Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Women are weaker and she was far smaller. She didn’t force him anywhere.

He was holding onto her in a very controlling way, not just supporting or affectionate.

Was his shirt torn? How did he get the scratches? Did his missing shirt or shoes have blood on them?

His whole town is the size of a large HS. People who know him will know if he is an angry drunk, disrespects girls or is some gentle giant type.

Typical DCUM, always looking to blame the man, to the point of trying to see if he was an "angry drunk".

The beach and waves there were treacherous. It was 4am and dark. She was drunk. Perhaps she... drowned in such dangerous conditions?

Disgusting to imply this man did anything to her. Everyone in this situation used bad judgement.

The man last seen with a missing woman is always a key suspect and often her killer. Our only proof she went in the water is his, and he changed his story several times.

Authorities this morning said they are not looking at this case as a criminal matter.

They are holding the guy’s passport and he’s being monitored in a hotel room by LE. Word games.

= DR protecting its resorts

Exactly. This poor guy. Also, who cares if he played football?

Please.

Everybody knows these jocks / sports-type (football, lacrosse), are far more likely to engage in date-rape and sexual assaults.

Believe women!

/s

no woman has made any accusation (except this thread's YOU pp). the woman the subject of this thread was seen drinking at a bar for hours and walking arm-in-arm with new guy toward the red flag beach and she ditched her friends and phone

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its so incredibly obvious that she drowned, drunk. It's the only logical explanation. I don't understand the finger pointing at the other drunk kids. Yes, they were on spring break. Kids do dumb sh!t on spring break. I also did incredibly stupid stuff in Daytona Beach in 1996. Most people get lucky, she didn't.

It's predominantly one YOU pp who must be part of the family community in some way but absolutely refuses to accept this "logical" explanation, even as a possibility. It's beyond comprehension to her that the victim here may have made some unwise decisions (or that she drank alcohol or may have been drunk). So she continuously attempts to divert the thread with conspiracy theories, mostly naming and pointing to the guy. The other group are true crime junkies.

Investigators have named him a POI. Why are you so hysterically trying to obfuscate that fact?

Investigators clearly stated today (Thursday) that a POI is an American term, not a DR term. They said NO ONE is being looked at criminally.

US LE is also involved.

you mean Barney Fife from Loudoun County?

Anonymous wrote:I would think a trained lifeguard would be that much more likely to raise an alarm if they saw someone disappear under a wave. Even drunk the training would kick in.

Unless he had something to hide.

If he killed her I hope he does not get away with it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its so incredibly obvious that she drowned, drunk. It's the only logical explanation. I don't understand the finger pointing at the other drunk kids. Yes, they were on spring break. Kids do dumb sh!t on spring break. I also did incredibly stupid stuff in Daytona Beach in 1996. Most people get lucky, she didn't.

It's predominantly one YOU pp who must be part of the family community in some way but absolutely refuses to accept this "logical" explanation, even as a possibility. It's beyond comprehension to her that the victim here may have made some unwise decisions (or that she drank alcohol or may have been drunk). So she continuously attempts to divert the thread with conspiracy theories, mostly naming and pointing to the guy. The other group are true crime junkies.

Don't give up your day job. No one has put any conspiracy theories if you read most of these posts. Nor has only one poster pointed to the guy. He is just one of a few possiblities to what may have happened. People have asked what about her friends too. Did they do something foul leading up to the early morning? Do YOU know?

the YOU pp, responsible for most of the mis-directions it this thread, almost all pointing/naming the guy. The couple others are true crime junkies.

YOU are wrong, name calling poster troll.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its so incredibly obvious that she drowned, drunk. It's the only logical explanation. I don't understand the finger pointing at the other drunk kids. Yes, they were on spring break. Kids do dumb sh!t on spring break. I also did incredibly stupid stuff in Daytona Beach in 1996. Most people get lucky, she didn't.

It's predominantly one YOU pp who must be part of the family community in some way but absolutely refuses to accept this "logical" explanation, even as a possibility. It's beyond comprehension to her that the victim here may have made some unwise decisions (or that she drank alcohol or may have been drunk). So she continuously attempts to divert the thread with conspiracy theories, mostly naming and pointing to the guy. The other group are true crime junkies.

Don't give up your day job. No one has put any conspiracy theories if you read most of these posts. Nor has only one poster pointed to the guy. He is just one of a few possiblities to what may have happened. People have asked what about her friends too. Did they do something foul leading up to the early morning? Do YOU know?

the YOU pp, responsible for most of the mis-directions it this thread, almost all pointing/naming the guy. The couple others are true crime junkies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Women are weaker and she was far smaller. She didn’t force him anywhere.

He was holding onto her in a very controlling way, not just supporting or affectionate.

Was his shirt torn? How did he get the scratches? Did his missing shirt or shoes have blood on them?

His whole town is the size of a large HS. People who know him will know if he is an angry drunk, disrespects girls or is some gentle giant type.

Typical DCUM, always looking to blame the man, to the point of trying to see if he was an "angry drunk".

The beach and waves there were treacherous. It was 4am and dark. She was drunk. Perhaps she... drowned in such dangerous conditions?

Disgusting to imply this man did anything to her. Everyone in this situation used bad judgement.

The man last seen with a missing woman is always a key suspect and often her killer. Our only proof she went in the water is his, and he changed his story several times.

Authorities this morning said they are not looking at this case as a criminal matter.

They are holding the guy’s passport and he’s being monitored in a hotel room by LE. Word games.

= DR protecting its resorts

Exactly. This poor guy. Also, who cares if he played football?

