Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 5' 1" fully grown daughter will run outrun any player on opposing (and her own) team in any position. Her speed serves her well. She always starts and plays most of the game. She is a top scorer as a forward, but can play defense as backup any day. Lots of tall lanky girls on the team that move in slow motion by comparison. Fun to watch.
She can't outrun my 6'4" daughter who is still growing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know if its been mentioned but I am sure our team is not unique. Our shortest players are our top players and don't get benched. They get around larger players easily until those larger players start fouling, then its up to the ref how the game will go.
Larger players fouling? This thread is so cliche. Most hits from a big to a small player are assumed to be fouls by inexperiencedr refs. Especially after the small player rolls over 3 times to get the foul.. my very tall/ big son never has a foul called in his favor, regardless of how hard he is pushed or kicked because he's able to take the hit and keep playing while smaller kids fall.
Saw a short player being favored by the ref many times, it was a home game for this player. It was as the ref was a close friend or players relative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 5' 1" fully grown daughter will run outrun any player on opposing (and her own) team in any position. Her speed serves her well. She always starts and plays most of the game. She is a top scorer as a forward, but can play defense as backup any day. Lots of tall lanky girls on the team that move in slow motion by comparison. Fun to watch.
She can't outrun my 6'4" daughter who is still growing.
She does not need to outrun your daughter. She is probably a helluva lot more agile and quick than a lumbering 6’4” girl and will throw a tall player off balance in a heartbeat if skilled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 5' 1" fully grown daughter will run outrun any player on opposing (and her own) team in any position. Her speed serves her well. She always starts and plays most of the game. She is a top scorer as a forward, but can play defense as backup any day. Lots of tall lanky girls on the team that move in slow motion by comparison. Fun to watch.
She can't outrun my 6'4" daughter who is still growing.
She does not need to outrun your daughter. She is probably a helluva lot more agile and quick than a lumbering 6’4” girl and will throw a tall player off balance in a heartbeat if skilled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 5' 1" fully grown daughter will run outrun any player on opposing (and her own) team in any position. Her speed serves her well. She always starts and plays most of the game. She is a top scorer as a forward, but can play defense as backup any day. Lots of tall lanky girls on the team that move in slow motion by comparison. Fun to watch.
She can't outrun my 6'4" daughter who is still growing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 5' 1" fully grown daughter will run outrun any player on opposing (and her own) team in any position. Her speed serves her well. She always starts and plays most of the game. She is a top scorer as a forward, but can play defense as backup any day. Lots of tall lanky girls on the team that move in slow motion by comparison. Fun to watch.
She can't outrun my 6'4" daughter who is still growing.
Anonymous wrote:My 5' 1" fully grown daughter will run outrun any player on opposing (and her own) team in any position. Her speed serves her well. She always starts and plays most of the game. She is a top scorer as a forward, but can play defense as backup any day. Lots of tall lanky girls on the team that move in slow motion by comparison. Fun to watch.
Anonymous wrote:If the technical skills were equal and you have your choice a 5'7" kid or a 6'1" kid who are you taking and why? Im interested to hear the philosophy from each side on whether would choose.
Anonymous wrote:The best players are neither tall nor short. They are average. Just thought I’d throw a third option in the heretofore binary argument. 🤪
Anonymous wrote:All theses are stupid comments, if the player short or tall has been doing soccer since age 5 or younger and they have the skill set then what sets them apart is ability/IQ/speed. Who would you brig to your team Messi or Ronaldo? Well where is the gap in my team? Do I need a tall player to defend/attack teams that play kickball? A short one to dribble in tight spaces spaces? Who has the quals to fill the gap?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most pro soccer players from all over the world are elite athletes. Almost all travel soccer players from the USA are not elite athletes. So whether your kid is tall or short technically gifted or not. If he's not and elite athlete he's not even in the conversation.
My kid was running a sub-6 minute mile at age 10. Is that an elite athlete? What is an elite athlete? You don't need a 45 inch vertical jump to play soccer well.
Your son was not an elite athlete because he could run fast.
Oh, it's the lineman who weighs 450 lbs. and can just push a guy 5 yards, right? Idiotic American thinking. Running super fast does not make an athlete, but you know an athlete when you see one. And athleticism alone does not make a great soccer player. Bruce Jenner was a great athlete. Need I say more?