Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IMO The CW proved that it might have happened that way but that’s not enough. I think the gang at Fairview and the PD with their shenanigans helped fuel the fire of reasonable doubt. If they had done everything by the book they might have a chance to convict.
They proved it happened to me. The car black box and cell phone data along with Johns head injury. Karens car drove backwards at 25 MPH and John's phone stopped moving stayed there getting colder until the morning. Done. She hit him he died right there. She admits she might have hit him so many times. It's just too easy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IMO The CW proved that it might have happened that way but that’s not enough. I think the gang at Fairview and the PD with their shenanigans helped fuel the fire of reasonable doubt. If they had done everything by the book they might have a chance to convict.
They proved it happened to me. The car black box and cell phone data along with Johns head injury. Karens car drove backwards at 25 MPH and John's phone stopped moving stayed there getting colder until the morning. Done. She hit him he died right there. She admits she might have hit him so many times. It's just too easy.
Anonymous wrote:IMO The CW proved that it might have happened that way but that’s not enough. I think the gang at Fairview and the PD with their shenanigans helped fuel the fire of reasonable doubt. If they had done everything by the book they might have a chance to convict.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"The defense has argued Read's vehicle did not hit O'Keefe and instead said O'Keefe was attacked by a dog and beaten by other people who were in the house before he was thrown out in the snow to die." Then the crime was pinned on karen because they talked crap on her in text message. This was the defenses defense.
Because that seems way more likely than read hitting him with the car. 😂😂😂😂
I agree! WTF total conspiracy theories are more believable in this day and age? She hit him that's how he got the head injury and died it's literally as simple as that. To convict they only have to find 5 reasonable things and they have it for at least 2 possibly 3 of the charges. I heard the instructions. Let's hope they jury has brains.
The only conspiracy theory is you not believing in science and physics. His injuries are not compatible with a car strike. Bye bye.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"The defense has argued Read's vehicle did not hit O'Keefe and instead said O'Keefe was attacked by a dog and beaten by other people who were in the house before he was thrown out in the snow to die." Then the crime was pinned on karen because they talked crap on her in text message. This was the defenses defense.
Because that seems way more likely than read hitting him with the car. 😂😂😂😂
I agree! WTF total conspiracy theories are more believable in this day and age? She hit him that's how he got the head injury and died it's literally as simple as that. To convict they only have to find 5 reasonable things and they have it for at least 2 possibly 3 of the charges. I heard the instructions. Let's hope they jury has brains.
Anonymous wrote:As a juror I would vote NG on charge 1, Guilty on charge 2, and NG on charge 3. I just don’t think she intended to kill him or thought what she did killed him. No one leaving all those crazy angry voice messages is aware they already killed the guy.
Here are the specific charges:
https://www.boston25news.com/news/local/take-closer-look-charges-karen-read-jurors-are-weighing-late-changes-verdict-slip/XKHSA74AFFFUVOVTEM45RKNVYU/
Anonymous wrote:"The defense has argued Read's vehicle did not hit O'Keefe and instead said O'Keefe was attacked by a dog and beaten by other people who were in the house before he was thrown out in the snow to die." Then the crime was pinned on karen because they talked crap on her in text message. This was the defenses defense.
Because that seems way more likely than read hitting him with the car. 😂😂😂😂
Anonymous wrote:As a juror I would vote NG on charge 1, Guilty on charge 2, and NG on charge 3. I just don’t think she intended to kill him or thought what she did killed him. No one leaving all those crazy angry voice messages is aware they already killed the guy.
Here are the specific charges:
https://www.boston25news.com/news/local/take-closer-look-charges-karen-read-jurors-are-weighing-late-changes-verdict-slip/XKHSA74AFFFUVOVTEM45RKNVYU/
Anonymous wrote:"The defense has argued Read's vehicle did not hit O'Keefe and instead said O'Keefe was attacked by a dog and beaten by other people who were in the house before he was thrown out in the snow to die." Then the crime was pinned on karen because they talked crap on her in text message. This was the defenses defense.
Because that seems way more likely than read hitting him with the car. 😂😂😂😂
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any guesses when closing arguments will be?
Friday
Opening arguments maybe. I would
not expect closing before next week.
Opening arguments were in April. Do you mean jury deliberations? I would guess verdict on Monday or Tuesday
There is no such thing as an opening argument.
Openings are statements of what the evidence will show and setting forth the party's theory of the case. Closings are arguments over the evidence that was actually admitted and why it proves the party's theory of the case. Basic trial procedure 101.
This is so smug. Plus, any good trial lawyer knows you’re always arguing to the jury.
Signed, someone who has given more openings than you
Anonymous wrote:"The defense has argued Read's vehicle did not hit O'Keefe and instead said O'Keefe was attacked by a dog and beaten by other people who were in the house before he was thrown out in the snow to die." Then the crime was pinned on karen because they talked crap on her in text message. This was the defenses defense.
Because that seems way more likely than read hitting him with the car. 😂😂😂😂
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any guesses when closing arguments will be?
Friday
Opening arguments maybe. I would
not expect closing before next week.
Opening arguments were in April. Do you mean jury deliberations? I would guess verdict on Monday or Tuesday
There is no such thing as an opening argument.
Openings are statements of what the evidence will show and setting forth the party's theory of the case. Closings are arguments over the evidence that was actually admitted and why it proves the party's theory of the case. Basic trial procedure 101.