Please.

Everybody knows these jocks / sports-type (football, lacrosse), are far more likely to engage in date-rape and sexual assaults.

Believe women!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Women are weaker and she was far smaller. She didn’t force him anywhere.

He was holding onto her in a very controlling way, not just supporting or affectionate.

Was his shirt torn? How did he get the scratches? Did his missing shirt or shoes have blood on them?

His whole town is the size of a large HS. People who know him will know if he is an angry drunk, disrespects girls or is some gentle giant type.

Typical DCUM, always looking to blame the man, to the point of trying to see if he was an "angry drunk".

The beach and waves there were treacherous. It was 4am and dark. She was drunk. Perhaps she... drowned in such dangerous conditions?

Disgusting to imply this man did anything to her. Everyone in this situation used bad judgement.

The man last seen with a missing woman is always a key suspect and often her killer. Our only proof she went in the water is his, and he changed his story several times.

Authorities this morning said they are not looking at this case as a criminal matter.

They are holding the guy’s passport and he’s being monitored in a hotel room by LE. Word games.

= DR protecting its resorts

Exactly. This poor guy. Also, who cares if he played football?

Please.

Everybody knows these jocks / sports-type (football, lacrosse), are far more likely to engage in date-rape and sexual assaults.

Believe women!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its so incredibly obvious that she drowned, drunk. It's the only logical explanation. I don't understand the finger pointing at the other drunk kids. Yes, they were on spring break. Kids do dumb sh!t on spring break. I also did incredibly stupid stuff in Daytona Beach in 1996. Most people get lucky, she didn't.

It's predominantly one YOU pp who must be part of the family community in some way but absolutely refuses to accept this "logical" explanation, even as a possibility. It's beyond comprehension to her that the victim here may have made some unwise decisions (or that she drank alcohol or may have been drunk). So she continuously attempts to divert the thread with conspiracy theories, mostly naming and pointing to the guy. The other group are true crime junkies.

Investigators have named him a POI. Why are you so hysterically trying to obfuscate that fact?

Investigators clearly stated today (Thursday) that a POI is an American term, not a DR term. They said NO ONE is being looked at criminally.

US LE is also involved.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Women are weaker and she was far smaller. She didn’t force him anywhere.

He was holding onto her in a very controlling way, not just supporting or affectionate.

Was his shirt torn? How did he get the scratches? Did his missing shirt or shoes have blood on them?

His whole town is the size of a large HS. People who know him will know if he is an angry drunk, disrespects girls or is some gentle giant type.

Typical DCUM, always looking to blame the man, to the point of trying to see if he was an "angry drunk".

The beach and waves there were treacherous. It was 4am and dark. She was drunk. Perhaps she... drowned in such dangerous conditions?

Disgusting to imply this man did anything to her. Everyone in this situation used bad judgement.

The man last seen with a missing woman is always a key suspect and often her killer. Our only proof she went in the water is his, and he changed his story several times.

Authorities this morning said they are not looking at this case as a criminal matter.

They are holding the guy’s passport and he’s being monitored in a hotel room by LE. Word games.

= DR protecting its resorts

Exactly. This poor guy. Also, who cares if he played football?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how her being a swimmer or even a good swimmer matters. It's not smart for even an expert swimmer to go swim at night with red flags out, and even less so if drunk.

Someone who cannot swim would be less likely to go in water.

I would think that someone who actually IS an experienced swimmer would be less likely to go in the water. An experienced swimmer knows how reckless that would be.
The non-swimmer/less experienced swimmer wouldn't realize the dangers

-former swimmer

The guy in question was or is a lifeguard. Whether he was drunk or not, he may have known not to go in.

He definitely should have known better then.

the guy who was certified at age 15 to oversee his neighborhood pool? That guy, drunk - you'd rely on him to exercise good judgment?

I'd expect him to know better than to go into a rough current in the dark while drunk. Yes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if the Indian girl knew how to swim

Why are you having to point out her ethnicity? Is there any other girl in the story?

Because a lot of foreign born Asians don't know how to swim. Swimming is not part of Asian schooling curriculum like it is in VA public schools.
My Asian roommate in grad school could not swim, ride a bike or drive. Those are considered essential life skills here, but not in Asia. Some parents might teach their kids but more likely, the kid masters them on their own.

Swimming is not part of VA public school curriculum. That is entirely on the family to teach.

- signed a VA public school grad with two VA public school teenagers.

Swimming has NOTHING to do with this BUT you are wrong. Our NOVA schools systems have swimming in elementary school and high school.

They certainly do but. I teach in the school system. You’re a troll.

I'm not a troll. Where do you teach? My kids took swimming in APS and FCPS. I sub in APS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how her being a swimmer or even a good swimmer matters. It's not smart for even an expert swimmer to go swim at night with red flags out, and even less so if drunk.

Someone who cannot swim would be less likely to go in water.

I would think that someone who actually IS an experienced swimmer would be less likely to go in the water. An experienced swimmer knows how reckless that would be.
The non-swimmer/less experienced swimmer wouldn't realize the dangers

-former swimmer

The guy in question was or is a lifeguard. Whether he was drunk or not, he may have known not to go in.

He definitely should have known better then.

the guy who was certified at age 15 to oversee his neighborhood pool? That guy, drunk - you'd rely on him to exercise good judgment?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares about Richmond, etc? The focus is if she learned to swim in school where she grew up.

While I don't think her swimming ability is necessarily relevant, it sounds like you are asking if TJ requires all students learn to swim then? Or whatever schools she went to in elementary/middle school (Loudon County?)