Cabin Branch anyway, at least not without a crossing guard.
I think it's safe to assume all of Cabin Branch will be assigned to the new school. Their goal is to get Clarksburg ES all the way down to below its capacity of 311, so we need to see just how small of an area would comprise ~300 ES students. Everyone else (projected to be 455 students overcapacity in 2023) would easily fit within the new school (capacity 721).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, it's a possibility. My personal opinion of the likeliest outcome is for Clarksburg ES to go to Rocky Hill/Clarksburg and Cabin Branch ES to go to Neelsville/Seneca Valley. But I have been wrong before!
I agree with this prediction. The question is mainly which areas will be zoned to which.
It's actually called Clarksburg #9, not Cabin Branch ES at this point. I wouldn't be surprised if not all of Cabin Branch residents are assigned to the new school.
Yes, it's called Clarksburg ES #9 because that's how MCPS refers to not-yet-named schools, but it is the elementary school that MCPS is building in Cabin Branch.
All of Cabin Branch is assigned to Neelsville MS and Seneca Valley HS:
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/NeelsvilleMS.pdf
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/SenecaValleyHS.pdf
If some Cabin Branch students were sent to Clarksburg ES instead of the ES in Cabin Branch, that would create a gratuitous split articulation at Clarksburg ES, and I can't think of anybody who would benefit from that.
But maybe you're thinking of Pulte's proposed development on Ten Mile Creek, on the other side of Clarksburg Road from Cabin Branch? That is assigned to Rocky Hill MS/Clarksburg HS. However, students in that development wouldn't be in the walk zone for the ES in Cabin Branch anyway, at least not without a crossing guard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, it's a possibility. My personal opinion of the likeliest outcome is for Clarksburg ES to go to Rocky Hill/Clarksburg and Cabin Branch ES to go to Neelsville/Seneca Valley. But I have been wrong before!
I agree with this prediction. The question is mainly which areas will be zoned to which.
It's actually called Clarksburg #9, not Cabin Branch ES at this point. I wouldn't be surprised if not all of Cabin Branch residents are assigned to the new school.
Yes, it's called Clarksburg ES #9 because that's how MCPS refers to not-yet-named schools, but it is the elementary school that MCPS is building in Cabin Branch.
All of Cabin Branch is assigned to Neelsville MS and Seneca Valley HS:
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/NeelsvilleMS.pdf
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/SenecaValleyHS.pdf
If some Cabin Branch students were sent to Clarksburg ES instead of the ES in Cabin Branch, that would create a gratuitous split articulation at Clarksburg ES, and I can't think of anybody who would benefit from that.
But maybe you're thinking of Pulte's proposed development on Ten Mile Creek, on the other side of Clarksburg Road from Cabin Branch? That is assigned to Rocky Hill MS/Clarksburg HS. However, students in that development wouldn't be in the walk zone for the ES in Cabin Branch anyway, at least not without a crossing guard.