I'd remind folks that team is still a young one, having only formed a couple years ago.
The younger teams are as new, or even newer, and don't have the same problem.
This may seem harsh but if the existing team is not doing well. Maybe its not the club. Maybe its not the coach. Maybe the kids (not specifically YOUR kid) need to train a little bit harder.
If the team has the same problem over the course of several years, then the club and the coach have to take responsibility for not cutting the kids who are not training hard enough, and for not recruiting new kids who are motivated to train. "We have bad material to work with" -- OK, but
you chose that material. Throwing up your hands and saying nothing can be done is just a cop-out.
I've seen toxic parents destroy a team over the years.
There is no toxicity among this team's parents. Everyone is supportive. Nobody is trying to coach from the sidelines. Everyone wants the team to do well.
25s had a bit of a time at Young Gunz but they lost to Crabs 9-6, had a 6-6 tie and won one 8-4. It sounds like a few pieces and they'd be fully competitive.
Their competitiveness is actually
less than the close scores would indicate. In this tournament, as during HoCo, their FOGO won the majority of the faceoffs. This gave the team possession, but the offense couldn't translate this into points nearly as often as they should have. And of course it denied the other team possession, so not as many points were scored against them as would be true with a more "average" FOGO. Without the FOGO carrying the team, their defeats would have been a lot more lopsided and the team wouldn't be competitive at all.
Can a team be coached to attack effectively? Yes. Why this team has not been coached to do so is a mystery.