Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My massage therapist voted for Trump because of low taxes, I went there the other day and the place was practically empty on a Sunday ( which has NEVER happened before). She said people are cutting back and she has no customers, I thought to myself that well this takes care of the income tax problem, no income so no tax.
I can’t believe the stupidity of small businesses and non fed people, they didn’t bother to think that if their clients lose jobs then they lose business, but here we are. I have a couple of relatives in Baltimore who voted for Trump and their business sales are in the dump. I have zero sympathy.
Btw, I am not a Fed but I have 2 brain cells to figure out that pretty much everything in DC is tied to the Federal government.
You seem to be suggesting that people in America should vote for what's best for the people in the DC metro area? Why would someone in Illinois vote so that DC area workers are employed by the government?
What a dumba$$, thinking that Feds only exist in DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Farmer who voted for Trump. Wants spending cut but not his spending. Now can’t get the grant money to legally hire an immigrant.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2025/trump-farmers-grants-freeze-usda-migrants/
This is your position?
The tax payer should be paying farmers grants to pay illegal aliens?
Taxpayers are paying farmers not to grow soybeans.
Why is that OK either?
Your only answer is to cite wrong with another wrong? WTAF?
NP- I think that this person is saying that there's a lot to unravel in where all our tax money goes. So their examples of farmer subsidies belongs here because farmers voted against their own interest, but a lot of people who did not like seeing USAID cuts, for example, (or NIH for that matter) may be pleased that there's more light being shed on these grants if there actually is waste, abuse, or in the case of farmers, probably lots of lobbyists and senators in cahoots for their home states at the expense of the taxpayers.
And we can't just post one-liners and say 'seee'? There's good reasons we want to grow food in our country and support our farmers. Blue states can't live without that. But somehow blue states are subsidizing it without a lot of say (taxation without representation), and it could be done in a better manner than everyone getting their slice while we foot the bill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Farmer who voted for Trump. Wants spending cut but not his spending. Now can’t get the grant money to legally hire an immigrant.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2025/trump-farmers-grants-freeze-usda-migrants/
This is your position?
The tax payer should be paying farmers grants to pay illegal aliens?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Farmer who voted for Trump. Wants spending cut but not his spending. Now can’t get the grant money to legally hire an immigrant.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2025/trump-farmers-grants-freeze-usda-migrants/
This is your position?
The tax payer should be paying farmers grants to pay illegal aliens?
Taxpayers are paying farmers not to grow soybeans.
Why is that OK either?
Your only answer is to cite wrong with another wrong? WTAF?
Anonymous wrote:One of the most delicious FAFOs…Arab Americans for Trump.
“We support President Trump because he promised to end war in the Middle East and Ukraine” LOL
[twitter]https://bsky.app/profile/lucagalletti.bsky.social/post/3lrvyoar3xk2p[/twitter]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Farmer who voted for Trump. Wants spending cut but not his spending. Now can’t get the grant money to legally hire an immigrant.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2025/trump-farmers-grants-freeze-usda-migrants/
This is your position?
The tax payer should be paying farmers grants to pay illegal aliens?
Taxpayers are paying farmers not to grow soybeans.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Farmer who voted for Trump. Wants spending cut but not his spending. Now can’t get the grant money to legally hire an immigrant.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2025/trump-farmers-grants-freeze-usda-migrants/
This is your position?
The tax payer should be paying farmers grants to pay illegal aliens?
Anonymous wrote:Farmer who voted for Trump. Wants spending cut but not his spending. Now can’t get the grant money to legally hire an immigrant.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2025/trump-farmers-grants-freeze-usda-migrants/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most of these farmers are republicans
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2025/jun/18/washington-cherry-growers-struggle-to-find-pickers/
The rest of MAGA won't care. They don't eat fruit.
That’s right, only liberals eat strawberries.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most of these farmers are republicans
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2025/jun/18/washington-cherry-growers-struggle-to-find-pickers/
The rest of MAGA won't care. They don't eat fruit.
Sure they do. Iceberg lettuce, pale red tomatoes and waxy cucumbers with ranch, French, or 1000 island dressing; sold room temperature.